Lots of Americans don’t take care of themselves. They also think it’s too expensive to get consistent screening.
When you start cancer treatment late in the process….you will have bad outcomes.
We certainly know how to prevent it, and at least 50% is preventable. Does that count ?
Doctors are too busy navigating you.
Somebody’s going to attract unwanted attention and possibly professional persecution for daring to point out what some of us have - for YEARS - been stating ad nauseam.
Same goes for heart disease and alzheimer’s, etc. (ESPECIALLY the latter: I have an unpublished 12k word article exposing the stark reality of AZ fundraising/research)
When the primary tools in the toolbox to fight against cancer are chemo, and radiation and they both have a high failure rate, it is no surprise. See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852245/ Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs. This meta analysis cites a failure rate of 90% (+ or - 5).
Also see: Malignant: How Bad Policy and Bad Evidence Harm People with Cancer Illustrated Edition
by Vinayak K. Prasad (Author) https://www.amazon.com/Malignant-Policy-Evidence-People-Cancer/dp/1421437635/ref=monarch_sidesheet
The article actually calls out the high cost of the drugs in the US, which continues to show we are subsidizing the world’s use of them.
We are still in the stone ages in cancer treatment. Cut, burn, poison.
We have made some advances on certain cancers, but most forms are still taking lives with impunity.
You can be sure,with a 200 billion a year industry there will never be a Cure from Big Pharma.
Imagine the hate the media would spew if the people saying this were not far-left academia Democrats.
Every step of the process is for profit. No surprise we spend more than countries with government medicine.
The American taxpayer is lining the pockets of the CDC officials and other medical agencies by funding payoffs.
I believe that if there were a comlete CURE for every type of cancer known today, the American Cancer Society would do their best to cover it up, hide it, do anything they could to keep it off the market because it would upset their continual gravy train.
Remember Ivermectin and how they laughed themselves silly over that horse medicine? Well, there is a similar cure for cancer, but shush, don’t tell anyone.
https://www.laurasmercantile.com/is-joe-tippens-still-cancer-free-update-2022/
Ungrateful people can’t see the forest for the tress.
The improvement in cancer treatment over the decades has been tremendous.
Almost miraculous.
It’s mainly due to figuring out how to most effectively use chemotherapy drugs, which has been empirically based and incremental.
It’s still a hard disease to overcome.
Cancer and heart disease are the AMA’s two biggest cash cows. They will never give them up.
Follow the money.
More specifically, given that the states have never expressly constitutionally authorized the federal government to tax and spend in the name of cancer care, the states uniquely having the 10th Amendment-protected power to tax and spend for such a purpose imo, do the feds at least have the constitutionally required receipts to prove that this money is reasonably being spent for that purpose?
"Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time."
"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the congressional record, by Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment ...
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
The Congressional Budget Office needs to be required by law to publicly announce, within a timeframe defined by law, when an appropriations bill includes spending for things that cannot be reasonably justified under Congress's Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
"In every event, I would rather construe so narrowly as to oblige the nation to amend, and thus declare what powers they would agree to yield, than too broadly, and indeed, so broadly as to enable the executive and the Senate to do things which the Constitution forbids." —Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
Insights welcome.
Also, Trump's red tsunami of patriot supporters are reminded that they must vote twice this election year. Your first vote is to primary career RINO incumbents in federal and state governments. Your second vote is to replace outgoing Democrats and RINOs with Trump-endorsed patriot candidates.
Again, insights welcome.
There need to be progress payments. Anything less is simply padding salaries.
A 1994 study proved that chemo doesn’t work, for 97% of the cases.
I realize that’s been a while...but, I doubt the % has changed, drastically.
Here’s a good vid, that was recently sent to me, explaining much, from several years ago.....
https://www.brighteon.com/824f0144-d7b7-4cd5-8029-e32264c25ccc
Abusers turn institutions on the abusers.