Posted on 01/07/2023 4:37:17 PM PST by george76
Dr Peter McCullough explains that latest analysis shows Myocarditis now running at 25,000 per million and we're still relatively early days.
Pre Covid it was 4 in a million.
When will Congress and the American people listen to global experts at the top of their field.
TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND CASES PER MILLION - in unvaxxed times it was just FOUR PER MILLION
YES
The one with grapheme that causes you to become a human magnet according the Tenpenny isn’t approved. But it is of great use on the beach looking for coins.
Never had the shots nor did my wife. We got covid, had already been taking Vit D and zinc and when she tested positive twice with the same tests the nursing home she works at had been negative for over a year. Obviously not a crappy test. We both started feeling sick within a day and I ran out and got ivermectin and doxycycline to add to the Vit D and zinc.
There was never a day we couldn't get out of bed. It was a bad cold/flu combo type of thing and we were over it in a week. So have you gotten all the recommended boosters?
He found the facts with a endoscope up the decorum of John Kennedy Jr as reported on substack page of Steve Kirsch. You know. The holy trinity of credibility.
Respectfully, half the “medical advice” in America is coming from journalism majors and big tech employees.
Yeah, I think a board certified cardiologist who is widely published and has even been an editor for scientific/medical journals is more credible.
In the end my thoughts on “Covid” are no more valuable than yours and both of us can have differing opinions - a seemingly dead perspective here on FR, but one I try to follow. I don’t blindly follow any “expert” on anything and certainly would not follow an anonymous poster on a chat board.
The media references the CDC, FDA, WHO, or even big pharma themselves when most of the data used by the CDC/FDA comes directly from big pharma!
McCullough has provided references for his conclusions from what I have seen and he seems to welcome debate over the source material. This is the first time I have ever been aware of him selling a product. I questioned the Front Line doctors for a possible financial motive around here long ago. I did not dismiss what they said, but simply pointed out that they had a website that was so busy you had to email them and wait for days (according to a relative) at one point. It was not free.
I never saw a motive like that with Malone but now he has a book and has veered outside of his lane, but he lost a lot of consulting income by coming out as a skeptic (not that he needs it) and he was not anti-vax at first either.
Harvey Risch and Jay Bhattacharya have no incentive that I can see for expressing skepticism and both have stated they lost friends and status in the academic community for questioning the orthodoxy. I am not aware of either of them selling anything and I find them credible. Neither of them started from an anti-vax perspective.
Ed Dowd who approaches the topic through simple data analytics (insurance actuary data) is very credible to me and he has never changed his conclusions. However, he now has a book. I have looked at his numbers and if they are real the math is indisputable about the risks/benefits of the vaccine.
Fauci is going to write a book. It is certain - big advance and payday coming along with any 6 figure position he wants with big pharma. I wonder if people will question him for a profit motive or even consider the “royalties” that his agency that he ran for decades with an iron fist is a conflict of interest? How much will he benefit for pushing the vaccines for his friends and squashing other treatment options that were not profitable?
Prior to Covid, many in the homosexual community accused him of doing the exact same thing I think he did with the Wuhan Flu. Where are they at now?
The Obama administration banned “gain of function” research but Fauci simply shrugged that off and gave money to a third party friend to continue it. Could that have influenced his actions about the “pandemic”? Was he looking out for us or himself when he censored skeptics?
It is hard to find people without some investment or angle on both sides of this debate. Big pharma made the most money of them all and they shower it on many people who are purported to be “experts” as well as our politicians and bureaucrats.
If you dismiss McCullough for selling a supplement perhaps you should openly dismiss Fauci and the CDC/FDA? I believe they took his license to practice as a cardiologist for something entirely unrelated to “cardiology”. Isn’t that curious to you?
Honest question - how can we trust any media debate on this subject when it’s brought to you by Pfizer or Moderna? I factor in a profit motive for McCullough to sell supplements, but fairness demands I apply it to the other side. Follow the money. Always.
There is other money in play here too. One can make a legitimate argument that the “pandemic” impacted the 2020 Presidential election. Without it, Trump would have a lot of control over the trillions in government spending and levers that control trillions more. Perhaps that “profit motive” also had much to do with the pandemic?
If you do not agree with gay marriage should you lose your job even though your occupation does not (or did not if retired) have anything to do with the subject beyond your personal opinion? How is that any different than stripping a cardiologist of his license to practice (quite successfully by the way) for his opinion on vaccine dangers?
