To: MountainWalker
it sounds like a well-reasoned response.
I think I would enjoy talking with this thing.
2 posted on
02/06/2023 4:13:44 AM PST by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
To: MountainWalker
It forgets to mention the Sun as a climate factor. You know, the thing in the sky that brought us several ice ages and record warmth throughout history. LOL
3 posted on
02/06/2023 4:20:31 AM PST by
BushCountry
(A properly cast vote (1 day voting) can save you $3.00 a gallon.)
To: MountainWalker
What is the false part? Sounds like a good reply, the scientist make up a lot of models and not that accurate due to too many variables.
4 posted on
02/06/2023 4:25:12 AM PST by
Jolla
To: MountainWalker
To: MountainWalker
Sounds like a BS artist (AKA a politician).
They gave themselves an out by saying it’s all based on models, which can be changed to manipulate the data to reach whatever conclusion they want/need.
And that is EXACTLY what they have been doing for over 50 years (which is about 42-38 more years than we were supposed to survive!)!
8 posted on
02/06/2023 4:34:13 AM PST by
ExTxMarine
(Diversity is necessary; diverse points of views will not be tolerated.)
To: MountainWalker
So AI came to the same conclusion any reasonable person with common sense has and puts serious doubts on climate cultist and scientist methods and reasoning.
10 posted on
02/06/2023 4:43:56 AM PST by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: MountainWalker
So are we going to try to treat ChatGPT as the new ‘Oracle at Delphi’?
13 posted on
02/06/2023 5:05:49 AM PST by
Aevery_Freeman
(DemonRatz to Biden: You've outlived your uselessness. Buh-Bye!)
To: MountainWalker
Without human activity and its effects on the Earth's climate system, it would be difficult for climate scientists to make accurate predictions about the future climate. Let me make an absolutely certain prediction. You can take this one to the bank:
"Without human activity its effects on the Earth's climate system" climate scientists would starve. Very quickly. They wouldn't be bothered with making ludicrous predictions about weather.
To: MountainWalker
Color me shocked at the perceived lack of bias.
15 posted on
02/06/2023 6:16:14 AM PST by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: MountainWalker
17 posted on
02/06/2023 6:29:18 AM PST by
sauropod
(“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
To: MountainWalker
Is it possible for AI to determine what is truth and what is a lie?
19 posted on
02/06/2023 9:30:48 AM PST by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: MountainWalker
ChatGPT seems like an amiable Rainman.
In this instance, since humans have nothing to do with causing climatic changes, ChatGPT is reduced to “garbage out”.
21 posted on
02/06/2023 4:34:05 PM PST by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: MountainWalker
Without human activity and its effects on the Earth's climate system, it would be difficult for climate scientists to make accurate predictions about the future climate. The presence of 7.8 billion people on the planet adds complexity and variability to the climate system, making predictions even more challenging. Translation: They don't know $hi+.
23 posted on
02/07/2023 7:59:42 AM PST by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
