Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

An interesting study - shows comprehensively that as women get more educated, they have less children.
1 posted on 04/21/2023 3:56:59 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Somewhere in the world, Paul Ehrlich is smiling.

As are scores of anti-family environmentalists.

And not a shot was fired.


2 posted on 04/21/2023 4:25:51 AM PDT by DoodleBob ( Gravity’s waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
It is no longer a clear explanation:

Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations

In decreasing order of strength, fertility (TFR) correlates negatively with education, CPR, and GDP per capita, and positively with religiosity. Europe deviates from other regions in several ways, e.g. TFR increases with education and decreases with religiosity in W Europe. TFR decreases with increasing strength of family planning programs in three regions, but only weakly so in a fourth, Sub-Saharan Africa (the two European regions lacked such programs). Most factors correlated with TFR are also correlated with each other. In particular, education correlates positively with GDP per capita but negatively with religiosity, which is also negatively related to contraception and GDP per capita.

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7

People and economies will prosper if policymakers help women combine career and family

Economists have proposed two main explanations.

The first is known as the quantity-quality trade-off. It suggests that as parents get richer, they invest more in the “quality” (for example, education) of their children. This investment is costly, so parents choose to have fewer children as incomes rise. Historically fertility and GDP per capita are strongly negatively related, both across countries and over time.

The second explanation acknowledges how time-consuming it is to raise children. As wages increase, devoting time to childcare—time that could otherwise be spent working—becomes more costly for parents, and especially for mothers. The result is a decline in fertility and greater female labor force participation. There is in fact historically a strong negative association between female labor force participation and fertility over time and across countries.

New fertility facts
The data show that these relationships are no longer universally true.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822433/

Then we have China...

3 posted on 04/21/2023 4:34:36 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

At least, in part, you shorten the fertility of a woman when you have her go to school. She can no longer get pregnant at 14, if she is getting a high school education.

Pushing people to wait until they are 30 years of age in the Western world is a big contributor why our birth rate is below replacement level. You are shortening a women’s fertility level to about 5 years before she declines sharply.


5 posted on 04/21/2023 4:46:24 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Black widow spiders aren't the only species that eats their mate after finishing with them. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

6 posted on 04/21/2023 6:07:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson