Fraud vitiates the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).
The Twits don’t want a valid sample size, just one they can work with to get the result they need.
Boy they must REALLY be hiding something bigger than we think.
This behavior suggests to me its something criminal.
Anyone with a passing knowledge of statistics knows that the smaller the sample size the greater the chance of an erroneous outcome {of a favorable one is the samples have been selected and not random}.
But even if the '100 random users' were random, the first filter that twatter has to have is one that separates the real from the bots.
You could flip a coin ten times and get ten heads, but if you flip it 1000 times, it will even out.
If you get 1000 heads, you didn't check out the two headed coin.
This is how old you have to be to smell the lawyers!
What about the self generated bots that are removed from and are not part of the sample group at all?
How dumb. Twitter is software. It would be no more of a task to pull 10,000 than 100 for a sample.
Elon Musk is soon going to find out Twitter is controlled by the CIA and is nothing but a propaganda arm of the Deep State.
This is becoming absurd. Just buy the company Musk. Then you can do what you want. I don’t understand why it’s on hold and why he then said he is committed to buying.
Have they tried sampling “mail-in” tweets? They’re usually pretty reliable.
Twitter isn’t the only using fake accounts many questions have been asked about Facebook money flows fast to keep things mum.
fascinating
If Musk legal team want to sample for fake accounts they should look at those that ticker spam Stock Symbols.
I bet you could sample a 100 and get over 25 percent...lolol
My cat is seriously ticked.
Are her cat Friends @catsoftwitter really cats?
Or fleas?
$$%^^@$^&* and a big hisssssssss.