possible removal of asitting President and Vice President of the United Statesalong with members of the United States Congress (SCOTUS req for certiorari)

Supreme Court Docket ^ | 10/20/22 | SCOTUS

[C210N]

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.

[Valpal1]

Who is Raland J. Brunson (petitioner).

Expect to be denied due to lack of standing.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Cert. Denied. And I don’t even need to break out a crystal ball for that one.

[RideForever]

Maybe our Supreme justices realized that Communists have no need of their services.

[Boogieman]

The case is hopeless. Some guy representing himself who writes stuff like this in his petition:

‘e) Due to the uniqueness of this case, the trial court does have proper authority to remove the Respondents from their offices under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 which states “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. ”’

He actually thinks that he can petition for a criminal conviction in a civil case.

[Boogieman]

“That ‘laugh’ is actually on the SCOTUS docket.”

Plenty of stuff gets on the docket after being rightly rejected by lower courts, and is quickly rejected by SCOTUS as well.

[PatriotarchyQ]

This is a serious threat to Thomas. An attempt to make him die of laughter.

[MinuteGal]

Will someone please post in a few sentences and in plain English what-and-who this is all about...and what is its impact on you or me or the presidency or whoever or whatever????

I used to be a professional writer for a magazine publishing house, but dang if I can decipher what the subject/object is in this "request for certiorari" thingie.

Leni

[MomwithHope]

Btt

[lastchance]

You are not alone.

[Georgia Girl 2]

There is zero chance this gets heard.

[quikstrike98]

You’re most likely correct. Sadly.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Yes sadly.

[Big Red Badger]

Sadly
Sad.

[Dr. Franklin]

It's a pro se case, meaning the petitioner has no attorney. SCOTUS refused its constitutional obligation to hear the Texas v. Pennsylvania case under its mandatory original jurisdiction. It's not likely to take a pro se case on the same matter. I would like to be wrong, but getting four justices to hear the case, meaning three more than Justice Thomas, is not likely.

[Alter Kaker]

Lol. Total crackpot.

[Gay State Conservative]

SCOTUS made it clear in January of last year that there are no rules when it comes to elections. And we can be damn sure that every other court in the country got the message.No rules!

[MHGinTN]

If we still lived in a Constitutional Republic, in reality, then something along these lines would have been heard by the SCOTUS withing months of the 2020 election fraudery.

The deep state/globalist oligarchy owns men such as Pence and Roberts and Schumer and Biden and McConnell and NAsty Smellousy (oh wait, that one is not a 'men' per se)..

[dragnet2]

Bookmark

[j.havenfarm]

We’ll, if my dog poops out a ham sandwich, we’ll all have a wonderful lunch. The two events are equally likely to occur.
Seriously, didn’t we learn our lesson in 2020 with the magic executive orders, quo warranto writs, and imminent invocations of the Insurrection Act? This is bull crap. Nothing will come of it. It is a waste of time to spend a single minute contemplating it.

And I expressed these sentiments back then, so I’ll go ahead and cue the idiot “”At least someone’s doing something” response that would always be given back then

[sauropod]

bkmk