Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Fractal Trader]
An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.
The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”
The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”
Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction. The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.
In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.
We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.”
We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:
Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.
The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.
Our results are so similar to those of Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.
What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”
In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.
In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Further resources:
- Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
- Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
- The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
- The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
- Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
- Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
- German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
- Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
- German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
Please, I am curious as to your answers.
*************************
Okay, you got it.
“1. There is no proof of correctness of those who were and continue to be wrong on numerous issues surrounding vaccination.”
***************
Well, we now know that they don’t prevent or stop the transmission of Covid. The jury is still out on the amount of harm the vaccine is causing. Although, it is becoming pretty clear that they are doing harm. That is why I continue to read these threads. Yes, some may be a little over the top, but their is no denying the government has done done some pretty horrible unethical things throughout the years in the name of science. So, I choose to read many sources besides the government sponsored studies.
***************************
“2. As knowledge as evolved so has my thinking. That is what scientists are supposed to do. However, your side is that of the arrogant or prideful. The judgment those who ascribe to Q theory while simultaneous flouting scripture is perhaps anathema to the faith.”
****************************
I’m glad your opinion evolved. Although, your opinion didn’t evolve until the government opinion evolved. My point is that if you had just a little humility to look into a tiny bit of information, it would have evolved much sooner.
However, you were too busy calling people uneducated and dumbasses. It seemed inconceivable to you that you could ever learn something from someone without a medical degree.
Also, I am not a Q follower. I never participated in the Q threads, so don’t accuse me of being a Q follower. Unlike you, if I didn’t agree or wasn’t interested in a thread, I didn’t participate. I didn’t show up to call them names, or try to stop their free speech or free thought.
**********************************
“3. Please do not confuse authority (understanding and education on issues) as arrogance. That is a cliche. I never called for mandatory vaccination though was accused of same. I reacted to being called a Nazi and a murdered. That is just to react to. Are you suggesting that being smeared in the most vile of ways makes me arrogant to respond? Please. Tell me your opinion of most of the Q posters calling me and my colleagues who post here as follows:
1. Murderers
2. Nazis
3. Fraudsters
4. Accomplices to crimes against humanity
People have called for our summary executions, assaults and imprisonment. And yes, one has identified me and made it known in my church through his or her friends. So you condemn this? If so where and when? If not yet, how about now?
Do you accept that this overbearing treatment and relentless positing of perhaps fringe articles are harming the financial contribution to this forum?”
******************************
This is what I am talking about, you have no authority. The fact that you think you do, does make you arrogant. However, you do have medical knowledge, and your opinion does carry some weight. Although, it does not make you an expert in vaccine development.
I am not a doctor, but I was a pre med graduate. I decided to take a a different path than medical school. However, I am more than capable of reading and understanding medical information, as are a lot of people without medical degrees.
I have read countless studies and articles on vaccines in general, and believe it or not, you could probably learn a few things from me.
My family seems to either have really bad luck with vaccines, or are just genetically sensitive to them. Either way, it has made us pretty well informed on vaccines.
We had several vaccine injuries in our family. The worst was from a bad batch of the DPT shot that caused holes in the brain of my 18 month cousin. His father was also a doctor, and they took him all over the country looking for answers. It took them 15 years to find out the cause. He finally found it in some obscure medical journal in a medical library in Michigan. The batch and lot number matched. So, yes, all vaccines can cause harm to some people, and the government will cover it up.
So, you don’t like being called a Murderers, Nazis, Fraudsters, Accomplices to crimes against humanity.
Well, I don’t like being called uneducated, a conspiracy theorist, or a Q follower. All of which you have personally called me.
The worst I ever called you was pompous, and I stand by it.
You are a big boy that can handle some name calling, and so can I.
However, I absolutely condemn anyone that doxed you. This is out of bounds. We all have the right to our privacy. We all have the right to rant online without the fear of some crazy showing up at our house, work, or church. I am sorry that happen to you. No one deserves that.
Ok. Your only response to legitimate questions is conspiracy. I see you and others have coordinated your story. The data are the data. Fundraising is dropping off. I have an explanation for it based on analysis of a lot of posts. You think I am advancing conspiracy. Do you not agree that fundraising is falling off? What is the conspiracy?
It can't be, as there is no such thing as 'Q theory'. That is a made up term used to gather up the entirety of the Q discussion and wrap it up in a neat little package and then used to disparage an entire world of divergent thoughts.
Its cheap, and hardly worthy of an ex-Qtard such as yourself. Maybe you're just trying to avoid being sued by gas_dr, is that it?
It appears to me that the theory advanced has some serious flaws in its construct.
As many as the serious flaws in its construct as the one you seem to have newly adopted?
Troll.
(haha, couldn't resist)
Dance, monkey dance. The lies pile up.
Your words are there for all to see.
Me and 260 million other Americans who have taken the jabs.
Better hope 99.6% will no adverse effects (that is just more than a million Americans). Otherwise we are doomed as a country. Not just us, but all of Europe, Australia, China, Japan, India and almost all others with viable economies.
Me and 260 million other Americans who have taken the jabs.
Again, entropy....that isn’t the number who’ve taken the jabs. That’s the number of $hots distributed....and, paid for with our tax $$.
I provided the link, for you, months ago....but, you keep using that ‘jabbed’ number.
Good for the goose, good for the slander. Don't like it? Sue me.
I see you and others have coordinated your story.
Nope. This is pretty much my story. I ride alone. One riot, one ranger, I always say. However....