>>>> McCullough is a second rate hack. <<<<
So you have better credentials than this, huh gassy. Sure you do.
https://www.uscjournal.com/authors/peter-mccullough
Dr. McCullough joined the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute in Detroit following his fellowship at the Beaumont Hospital, where he remained until 2000. He then moved to Kansas City, Missouri, to serve as Section Chief of Cardiology of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Truman Medical Centers.
After his time in Missouri, Dr. McCullough returned to Michigan to serve as a Consultant Cardiologist at the Beaumont Hospital, and also as Chief, Division of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine Division of Cardiology. In 2010, following his stint at Beaumont Hospital, he was appointed as the Chief Academic and Scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System, also in Detroit. In 2014, Dr. McCullough joined Baylor University Medical Center as Vice Chief of Internal Medicine. He was also appointed Chief of Cardiovascular Research of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, and Program Director of the Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Program.²
Dr. McCullough is recognized internationally as a leading figure in the study of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state, having over 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine.³ He is also a founder of the Cardio Renal Society of America, which is a group that dedicates itself to bringing cardiologists and nephrologists together to work on the increasing global issue of cardiorenal syndromes. He is the Co-Editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and is also currently serving as the Chair of the National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP), the largest community screening effort for chronic diseases in America.⁴
Career Timeline
1984: Graduated from Baylor University with a Bachelor in Science
1988: Graduated with a medical degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
1991: Completed his residency at University of Washington School of Medicine
1991: Dr. McCullough begins his period as a medical attending at Mercy Hospital
1993: Studies his Masters degree in Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health
1994: Begins his fellowship in cardiovascular diseases at the William Beaumont Hospital
1997: Joins the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute
2000: Appointed to serve as Section Chief of Cardiology of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Truman Medical Center
2002: Made a Consultant Cardiologist and Division Chief of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine at the William Beaumont Hospital
2010: Serves as the Chief Academic and Scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System
Current: Joined Baylor University Medical Center as Vice Chief of Internal Medicine and Chief of Cardiovascular Research of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute
Dr. McCullough received the International Vicenza Award for Critical Care Nephrology for his outstanding work and contribution in the area of cardiorenal syndromes. He has also been a recipient of the Simon Dack Award from the American College of Cardiology, and his works have appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and other prestigious journals worldwide. He has been an invited lecturer at the New York Academy of Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency, and the U.S. Congressional Oversight Panel.
Actually the religion would be branch covidian and the clot shot the sacrament of the religion. You know the physical means of grace. It’s bad enough y’all can’t get your facts right but you can’t even get basic religion right. Sometimes the stupidity is just painful to read.
All of you Branch Covidians have several things in common. All of you are arrogant and snarky.
December 19, 2022, the Cleveland Clinic posted the results of their study into the effectiveness of the COVID19 jab, “Among 51011 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster was 30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine”.
This result blows the government’s CDC and NIH party line to bits.
Funny you fail to mention him being stripped of privileges for lying about his institutional credentials. Which had zero to do with Covid. Additionally there are a lot of cardiologists out there. If he is so correct why does he not enjoy the support of the broader community of peers and physicians. Because he is wrong.
I notice you failed to actually respond to what I said. Truth must hurt.
LMAO! Me either!
Pfizer and Moderna are participating in studies to ascertain the long term effects of mRNA vaccine induced myocarditis. Reported nov.12, 2022 on nbc news. It is a real, but not well appreciated phenomena. No mention of monitoring patients for subclinical myocarditis. Parsimonious utilization of resources would make that project seem Superfluous but myo- and percarditis shouldn’t be brushed aside. It’s not a skin rash...but inflammation of the muscular apparatus that keeps us alive. You know that.
Many other pharmaceuticals have been taken off the market for less.
I rest my case.
Are you actually denying any of those credentials are incorrect? Which ones? They all seem to be independently and separately referenced. Send us your own resume while you’re at it.
References
https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-mccullough-0842a070/
https://www.cardiometabolichealth.org/peter-mccullough.html
https://www.cardiometabolichealth.org/peter-mccullough.html
https://www.cardiorenalsociety.org/what-we-do.html
https://health.usnews.com/doctors/peter-mccullough-304612
we have good freepers who insist that there is no connection, but the evidence keeps piling up.....
Get a vaccine exemption letter for you or your loved ones.
The Wellness Company offers medical consults for vaccine exemption letters signed by one of our licensed providers who support medical freedom. Letters can be completed on TWC Letterhead or you can upload your own from an employer or educational organization.
We evaluate exemptions for all types of vaccines, and for all ages. Submit your information and we will take care of the rest!
Members pay $199.99 (a savings of $50 shown during checkout!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.