Posted on 07/21/2023 6:47:55 AM PDT by Jonty30
Every species would have a limit in its ability to develop their societies. Humans are not exempt from this, even if we are the most capable species.
Part of my question is in regards to the motivation of the left and their desire to devolve society. One of the main desires of the left is to be an elitest. However, for that to happen, they have to stay ahead of the game. How does the left stay ahead if we have mostly maxxed out the sciences and math and engineering and education?
What should happen, as we do approach our limit is that the top should democratize over time as those who are behind start to catch up with those who are ahead. So, is the left purposefully devolving society so they entrench themselves as elites and contine to use the most advanced society while the rest of us live less advanced lives?
Malthusianism is the theory that population growth is potentially exponential, according to the Malthusian growth model, while the growth of the food supply or other resources is linear, which eventually reduces living standards to the point of triggering a population decline. This event, called a Malthusian catastrophe (also known as a Malthusian trap, population trap, Malthusian check, Malthusian crisis, Malthusian spectre, or Malthusian crunch) occurs when population growth outpaces agricultural production, causing famine or war, resulting in poverty and depopulation. Such a catastrophe inevitably has the effect of forcing the population to "correct" back to a lower, more easily sustainable level (quite rapidly, due to the potential severity and unpredictable results of the mitigating factors involved, as compared to the relatively slow time scales and well-understood processes governing unchecked growth or growth affected by preventive checks). Malthusianism has been linked to a variety of political and social movements, but almost always refers to advocates of population control.
For one thing, replacement births are going way, way down. As country after country goes from abject poverty to less poverty, women are having fewer babies. Modern medicine means fewer children die before 5 YO, which also leads to fewer babies born.
The world population should peak at about 11 million by 2100...
As far as resources go, look at the little European country known as the Netherlands. Given their extremely small size geographically, they are ranked the number three food exporter in the world, ranking only behind the USA, #1, and Brazil, #2. They Dutch are building and using multi-story buildings as greenhouses, with LEDs providing light to what would otherwise be dark floors shaded by ceilings and walls.
Pretty remarkable!
Thank you for the link.
Smart!
The most serious threat to the life and liberty of any society or nation of free people is a liberal female.
No, just humans...
...and cats.
True.
Hitlery Clinton, for instance, would make Mao or Hitler or Stalin look like Boy Scouts if she gained the power she desires.
Sterilization would be a great help besides many don’t want kids but like making them.
Help them out a win win deal.
I don’t think it’s a good assumption that if the species hit its limit that top would begin to democratize. For one that democratizing would be a continued evolution, thus showing society hasn’t hit its limit. And really what’s a limit? The world is constantly changing, people are constantly changing, society is constantly changing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.