Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Red Badger
Meh. At best.
At least he’s not as ugly as he was - but still pretty poor.
2 posted on
09/08/2022 11:03:26 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
09/08/2022 11:03:52 AM PDT by
madison10
To: Red Badger
Let’s hope that Elton John and Bernie Taupin don’t redo “The King Must Die” to get another big hit.
4 posted on
09/08/2022 11:04:34 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
To: Red Badger
Didn’t he cheat on his wife?
5 posted on
09/08/2022 11:06:07 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: Red Badger
No he's not the new King. He's the new Queen.
7 posted on
09/08/2022 11:07:33 AM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: Red Badger
>>Charles could choose from any of his four names - Charles Philip Arthur George.
So, in theory, he could rule as “King Arthur”, just to defile English culture some more.
8 posted on
09/08/2022 11:07:44 AM PDT by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ~you/base)
To: Red Badger
“For instance, his grandfather George VI’s first name was Albert, but he reigned using one of his middle names. Charles could choose from any of his four names - Charles Philip Arthur George.”
If it’s Arthur, would it be the First, or the Second?
To: Red Badger
I suppose this is a nice diversion from their economic woes
10 posted on
09/08/2022 11:08:23 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: Red Badger
What will he be called? Impolite circles might say inbred fidiot. Others may say Charles the dolt.
12 posted on
09/08/2022 11:08:32 AM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
To: Red Badger
Can’t wait to see how Chuck tries to sell his eye-wateringly expensive coronation plans to an impoverished nation...
13 posted on
09/08/2022 11:09:11 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: Red Badger
May he reign no longer than the Queen’s Uncle.
17 posted on
09/08/2022 11:10:27 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: Red Badger
William going to hold the purse strings now.
Sorry Harry...bad timing for your refusal to apologize to your brother.
To: Red Badger
Chaz will never fill her shoes.
End of an era.
To: Red Badger
was really hoping Queen Elizabeth would outlive charles
oh well
camilla succeeded where wallis simpson failed
camilla’s husband certainly was a good sport
he deserves a title or two
21 posted on
09/08/2022 11:11:41 AM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: Red Badger
He should reign as Aures Magnae, Rex.
22 posted on
09/08/2022 11:11:59 AM PDT by
nd76
To: Red Badger
“Charles Philip Arthur George”
Why do I feel like this piker will chose “Arthur”?
25 posted on
09/08/2022 11:13:16 AM PDT by
reed13k
(For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
To: Red Badger
didnt the brits behead a King Charles?
26 posted on
09/08/2022 11:13:45 AM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: Red Badger
Wait, wha . . .? Doesn’t he at least have to pull the sword out of the stone first?
29 posted on
09/08/2022 11:14:30 AM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Red Badger
32 posted on
09/08/2022 11:15:28 AM PDT by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
To: Red Badger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
