Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/04/2023 8:09:59 AM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fluorescence

Mostly peaceful.


2 posted on 05/04/2023 8:11:05 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

When any election system can’t be explained so the average person knows who wins and loses then it’s crooked and designed to thwart the will of the voters


3 posted on 05/04/2023 8:12:02 AM PDT by srmanuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Rank choice voting? Grow up, this isn’t grade school or a game.


4 posted on 05/04/2023 8:13:08 AM PDT by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Again, why are paper ballots cast and counted on the same day unacceptable?


5 posted on 05/04/2023 8:14:25 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

This is a one vote country...This cr** is plain wrong.


6 posted on 05/04/2023 8:18:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

So if I’m reading the data correctly and understand the process, if just 5,234 (or more) of the 11,262 Begich only voters had voted Palin as their second choice, then Palin would have won. Those 5,234 votes would have transferred to Palin and allowed her to overcome the final margin.

I suspect most of those voters didn’t understand the process, and thus only voted for Begich.


8 posted on 05/04/2023 8:26:58 AM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

The math isn’t the problem, is it.


11 posted on 05/04/2023 8:34:15 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Ranked choice voting is inherently an incumbent protection mechanism in a two party system. It should never be used in the USA.

If you have a parliamentary system (e.g., most of Europe, back home in Israel) there can be a place, although that is debatable, as well.


13 posted on 05/04/2023 8:35:49 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Total crap ... RCV can easily be scammed and their Alaska example proves it. IE: if the D’s run a second R candidate the vote will be split.

Think of how we got stuck with Bill ‘Peyronie’ Clinton ... Perot split the R vote. There were several rumors around that suggested that the DNC footed Perot’s campaign bills. True or not a similar tactic can be used to affect a RCV election.

As has already been said, if one needs a 9,000+ word article to explain to everyday folks how their vote probably didn’t go to who they wanted to vote for, that system is corrupt from the get-go.


15 posted on 05/04/2023 8:40:37 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

If there are people who want to really openly discuss voting in our representative republic, then they need to consider all alternatives. I propose there is historical precedent and constitutional intent from our founders that an educated public is needed to vote. Literacy tests should be required as a precondition to any method of voting. Yeah, I know some of you will think I’m a flaming liberal for not requiring real property ownership as a precondition, but that’s the way I roll in the 21st century. 😂


16 posted on 05/04/2023 8:42:52 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

People get this confused with another election situation and think that if they only vote for one candidate they are casting a “bullet vote” that will help their candidate win. I was confused too at first.

RCV requires that people inform themselves about a lot of minor parties that really don’t matter. This at a time when many people don’t know much about politics at all.


17 posted on 05/04/2023 8:46:52 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

RCV is the democrat dream come true


20 posted on 05/04/2023 9:26:35 AM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Bkmk


23 posted on 05/04/2023 10:11:33 AM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson