Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[Allegra]

Stop spreading lies, Fake News.

[Allegra]

When I have a few minutes, I’ll hunt down a source or two. I’ve read it a couple of times in the past.

No offense, but I don’t trust or believe anything coming out of the CDC.

And the idiot who is bloviating about “discrimination” on here is making about as much sense as Kamala Harris does on any given day. He doesn’t realize that some of us are too strong to be concerned about being “discriminated” against by the likes of him. 😄

[SecAmndmt]

BTW you should back up the “a lot of things” that you say about Dr McCullough. His credentials, publications, experience, skill set make up his stock in trade. Be careful, gassy. Please list the “lies” with references. Try not to spout Biden talking points.

[CatHerd]

No offense taken. I don’t trust *everything* that comes out of the CDC, either. (Which is not to say I don’t trust *anything* — much of what is on their website is pretty reliable.)

As the CDC is the agency charged with tracking vaccinations, to my knowledge we are unfortunately stuck with it as the sole available source for numbers of people vaccinated. Perhaps you or others know of other sources. I would be grateful to learn of them.

[grey_whiskers]

Dirty Dozen.

Huh. Sounds like it came from the "Center for Countering Digital Hate".

The Chairman of the Board there according to their own web page, was a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress where he led their work on combating violent white supremacy that informed the White House’s Domestic Terrorism strategy. One should also note that one of the people pushing against vaccine disinformation is Dr. Peter Hotez, who in an editorial in Nature, mentioned the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

He wrote (excerpts)

The United States hosts the world’s largest and best-organized anti-vaccine groups. According to the London-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, these are influential groups, not a spontaneous grass-roots movement. Many far-right extremist groups that spread false information about last year’s US presidential election are doing the same about vaccines.

and

Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber security, law enforcement, public education and international relations. A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures. The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril.

I think it was the Center for Countering Digital Hate who originated or popularized the deBOOOOOOOOONKing talking points the that dirty dozen made up to $36 million from their efforts. Now do Moderna, who IIRC was like a billion in debt in their June 2022 SEC filing, and whose executives were crowing about, what was it, a $1.8 billion or something 1st quarter in 2021. It was a video presentation and I can't remember if I bookmarked it, and I'm too busy at the moment to try to look it up.

Or there's always Pfizer, who has petitioned a judge to throw out with prejudice, a False Claims Act lawsuit against them. The people suing Pfizer, have filed a statement with the judge in response, which reads in part:

Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud.

Finally, there is no such thing as Q theory. Q did not mention ANY of the people you list (text search on a Q post archive).

...and Mercola is highly respected and has been around a long time. He was forced by the Derps to remove all content after an initial posting period of 48 hours, because he had also been selling nutritional supplements or somesuch on his website.

Your bad faith (or at best intellectual laziness) is shown by you and some of the other pro-jab posters, constantly linking rejection of the clot shots, to mindlessly following conspiracy theories: in keeping with the strategy suggested by Hotez and the Center for Countering Digital Hate (their other bug-a-bears according to their own website, are antisemitism, climate change, and climate change misinformation).

Deep State Derpishness all the way.

[grey_whiskers]

Another calls me “ catheter herder”

That was a well-crafted pun!

[David Chase]

I’m not attempting to divide people here.

I’m also not King of the World…..well, not yet.

I can’t control what out of control Governments are doing and have done over the last two plus years.

My comment was exclusively directed at making list of Freepers here that disagree with Ransomnote and her fans.

My comment had nothing really to do with vaccines as it could be topic that people can start making list of other people they don’t like and want to target.

The actions here and only here should not be comparable to the actions by Leftist Governments.
Yet here we are.
Making list of enemies who are other Freepers.

[grey_whiskers]

Making list of enemies who are other Freepers.

You mean like entropy12 saying verbatim (post 359) "It is best to ignore Allegra" and posts to Allegra "Look in the mirror, you'll see the real fake." while within a post or two of that, Fury writes to entropy to "Knock it off".

Whew! Almost blew the trolls' cover there.

But that's ok.

Here's where the trolls' cover gets blown like Bill Clinton with Monica:

Rockefeller Foundation Wants Behavioral Scientists To Come Up With More Convincing COVID Vaxx Narratives

The Mercury Project lists these bullet points as their focus:

“Funded projects will provide evidence about what works–and doesn’t–in specific places and for specific groups to increase Covid-19 vaccination take-up, including what is feasible on the ground and has the potential to be cost-effective at scale. Each of the 12 teams will have access to findings from the other teams while exploring interventions including, but not limited to:

Conducting literacy training for secondary school students in partnership with local authorities to help students identify Covid-19 vaccine misinformation.

Equipping trusted messengers with communication strategies to increase Covid-19 vaccination demand.

Using social networks to share tailored, community-developed messaging to increase Covid-19 vaccination demand.”

In other words, their focus is propaganda, propaganda and propaganda. The very basis of the existence of the Mercury Project presupposes that individuals cannot be trusted to make up their own minds about the information they are exposed to, and that they must be molded to accept the mainstream narrative. It also presupposes that mainstream or establishment information is always trustworthy and unbiased.

[CatHerd]

It’s not a pun:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pun

It’s more creative than the usual one that translates to “something you find in the catbox”, though. I’ll give it that.

It’s rather insulting to dedicated family members who lovingly care for ill or elderly loved ones, though, and those suffering from medical conditions that require catheterization. I don’t mind it for my own sake — what’s another childish insult to me? I just consider the source. I do find it distasteful on their account, however.

[grey_whiskers]

It’s more creative than the usual one that translates to “something you find in the catbox”, though. I’ll give it that.

Given that the social media poster CatTurd seems to be at least ideologially neutral towards Q, I wasn't going to give you false credit by making that connection.

As far as the pun, as you have been giving off airs of virtue-by-association with the medical community, and catheters are a medical device, it was a very nice pun.

Get rekt, troll.

[week 71]

Hello

Some questions (tone is curious and not combative). Do you agree that the effectiveness of the vaccines at preventing or transmitting the virus are without a doubt a fail?

The comments out in the internet ‘ether’ are presumptuous in stating viruses evolve to become less virulent in humans - You must know of anthropologists or missionaries that visit an untouched tribe that ends with sever disease to the natives that was simply a ‘cold’ to the travelers. (the host population changes not the virus)

Would you now suggest the vaccines are safe knowing what we know now? Genuine question - anecdotal and peer reviewed articles suggest otherwise in my observations.

To quote Four Non Blondes - ‘What’s going on?’. Cheers

[grey_whiskers]

I just consider the source. I do find it distasteful on their account, however.

Spoken like a true liberal. Raise your eyebrows a bit higher and maybe you can achieve unpowered flight.

[CatHerd]

That’s bilarious! How many times have I posted that the question of whether or not to get vaccinated is now moot? Because the vaccines are no longer effective against the new Omicron variants, and besides, the newest variants are mild. There’s no real benefit to getting vaccinated now. Why bother, even if you think they are 100% safe? (No vaccine is 100% safe, of course.)

Yet you imagine there are all these “paid trolls”? Why would they bother now, and with FR, anyway? My goodness!

[Varsity Flight]

Some drs viewpoints: https://doctors4covidethics.org/elementary-my-dear-watson-why-mrna-vaccines-are-a-very-bad-idea/

[grey_whiskers]

How many times have I posted that the question of whether or not to get vaccinated is now moot? Because the vaccines are no longer effective against the new Omicron variants, and besides, the newest variants are mild.

Well, why is the Rockefeller foundation throwing a lot of money at it then, and why does The Hill have an article on a fall COVID surge and an effort to fight it with new boosters?

The Hill is not Q theory, even you trolls need to admit.

It's fun watching you trolls talk out of both sides of your mouth.

If the jabs are so unnecessary why do you pull out all the rhetorical stops and draw yourself up to your full puny intellectual height, getting all bent out of shape over "vax disinformation"?

And why do you (plural) follow the Derp State strategy of trying to tie those warning about side effects, to "right wing extremists" (like the non-existent "Q theory")?

Sorry Wormtongue. Turn elsewhither. I do not need to lick your fingers. But I fear your voice has lost its charm.

[Jane Long]

Please ping me if you get the list of lies/related references.

Dr McCullough is a highly credentialed (as you’ve mentioned) cardiologist who has also been threatened and maligned by the rabid media/left/BigPharma operatives.

[Fury]

Re: 367 - LOL! We all make lists of some sort for various reasons.

In the end, I expect lists will have… little to no effect on who posts what and where.

[Jane Long]

Thank you for posting that doctors4covidethics link.

From the link....

About
We are hundreds of doctors and scientists from all corners of the globe. We have written three letters to the European Medicines Agency, urgently warning of short term and long term dangers from COVID-19 vaccines, including clotting, bleeding and platelet abnormalities. We first began warning of blood-related risks before media reports of clotting led to vaccine suspensions around the world.

In the absence of crucial safety data, we are demanding the immediate withdrawal of all experimental gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We oppose vaccine passports, which threaten public health and violate Nuremberg and other protections. We are warning that ‘health passes’ place coercive pressure on citizens to submit to dangerous medical experimentation, in return for freedoms that once were human rights.

Background of the docs, to the article you linked...

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and Thailand)

Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD, Department of Chemistry (studied Medicine and Medical Microbiology in Germany, has taught Biochemistry since 2001 in present university in Canada); focus on Pharmacology, metabolism, biological membranes, computer programming; experimental research focuses on bacterial toxins and antibiotics (Daptomycin); has written a textbook on Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Canada and Germany)

Let’s see any FRoctors/FR$$s attempt to smear these REAL and good docs, as they have so many others.

Again, thanks...great info, at that link.

[Jane Long]

BTTT.

[grey_whiskers]