You and two or three other derps have started riding with this coordinated conspiracy theory that us innocent 'Qtards' and 'anti-vaxxers' are responsible for the drop in donations. Talk about coordination. You are riding that one hard, hoping that the man will come down on us evil-doers and money stealers.
And now you wanna accuse ME of coordinating a false narrative? Nukka, please. Your machinations are child-like, my government line-toeing propagandist, as devious as you might think you are. Your threats of lawsuits are laughable and you should be embarrassed.
But, through it all, I still like you, gassie. There's just something adorable about you that I just can't resist. Maybe its your infectious sense of humor.
Jane, you should be used to it by now. These noodniks can (and have been) presented with eleventy-billion pieces of overwhelming and undeniable evidence that they are full of booshito, and they act like they never saw it.
Its amazing to behold the level of refusenik in these vax deniers. Its almost not even worth trying with the simpletons. But we must endeavor to persevere. At some point, we are not even talking to them anymore, but to the viewing audience.
Then that’s why I haven’t seen it. If you go on the Q threads, you might notice that I’m not there. I respect the Q crowd’s right to their views and even agree with them on a few things, but I don’t subscribe to the overall platform. In fact, as much as I respect President Trump, I cringed at some of the posts stating that he was going to be back in office by April of 2021 or whatever, and I’m not a fan of Sydney Powell or Michael Flynn. (A couple of the Q folks don’t like me because of that, but , oh well. My opinion is my opinion.)
I have been called among other things; Mengele, murderer (complete with intentionally killing patients), and been told I commit crimes against humanity for which I should hang from a yard arm.
Well, I’ve said similar things about Anthony Fauci but never about a fellow FReeper, no matter how much one might tick me off.
The overall volume of hyperbole is one thing, the absolute commitment to destruction of those who disagree is why we have a burr on our saddle.
But I’ve seen members of the shot enthusiasts do that as well. One who has been posting on this very thread has come out several times with comments about what he has on people and how he wants them removed. On a whimsical thread about what people would do if they won that giant Mega Millions jackpot a couple of weeks ago, that guy said he’d “buy Free Republic and ban a lot of people.” He really wants a left-leaning echo chamber and gets quite wee-wee’d up about people posting opposing views.
It does work both ways.
Thank you, ransomnote.
I am so glad that I paid attention to you and other intelligent FReepers, and armed with good information, resisted the efforts of my family and my doctors to make me take the clot shot.
I am happy to be numbered among the Pure Bloods!
Oh, I know my place. One said the call me “the mom of all trolls”. Another calls me “ catheter herder” and then there are the obvious scatalogical words and cursewords I won’t repeat per forum rules. See, it does not matter that I am unvaccinated, am firmly against mandates, never so much as hinted that anyone should get vaccinated, and clearly state there are legitimate concerns about the vaccines, I’m still called $hot$hill, vax pusher, paid troll, etc. — because I don’t agree the vaccines contain nano octopuses or snake venom or parasites or whatever the kooky ingredient de jure is, or that they cause instant metastatic breast cancer, malaria, etc.
Some people only object when those with whom they are in agreement are wrongly maligned, ill treated, lied about, etc. Once, they baited someone into saying something zottable, spread it over several threads, went running to JimRob, got that person zotted, danced on his grave, but ignored a far worse post wishing death wish on me:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4034041/posts?page=188#188
That post got removed after JimRob was alerted, but no zot.
Another poster who carries on about being a Christian once called me a string of nasty names and told me not to post a prayer thread here after my €lot$hot made me sick as no one would want to pray for vaxxed me — never mind I’ve never had the vax. (eye roll) People who say such things and wish death on others must be very unhappy for whatever reason. I don’t know what to do other than pray for them — having no idea what source of their distress is, I just lift them up to Jesus. He knows, and He alone can heal them.
When it comes to the hardcore Q followers, it seems they judge who “wins” a debate by who flings the most insults and gets in the most name calling. Their arguments can be totally demolished, but by golly, they got in the most insults, false accusations and called their interlocutors the most nasty names. Of course I’m always a big loser because I refrain from calling them names in return, lol. I’m actually glad to lose a name-calling contest.
Many of the same goofy ones who push the Democrats’ Party Line on Ukraine.
Which makes me think they are paid shills.
Knock on wood!
You’re so anti-science. /s
But I love ya, Allegra. You encapsulate the true meaning of what these shmoes call 'Q theory'. I am proud to call you 'my people', whether you 'believe' in Q or not.
Yours is a constant search for the truth, and you don't let nobody stand in your way. And you stand up to those who would bully you out of your position and attempt to silence you.
That's what this is all about.
(and I've always liked the feisty ones)
Are you a medical doctor?
Oh, just quit the virtue signaling already!
It has gotten so old, so fast, with your contingent.
Don't flatter yourself, dear.
See, it does not matter that I am unvaccinated, am firmly against mandates, never so much as hinted that anyone should get vaccinated, and clearly state there are legitimate concerns about the vaccines....
What you vax deniers ALWAYS fail to acknowledge is, the very act of your vax denying suppresses dissent and truth and leaves the field open to the lying government propagandists which, in effect promotes the vax. This is why you deniers are called vax pimps and other applicable descriptors.
Engage your thought processes.
p.s. I've been called every name in the book, but you don't hear me kvetching about it. I handle my business. Or maybe I should sue somebody?
Stop trying to dox him. What, ya wanna get sued?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.