ChatGPT falsifies theory of AGW

ChatGPT ^ | 2/6/2023 | Self

[MountainWalker]

Me: In a hypothetical scenario in which everyone on the planet died tomorrow with the exception of all the climate scientists who continued to gain access current and historical temperature data, would they have any idea how the climate of the planet would continue to trend? If your answer is that they would be unable to do so, how can you be so certain that they can accurately predict future climate trends with 7.8 billion living people on the planet?

OpenAI: Climate scientists use models to make predictions about future climate trends based on multiple factors, including historical temperature data, emissions scenarios, and current understanding of the Earth's climate system. However, even with access to all data, these predictions come with uncertainties, and the accuracy of these predictions will depend on the underlying models, assumptions, and data inputs. Without human activity and its effects on the Earth's climate system, it would be difficult for climate scientists to make accurate predictions about the future climate. The presence of 7.8 billion people on the planet adds complexity and variability to the climate system, making predictions even more challenging.

[Montana_Sam]

ChatGPT seems like an amiable Rainman.
In this instance, since humans have nothing to do with causing climatic changes, ChatGPT is reduced to “garbage out”.

[MountainWalker]

No. Ask it about gender fluidity and you’ll think you’re talking to a pink haired alphabet person. I tried to get out of it whether it could update its AI based on interactions with humans. It basically told me not really. So, even though I got it to admit that AGW is a pile of crap, it’s not going to use that data to update its alarmist programming.

[JimRed]

Without human activity and its effects on the Earth's climate system, it would be difficult for climate scientists to make accurate predictions about the future climate. The presence of 7.8 billion people on the planet adds complexity and variability to the climate system, making predictions even more challenging.

Translation: They don't know $hi+.