To: Red Badger
Figures from those three….
….good call from the others though
2 posted on
10/11/2022 10:04:28 AM PDT by
Guenevere
(“If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?”)
To: Red Badger
The lawyers chose to keep the jury with these people to get the conviction overturned.
Now, it looks great to see he’s on a trip to the electric chair.
3 posted on
10/11/2022 10:04:37 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Red Badger
Heh. The guy doesn’t understand jury nullification. If you are on a jury you never need share WHY you made the decision you did. And only jury members out and out saying, in interviews, that they found against him because they are racist against his race is the only thing that could remotely cause anyone to reverse their decision.
4 posted on
10/11/2022 10:07:05 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: Red Badger
Dissent issued by two minorities and a dyke.
Women suck at running things and decision making skills.
5 posted on
10/11/2022 10:07:29 AM PDT by
EEGator
To: Red Badger
Ron White once observed that “in some states they're trying to do away with executions,in my state (Texas) they're putting in an express lane”..and then he gives one of those smiles of his.
To: Red Badger
“As a result, Thomas was convicted and sentenced to death by a jury that included three jurors who expressed bias against him,”
No they didn’t. They expressed bias against interracial marriage. So what. everyone has an opinion. And most of us have minority opinions.
7 posted on
10/11/2022 10:09:36 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: Red Badger
In a 12-page dissent, the court's three Democratic-appointed Justices Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Sonia Sotomayor contended that the "errors in this case render Thomas’ death sentence not only unreliable, but unconstitutional." The Supreme Commies Haz The Sadz.
8 posted on
10/11/2022 10:10:09 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Red Badger
Why isn’t black animus toward whites ever effectively alleged in jury selections? It’s far more prevalent.
9 posted on
10/11/2022 10:10:12 AM PDT by
fwdude
(Society has been fully polarized now, and you have to decide on which pole you want to be found.)
To: Red Badger
Just because a juror does not agree with interracial marriage does not mean that they would convict someone of murder without good evidence. Two totally different things.
14 posted on
10/11/2022 10:39:16 AM PDT by
Revel
To: Red Badger
You know what jury was racist? The O.J. jury.
17 posted on
10/11/2022 10:49:29 AM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: Red Badger
If the jurors admitted out front their opinion then it’s far less a problem than jurors who hide it.
Regardless this POS murdered his wife and child and stepchild. Eff him.
18 posted on
10/11/2022 10:50:33 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Red Badger
Before his execution, they need to make sure he is vaccinated.
To: Red Badger
But ok to have DC courts packed with Dems who openly hate Rep on juries?
22 posted on
10/11/2022 10:59:18 AM PDT by
pas
To: Red Badger
ya too bad we dont have more jurors like that in this era...
30 posted on
10/11/2022 12:42:56 PM PDT by
sit-rep
( )
To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
Even racists have civic duties, which include serving jury duty. If the verdict turns against you and you think racism was behind it, you should go for incompetent counsel because it was the job of your shyster to get the (allegedly) racist juror disqualified “for cause.” I know of no blanket legal premise that prevents racists from serving on a jury.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson