Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SheepWhisperer

SLIDE:

I have heard the name, but I do not know who Harris is. Don’t keep up much with celebrities.

No point in discussing celebrities’ looks. Most of those women have access to all sorts of beauty enhancements - plastic surgery, wrinkle smoothers, the very best make-up artists, etc. I suspect that if you saw them close up in person they would look very different.


609 posted on 03/09/2023 6:29:59 AM PST by Bigg Red (Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies ]


To: Bigg Red

“No point in discussing celebrities’ looks.”

Ummm...I replied to you...because... you mentioned a celebrity’s looks, then you actually told me to not comment on a celebrity’s looks. Don’t you find this odd and contradictory?

In this hypocrisy, you’re NOT the boss of me, or my ability to reply is like-minded topical application.
~~~~
Your comment which I replied to;
“She looks rough and a lot older than 70.”

My reply;
Compare her to Emmylou Harris, who is currently 75 and still stunningly beautiful.
“Everyone ends up with the face they deserve”
~~~~
So let me get this straight...YOUR comment about a person’s loss is acceptable, but mine is a slide. THAT sounds like “shut up” to any causal observed.

Maybe, with your “SLIDE”-snark, you’re suggesting that I should be banished to the festival basement for the EXACT SAME type of comment that you made?.

Banishment to festival IS censorship. It is shadow banning. But I suppose it’s somehow “ok” when conservatives do it to one another in order to “control” the pseudo-Q thread narrative?

Hypocrisy right there, to which too many are blind.

This is no longer a Q thread, it’s become a reductio ad absurdum of petty tyrant egos, cat pics, “in”comments, memes (most of which are great BTW) and sub news thread posts to attract readers to other websites. The thread is fading in relevance for which it was created, because the Q narrative is not coming to fruition and most “q proofs” of late are reduced to; “oh look, some of numbers match”, in some mere coincidental manner. Once upon a time it looked like it had merit, but it’s now become silliness, like a 1970’s Monte Python skit. The devolution is complete when the main topic is “slides”, as in “don’t anyone DARE change the subject away from the failing q narrative. Signs of the end of the Q narrative, when anyone who deviates from it is shunned.

Banish away tyrants!


727 posted on 03/09/2023 5:57:12 PM PST by SheepWhisperer ("For the LORD gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson