The two studies supporting this conclusion are: (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
Synopsis/ money quotes follow
"Instead of stopping the virus, it appears that the mRNA vaccination programs around the world may have inadvertently made the virus more ubiquitous. ... This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. ...
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated. ...
Another study, published in July by a team of more than 20 German scientists, independently confirmed that successive COVID-19 shots and boosters were converting the immune response from the protective class of IgG response to the toleration class ... So the vaccine and booster program have ended up doing the opposite of what was intended to do: keeping people from getting sick. ... naturally acquired immunity appears to be stronger than vaccine acquired immunity, and the dangers of the vaccines themselves, especially for young people, suggest that the risks of vaccination far outweigh the benefits.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
But the booster shots were never necessary to produce tolerance: the study showed that the subjects started developing tolerance after only two doses. The vaccines may have helped desensitize the population to harmful inflammatory immune responses to COVID-19. They have played their part. There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal. There were two studies supporting this conclusion. (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
I’m sure CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, FOX, WSJ, NYT, WaPo will be all over this.
Dr. Scott Atlas (among many others) was saying this early during COVID. He was on Trump’s COVID team. He was mercilessly ridiculed and hounded forever until he was forced to quit Trump’s team.
Victor Davis Hanson (who is at Stanford’s Hoover Institution) says the ridicule and derision continued after he got back to Stanford. He was declared unfit to be a doctor and was threatened with loss of career and income.
Will these people ever apologize to Dr. Atlas and the many others that warned against this from the beginning?
So, the vaccine basically gives people COVID. Great.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
And how can you really KNOW that? Sounds like wishful thinking/excuse making to me.
One of the first things they ever said about COVID was -- some people die, some people get really sick, and some people just get the sniffles.
Pretending that the people who got jabbed are less likely to die and will be more likely to just get the sniffles seems pretty hard to prove.
Makes sense if the initial immunity was so great but quickly fell...it did NOT kill the virus...not one little bit...and looks like it killed your natural immunity in the process.
The problem with this kind of information is that those who have already joined the cult won’t read it and if they did they won’t believe it. I’ve got a brother-in-law who says he’s ready for the fifth shot when it comes out. I quit telling him anything, I quit sending him anything when he made it clear he thought I was a kook.
I’ve reached the point where I really don’t care what happens to the members of the fake vax cult
Rain is wet, the sun rises in the East, and COVID shots kill more people than they save....YAWN. Is there anyone out there that doesn’t know these 3 truisms?
First link falsifies article.
————First Link-———————
Vaccine boosting results in distinct, imprinted patterns of hybrid immunity with different combinations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Immune protection is boosted by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection in the triple-vaccinated, previously infection-naïve individuals, but this boosting is lost with prior Wuhan Hu-1 imprinting.
the people that claim the vaccines are “safe and effective” also claim men can cut off their junk and convert to women...
Country after highly-vaccinated country saw enormous spikes in Covid cases about a year after the vaccines began to be rolled out. Among them are Japan, Vietnam, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand.
People wanted a vaccine.
People expected a vaccine.
A vaccine offers reasonable protection against contracting the disease, and also blocks transmission of the virus to others.
The COVID jab does neither of these things.
So they changed the definition of "vaccine" to mean "something which helps you feel better when you get sick".
That's not Science. That's fraud.
OMICRON = MORONIC
DELTA OMICRON = MEDIA CONTROL
BTTT…
Where’s gas dr to tell me this is faulty research and the jabs are better than a healthy immune system?
PING
Vaccinated medical professionals in the West are more likely to become infected with Covid than the general population of Africa?
ha ha ha.
This study is retarded.
“Peer Reviewed” means there are no obvious flaws in the mechanics of the study.
It doesn’t mean the conclusions are correct.
I’m confused... So these guys think “two” is the magic number for the “vaccines”?
What about shots like JnJ,does that have a magic number of two also?
Has there ever been an actual vaccine that was actually beneficial getting it once or twice, but then constantly getting it was actually a strong negative result?