Posted on 08/05/2022 10:05:37 AM PDT by Blueflag
Here's the net - 'vaccines" kinda work, but there is no need to continue with successive boosters, and there is good science to support this.'
because of how the COVID "vaccines" work, the more you are 'vaccinated' and boosted the more likely you are to be infected, reinfected, and transmit COVID-XX. The article doesn't recommend against the initial vaccine, except for young people, but does present the logical conclusion : "There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal and medrxiv. The two studies supporting this conclusion are: (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
Synopsis/ money quotes follow
"Instead of stopping the virus, it appears that the mRNA vaccination programs around the world may have inadvertently made the virus more ubiquitous. ...
This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. ...
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated. ...
Another study, published in July by a team of more than 20 German scientists, independently confirmed that successive COVID-19 shots and boosters were converting the immune response from the protective class of IgG response to the toleration class ... So the vaccine and booster program have ended up doing the opposite of what was intended to do: keeping people from getting sick.
... naturally acquired immunity appears to be stronger than vaccine acquired immunity, and the dangers of the vaccines themselves, especially for young people, suggest that the risks of vaccination far outweigh the benefits.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
But the booster shots were never necessary to produce tolerance: the study showed that the subjects started developing tolerance after only two doses. The vaccines may have helped desensitize the population to harmful inflammatory immune responses to COVID-19. They have played their part. There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal. There were two studies supporting this conclusion. (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
A tad wonky about immunology, but good stuff.
Vaccinated medical professionals in the West are more likely to become infected with Covid than the general population of Africa?
ha ha ha.
This study is retarded.
“Peer Reviewed” means there are no obvious flaws in the mechanics of the study.
It doesn’t mean the conclusions are correct.
The data show that, not the mechanism of the study.
If the conclusions are wrong from the data, that’s one thing, bad study is another. Which is it?
That gasbag is nothing more than a tied-up bundle of sticks.
Not everyone will know what that means......
I’m confused... So these guys think “two” is the magic number for the “vaccines”?
What about shots like JnJ,does that have a magic number of two also?
Has there ever been an actual vaccine that was actually beneficial getting it once or twice, but then constantly getting it was actually a strong negative result?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.