When people argue using feelings, that is not logic, reason, moral, fair or consistent what they seek. People flee into the realm of feelings and fallacies like the MSM does all the time when their arguments are weak, when logic and reason is not on their side, when morality tells them it is wrong, when they know they are inconsistent, what they believe in is economically dysfunctional, unnatural, and historically hasn't worked.
Look at climate change, Covid, gun control... Lot's of feelings. Little on the actual facts. Why do you think that is? How do you argue for climate change using facts if the models are fake or proven wrong again and again. Do you really want to discuss correlation vs. causality as it pertains to climate change? Is a conversation about who is profiting (politically and economically) from all of this climate change nonsense a discussion “believers” really want to have? Are the contradictions and uncovered cheating and lies something the “believer” wants to discuss?
These are the sensible arguments for climate change, covid, or yes abortion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVlRompc1yE
Why do you think the media digs up a 10 year old that got pregnant from rape? Sensible?
Your sensible sounds like emotional junk to me, sorry.
Your personal morality means zilch. Only thing that counts is what majority of Americans want. And majority do not want late term abortions and majority do not want complete ban on abortions. If extremists like you go away, the country could adopt a sensible plan restricting abortions and thus save many unborn lives and the excruciating pain the fully formed fetus feels when the skull is pierced with a sharp object.