Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[bagster]

Says the Kooks that believe these type of Threads.

Kooks, huh? Ya got a list, government man?

[bagster]

I found a Leftist Blog…….

FOUND it, eh? Just by accident I bet.

they comment about this stuff.

Yes you do.

#MudBlood.com

They think it’s hilarious and are shocked it’s allowed to continue.

Just like you. Weird, huh. Thing is, nobody gives a good goddamn what 'leftists think'. Well, except for you.

"Allowed"? did you say 'allowed'? And we're the totalitarians? You are one mixed up mug, Chase.

#YourPeople

These Threads are making all of us look like fools.

No, just you. Sorry your lefty buddies find us so hilarious. All y'all gonna just have to git over it. We a free people.

[Chgogal]

Luckily for my family, all of my friends, doctors and me (fingers crossed) are still alive. Hope it stays that way. Like I said fingers crossed.

[jpsb]

well, so much for the editor of that piece. 400x is more like it.

[CatHerd]

Don’t feel bad about not being on The List. As you can see, it was compiled by committee:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=117#117

Yes, they actually spent time and energy compiling The List over on their Special Q Thread.

Back to the main subject of this thread. I meant to ping you to my #140 in case you might have thoughts on that, but somehow left you off.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=140#140

[reformedliberal]

Nattokinase is effective at dissolving clots.

My husband resolved a case of phlebitis with it.

That said, there _is_ something called senile purpura where blood leaking from capillaries pools and can be seen under the skin. They take a while to resolve and can be caused by even the simple of act of lifting something heavy.

But if you are not bleeding freely when the skin is breached, that is concerning.

[gas_dr]

D dimer does not test specifically for blood clots. D Dimer itself is an incredibly non-specific test. I would be shocked if anyone actually got the test for clots. And are best if is an indirect test of you are talking about lab fears. The only way to confirm any thrombus is angiography.

[bagster]

Excellent rant, Bamy!

[reformedliberal]

...Special Q Thread.
_______________________

IIRC, that thread became *Special* because the posters were banished from the regular forums due to the outraged embarrassment of the usual suspects.

Sorta like those “weird blogs” where cancelled professional scientists with long and verified CVs, published papers and honors from Before, are allowed to share their thoughts and findings with the public.

Anything that goes against the narrative is attacked, relegated to discussion ghettos and then mocked by the self-anointed purists for whom science stopped once ‘everyone who matters’ agreed.

Even You Tube now *allows* the good little citizens to say the injections don’t stop transmission. CDC walked back their own *mistakes* with a “Whoopsie! Our bad! We’ll reorganize”. Of course, by *reorganize* they mean tighten things up so there is less transparent reporting of what is happening on the ground. And they have made good on that by removing adverse events reports en masse.

[gas_dr]

Show me a scientific study and I’ll comment on it. This is an opinion piece. Read the conclusions.

[Jane Long]

Not to mention all of the posts that bash you, without pinging you.

So, the hypocrite whiners can whine away.

[gas_dr]

I am so glad to see I continue to live rent free in your head. Funny thing. I hardly every think of the conga line of breathless proclamations that are laughable on the face but preached as the gospel according to Q. The 421 chapter I believe is the next one to be written.

[CatHerd]

They themselves say it was because they were being ridiculed on the main board and wanted their own protected space. No one is allowed to go on their Special Q Thread and disagree with what they post there on pain of The Zot. I’ve heard that, in exchange, they agreed to keep posts about Q drops and other Q stuff off the main board, but don’t know if that is true.

If you think Q drops are comparable to what professional scientists produce, well, you are entitled to your opinion.

[CatHerd]

Evidence, please?

[bagster]

The same the same Blogs, same web-sites, same Grifters are posted by the same people here.

But here's the rub, rabbit. When this covid psyop started, the entire (almost) site got caught up in the government/media/CIA/Deep State fear/panic program. Just like a pack of lab rabbits.

It was all 'death chart' this, and 'millions will die', 'extinction event', and 'ermigerd somebody save us'

Then the free thinkers went to work, and with their fine assistance, the truth was revealed and the tide of public opinion turned, as it will when the web of lies is whisked away. And now you and a small minority stand with Fauci, CDC, and the rest of the derps (who I like to call 'the enemy').

We have Ransomnote and many others to thank for this voyage into clear thinking. You see, we are SHEEP NO MORE, rabbit. We ask questions. We don't trust the Deep State. We assume the cover story is a lie EVERY SINGLE TIME. Because it is.

You, however, are stuck in that matrix that is laid out for you. I mean, listen to you squeal now when confronted by an awakened and free people. Seriously, you need to check yourself really hard. You are f'd up beyond all recognition (fubar).

We are laughed at.

Oh? And do you know why?

I refer you to Alinsky's Rule #5 for Radicals:

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."

A dummy like you let's them manipulate you until you damn hear quote them. You are infected.

A dummy like me? I flip it on em and beat them at their own game. You see, we are smarter than them (you).

Why has this turned into a Cult?

Why do you derps think whipping out the 'cult' word is the end of the conversation? Cause you're simple minded, is my theory. It's a correlation of Alinsky #5.

Paragraphs are your friend, BTW.

On the other hand, one sentence 'paragraphs' are the sign of a sub-simian mind. A civilized man knows to condense related thoughts into something resembling a real paragraph.

You fail again, Charles Dickens.

[bagster]

Haha.

[gas_dr]

I was wondering when the triumvirate would be complete tonight and without fail might I give you ranlongster.

[bagster]

Most here have a history here, including myself. Many here I’ve known or read for at least two decades.

Ooops.

[gas_dr]

Give them a few minutes. They will make the evidence up

[CatHerd]

LOL, no doubt!

This “study” looks shady to me. See my #140. Also Jim Noble’s posts. I belatedly pinged him to my #140. Maybe you have thoughts on that?

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=140#140