Posted on 05/17/2022 5:22:04 PM PDT by RandFan
Dinesh D'Souza of 2000mules.com joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the evidence presented in his film proving Joe Biden's election was illegitimate.
Segment... [32 mins]
(Excerpt) Read more at banned.video ...
Sure they did. Watch it again.
Yes, it does. It goes into sufficient detail. Watch it again if you have to.
Exactly.
The overall federal system sanitizes fraud. The handoff from the several state governments to the federal government is the moment in time when questions about validuty, legitimacy, and potential fraud need to be asked and answered. If that transition occurs and passes without substantial incident, and the federal VP accepts the votes, the process is basically over (pending inauguration day). No backsies!
If Bribem has proved one thing, America doesn’t need a president to “run” things. We really don’t need a “leader” anymore.
Did ML have Kathy on his show?
Bleeding Kansas was a real conflict with serious consequences but took place before Kansas was a state. Territories play no role in POTUS elections. All parties are established components of the federal system. The stability of the process is an important feature that none of the states or the federal government will wish to disturb, the goal being a seamless transition from one federal executive administration to the next. If Bleeding Ksnsas suggests anything it is that the rile of the VP need not remsin purely ministerial as it traditionally has been but that, for good and substantial reasons, the federal VP is empowered to send a state’s tally back to the state with a request that they investigate alleged fraud and, if necessary, re-run the original electoral slate selection process, followed by re-voting if the other candidate’s electoral slate ends up being put in place. A year and a half later? Now is no time to envision a do-over. Fix the process and do better the next time. Really—we need to move on to fix the individual state systems, plus the VP needs to stop acting like a mere clerk. Pence was the problem in this scenario.
“It’s persuasive but would have been more so if he’d have shown ONE mule traveling to multiple drop boxes.”
I haven’t seen it yet, but heard a couple interviews that stated that at least one mule traveled among several counties, to multiple boxes, in one night. Maybe it wasn’t mentioned verbatim in the film. I don’t know.
I kicked everyone on your list to the curb a long time ago. They make me ill.
As of now, I get my info from Steve Bannon on War Room and his regulars. And FreeRepublic.
This should be an interesting thread
…
It should expose some quitters as well.
I’m seeing stuff in this country that I never thought I’d ever see here.
It’s mind-blowing.
And yet some part of the country thinks everything is fine and normal.
It was mentioned, but the footage/evidence of that wasn’t actually shown. And that would have been more persuasive if it had been.
nor are they tolerant of government corruption.
They seem pretty tolerant to me.
That is pretty limiting. But it is what I do as well. We need more voices out there. So it was nice to see Alex Jones jump in.
Those lawsuits will appear just as soon as True the Vote follows through on its promise to release the names of the nonprofit organizations that provided phony ballots to the mules. Those organizations will then sue TTV into oblivion. I think TTV will never release the names of the nonprofits, and the promise is a lie.
Note the part of the video where Dinesh says any ballot delivery that is paid for means that the vote is illegal. That makes the issue of which side the vote was for irrelevant.
I have seen the film three times. It does not show what it pretends to show. I wish it did.
True the Vote purchased one petabyte of geotracking data -- a gigantic collection of numbers -- and somehow turned those numbers into mule maps. That was an extraordinary achievement, yet 2000 Mules tells us nothing about how it was accomplished. The film shows no video of the TTV computer labs. There are no interviews with the technicians who did all that work. We are told nothing about the expertise of those technicians. Were they even slightly qualified to do the work? Had they done similar work in the past? Exactly what processes did they use to get all that data to reveal its secrets? GIVE US THE DETAILS! Did they consider alternative explanations for the geospatial data other than TTV's mule hypothesis? Where is the critique of TTV's results by an independent expert in geospatial data analysis?
TTV's and D'Souza's answer to all that: "Trust us." Well, I don't trust them.
TTV and D'Souza should be providing details galore to convincingly demonstrate that they had proved their mule hypothesis. Instead we get D'Souza repeating, "Geospatial tracking can be very accurate!"
I think the details are being withheld because they don't exist.
As always, the problem with the Dems is that they believe “by any means necessary” is in the Bible.
Based on what?
Based on the fact that the "proof" TTV has of mules picking up ballots at nonprofits is dots on maps. Those dots may show that someone's phone was near the nonprofit, but that is not proof of a crime. It's not even close. It's a joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.