“No point in discussing celebrities’ looks.”
Ummm...I replied to you...because... you mentioned a celebrity’s looks, then you actually told me to not comment on a celebrity’s looks. Don’t you find this odd and contradictory?
In this hypocrisy, you’re NOT the boss of me, or my ability to reply is like-minded topical application.
~~~~
Your comment which I replied to;
“She looks rough and a lot older than 70.”
My reply;
Compare her to Emmylou Harris, who is currently 75 and still stunningly beautiful.
“Everyone ends up with the face they deserve”
~~~~
So let me get this straight...YOUR comment about a person’s loss is acceptable, but mine is a slide. THAT sounds like “shut up” to any causal observed.
Maybe, with your “SLIDE”-snark, you’re suggesting that I should be banished to the festival basement for the EXACT SAME type of comment that you made?.
Banishment to festival IS censorship. It is shadow banning. But I suppose it’s somehow “ok” when conservatives do it to one another in order to “control” the pseudo-Q thread narrative?
Hypocrisy right there, to which too many are blind.
This is no longer a Q thread, it’s become a reductio ad absurdum of petty tyrant egos, cat pics, “in”comments, memes (most of which are great BTW) and sub news thread posts to attract readers to other websites. The thread is fading in relevance for which it was created, because the Q narrative is not coming to fruition and most “q proofs” of late are reduced to; “oh look, some of numbers match”, in some mere coincidental manner. Once upon a time it looked like it had merit, but it’s now become silliness, like a 1970’s Monte Python skit. The devolution is complete when the main topic is “slides”, as in “don’t anyone DARE change the subject away from the failing q narrative. Signs of the end of the Q narrative, when anyone who deviates from it is shunned.
Banish away tyrants!
SLIDE
Dude!
You misunderstood my comment. I was most definitely not criticizing you for commenting on a celebrity’s looks.
Perhaps I did not put my words together properly. I merely meant that when we are looking at a female celebrity we are not seeing a woman with a naturally aged face, as such women utilize all sorts of artificial help.
Did not intend to insult you, and I apologize if I ap0eared to be criticizing you.
“and sub news thread posts to attract readers to other websites”
As one who posts news links here I just want to say that as far as I can tell all of us who do are just trying to provide news that may fit into the Q narrative so they can be discussed in that light.
Dude! You got BR to use the word ‘Dude’ as an appellation. Gotta be a first.