Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TChad
Those dots may show that someone's phone was near the nonprofit, but that is not proof of a crime. It's not even close. It's a joke.

It's only a joke to someone not paying attention. How about the time they were standing in front of the non-profit into the wee hours of the morning? Was that their gramdma's house next door to the non-profit they were standing in front of? Did all of those mules have the same grandma? Did they all suddenly decide to start visiting Grandma several times a day very late at night starting two weeks before the election?

Phone tracking and geo-fencing isn't rocket science, and law enforcement uses it all the time to sort out possible suspects to a crime. It was good enough to arrest many people for the Jan 6 "insurrection" so it should certainly hold water here.

104 posted on 05/19/2022 1:33:57 AM PDT by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: eastexsteve; TChad

You both may find these interesting: (and please, don’t give me “oh, you’re using Twitter as a source?”. Don’t be lazy like that. These are actual screenshots from the film, it doesn’t matter the user/source/whatever showing it. I’ve seen the film too, I know these are accurate and believe the same. This Twitter user is not me for the record too):

https://twitter.com/PokerPolitics/status/1527320940706603008?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

https://twitter.com/PokerPolitics/status/1527320946285375489?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

https://twitter.com/PokerPolitics/status/1527320959920721920?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

Generally speaking, the “maps” shown in the video of dropoxes are made up. Total fabrications:

https://twitter.com/PokerPolitics/status/1527097679603548160?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

Here’s proof that the radius TTV used to “link” cellphones to locations (dropboxes and NGO’s) was “100 feet” NOT, “3 meters” (~10 feet) as they claimed in the movie.

https://twitter.com/AngryFleas/status/1521862156161105920?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

Now maybe they changed their methodology between 2021 and the movie, but they never said in the movie they changed anything in their methodology. They just said they used a “3 meter radius”. I know, because again, I watched the movie. Prove to me, with sources, that they changed their methodology, because again, they don’t say they did in the movie, so the movie isn’t itself proof they changed it. It’s only proof they are claiming a different resolution radius without explanation.

As TChad said, there is no video of the same person at multiple drop boxes in the film:

https://twitter.com/PamelaEdwards/status/1525485072136257538?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

In fact, 3 of the “2000 Mules” have already been “exonerated”:

https://twitter.com/PamelaEdwards/status/1526659354237321216?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww

How many more need to be “investigated” to show the methodology in the film is faulty?

I could go on, but I’m tired, tired of always “doing my own research” only to find every time it’s based on evidence worthy only of leftists.

Here’s a list of all the numerous times Q has been wrong just for the heck of it, maybe it’ll knock some sense into someone on this site:

https://twitter.com/PokerPolitics/status/1135811817073270785?s=20&t=zqB2UUAgS5u6GdbKVQD6ww


105 posted on 05/19/2022 5:20:07 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson