Note the false misleading headline.
Termination? Godless leftists love a good euphemism. It’s murder.
MTG is absolutely correct calling democrats pesos. Who is hurt mostly this? The 25 year old man who impregnates a 15 year old girl.
Heaven forbid a child have their parents’ permission before crossing state lines for an unrequired medical procedure. Especially a procedure that will likely require continued medical support and behavioral/pastoral counseling.
Maybe this will slow down the Californication of the state.
Mass killers are in to euphemisms, like the Final Solution.
Why would anyone think it OK to do otherwise?
“The word “draconian” originally comes from the name of Draco, a lawgiver from Ancient Greece, who lived in the 7th century BC. He codified many of the laws which were only transmitted orally before his time.
However, it has since been argued that the association of his name with terrible penalties is somewhat unjust. Many of the laws were only written down, not made by him. Also, he is noted to have introduced the distinction between deliberate and accidental wrongdoing, such as between murder and involuntary homicide. He even abolished some bloodier punishments known from earlier times.”
that makes it a crime, punishable with up to five years in prison, for an adult to help a minor get an abortion without parental consent.
//
Standing applause !!!
Hear that gavin Newsome and minions ?!?!!!
.
Be like Idaho, choose life.
All this law does is change the roles. One of the major reasons for getting abortion away from the feds is to stop the “control” of the will of the people on a topic. I don’t care which way the state goes as it is their decision, but by threatening punishment to control the act again is just the same as controlling it the way the feds did. It is still illegal to take the action of getting an abortion by proxy taking the decision away from the patient and putting it in the hands of government again. What was improved?
Government needing to stay out of it was the battle at the fed level for years to award people the chance to do it. Now the state is not staying out of it by directly threatening the people that determine they want to have it done. Different role, threat still exists.
wy69
Perfectly reasonable.
Well Idaho goes blue in 2024.
Geez, the first paragraph of the story destroyed the headline.
State’s Rights are State’s Rights.
Well done, Idaho!
Big points for Idaho!!!
“You didn’t read the article or or also being deliberately disihonest.”
When Roe was put aside, what it did was get the questionability of abortion out of the hands of the federal government. It made their opinions and control of the interpretation and manner of the action mute. Basically, it put it back in the hands of the people at the local level.
But creating a bill that limits the decision making process of a medical determination is no different than what the feds were interpreting in Roe. In Idaho, it is legal for a minor to make determinations concerning their medical care of which abortion falls within, under TITLE 39, HEALTH AND SAFETY, CHAPTER 45, THE MEDICAL CONSENT AND NATURAL DEATH ACT. Starting the description within that law are the words “Any person” and never refers to age.
The law even gives the attorney general the ability to prosecute someone for alleged violations of the law, even if the county prosecutor — who would normally be responsible for filing a criminal case — declines to prosecute.
So what they are doing is taking the decisionary process out of the hands of the people, again, and pushing it right back into the government and the courts. The new bill does not apply to adults in its efforts to restrict the decisions of the patient they already say can make the decision with literal kidnapping thus violating the rights of a person as they previously defined them by title 39.
So, if Roe refused the right to stop a decided abortion of the person they had previously declared within their rights, isn’t the state doing the same thing? So the government takes control of a medical determination again at the state level while taking it away from the feds. It’s still government. And the addition of threatening medical personnel with even recommending a physician to perform the procedure with up to five years in prison is jumping into medical care they previously did not have the right to observe.
Wy69