Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles
expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47


Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.


Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna
, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna
, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna
, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna
, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna
, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:




TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 1bagsterhijackagain; 1qtardtoomany; 1vaxtard2many; 2badfakeisreal; 3shotshillsbalk; clickbaitadspam; clownmagnet; covax; covaxmaladies; covaxtruth; covid; covid19; cultofransomnote; dailyfakenews; doesthiseverstop; fakenewsexpose; fakenewssource; frheldransom; froctormurderers; froctorpayoff; gasbag; gasbagdr; gasbagtroll; genocide; grapheneoxideagain; humbletard; jabpushers; killshots; mengeleshots; paidshills; qtardiousmaximus; ransomcult; ransomkingoffakenews; recycledconspiracy; vaccines; vaxdolts; vaxx; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 561-569 next last
To: CatHerd
BTW, proper netiquette and FReeper protocols state that if you mention someone in your post, you should ping them.

But I call you outside your name all over the place and never ping you, VaxHerd. Was that wrong?

#RudeBoy


161 posted on 08/26/2022 8:59:35 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd
p.s. You invited Kozak to the party. I haven't had a piece of that chunky monkey for a while. ThankQ.


162 posted on 08/26/2022 9:00:46 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd; ransomnote

Evidence, please?


Do your own homework, lazy $hot troll....then, shut your yap, find some pro-”vax” threads to litter, er, loiter on, and, STOP TROLLING $hot warning threads.

Here’s a few “evidence” posts to get you started, Pfizer $hill.....

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4061753/posts?page=25#25

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4057367/posts?page=63#63

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4057348/posts?page=17#17


163 posted on 08/26/2022 9:04:01 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
You better add Trump to that list. He doesn’t agree with the crackpots either.

Oh, here we go. The 'It's Trump's fault' bandwagon is here.

The derps love you, Pelham. And the Dodgers rule all of beisbol..


164 posted on 08/26/2022 9:05:23 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Yeah...that n00b $hill goes way back....to when CHINA VIRUS was being released.

What a coinkydink!


165 posted on 08/26/2022 9:05:45 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Pfizer pharm bots are in full swarm mode. Funny thing to witness. Like clockwork.


166 posted on 08/26/2022 9:07:04 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

My my. You touched a nerve with someone. Don’t you don’t it rather ironic that someone who repeatedly represents and flaunts faith is quick to slander and call names. All those years of studying the faith, I learned that people know the faithful by their love and gentleness. Whenever I see a proclamation of faith followed by personal attacks it makes me sad you see?


167 posted on 08/26/2022 9:09:47 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

None of those posts are by me, nor had I ever seen or responded to them. Yet you accuse me of being a hypocrite?

I didn’t “troll” this thread. My moniker came up in post #12.

You insults and nastiness are so endearing. I’m sure you must attract many to your cause that way. Have a nice evening and a pleasant tomorrow.


168 posted on 08/26/2022 9:11:32 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

And I give it no more than 10 minutes until the court jester takes a shot at you. Tick tick.


169 posted on 08/26/2022 9:13:50 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
They may eat you last, but you are also on the menu.

Wow, you did it again. You are a great mind and a professional writer. Every word was truer than the last. You should publish that screed somewhere.

I hereby grant you official 'Qtard' status, with clusters.

So let it be written.

Signed,

Bagster
Lord of Qtardia


170 posted on 08/26/2022 9:14:50 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

I NEVER mentioned YOU, OR posted to you, sicko.

YOU posted to ME asking for evidence.

I was kind enough to even give you “evidence”, backing my post.

Maybe your $hots are kicking in and you’re losing your mind.

Buzz off, and, find a pro-$hot thread to hang out with, with your Pfizer $hill buds.


171 posted on 08/26/2022 9:15:02 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd; Jim Noble
Yes, they actually spent time and energy compiling The List over on their Special Q Thread.

Energy well spent. The committee is now debating what color the 'V' patches will be that we attach to you trolls' smocks.

I'm thinking 'rabbit brown'. Work for you?

p.s. Jim Noble is not a troll. He makes reasonable arguments and doesn't mock and ridicule his brothers and sisters.


172 posted on 08/26/2022 9:30:23 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Blush

TY


173 posted on 08/26/2022 9:31:39 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Make yourself less available.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; ransomnote

You seem to have trouble following a logical progression.

I reminded Ransomnote about the Freeper protocol of pinging other Freepers mentioned in one’s post.

You then cried “hypocrite” about posts not pinging Ransomnote when mentioning her here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=151#151

The clear implication was that I had disparaged her in posts without pinging her, therefore a hypocrite. Without evidence. It is wrong to accuse people of wrongdoing or hypocrisy without evidence. So I asked for evidence.

You came back with posts by others (not me!) as “evidence”:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=163#163

To my knowledge, none of them have reminded Ransomnote about Freeper protocol. They may have also violated that time-honored Freeper rule, but they are not hypocrites.

And then you finish off with more insults and false accusations, as usual. If you don’t want free discussion certain threads, you can post them on the Special Q Thread where they will be immune to challenge and debate. Post them on the main board, and we are all free to comment.

BTW, I am not vaccinated.


174 posted on 08/26/2022 9:38:57 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
I am so glad to see I continue to live rent free in your head. Funny thing. I hardly every think of the conga line of breathless proclamations that are laughable on the face but preached as the gospel according to Q. The 421 chapter I believe is the next one to be written.

Shut it, gassie. Are you here to tell us that covid is over and we should all just move along? Go ahead. Do it.

You lost all credibility a long time ago.

175 posted on 08/26/2022 9:40:13 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd
If you think Q drops are comparable to what professional scientists produce, well, you are entitled to your opinion.

Apples and oranges, my little lemon. And this is why your brain don't work in the proper manner to understand what the Q program is all about. And that it is real.

Smart as you think you are.

#MissedTheBoat

176 posted on 08/26/2022 9:42:58 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

Again...I wasn’t responding to, or about YOU, narcissistic dolt.

Go find a pro-$hot thread to troll/loiter on.


177 posted on 08/26/2022 9:42:58 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: bagster

And you don’t think covid is over? Have you looked around recently? It’s ooovvveeeerrrrrrrrr. I must make you sad that means you don’t have much to make your increasingly bizarre commentary relevant in any way.

Go ahead with a personal attacks. Call me a name or slander me. You have amassed an awful lot of removals of posts. I can only imagine you are close to a time out. A little vacation would do you well. Perhaps we can get some assistance with It. Don’t disappoint me. You can do it. Otherwise it will demonstrate you have been reigned in and I just know your maverick arritude won’t tolerate that.


178 posted on 08/26/2022 9:46:02 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
I was wondering when the triumvirate would be complete tonight and without fail might I give you ranlongster.

Gassie, you know I ain't gonna let you quack all over a thread without some measure of control by a superior mind. I would be derelict to allow you to run amok like that.


179 posted on 08/26/2022 9:48:44 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I think reasonable people of good will can see the truth for what it is. I hope you get to feeling better and wish you good night and sweet dreams.


180 posted on 08/26/2022 9:48:55 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 561-569 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson