Confidential Pfizer Docs. reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby; but Pfizer claimed: “No safety signals emerged”

dailyexpose.uk ^ | MAY 9, 2022 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

PING

[Reno89519]

How about credible sources for such the extreme claim. I’m not doubting the claim, but if 90% yes, that would be big news.

[dhs12345]

If this is proven to be accurate, I hope and pray that heads will roll. All of the media, the so called doctors and scientists, the government, etc. they own it.

[PMAS]

****

[grey_whiskers]

Smells like crimes against humanity.

[z3n]

“...but if 90% yes, that would be big news.”

~~~

Agree.
I don’t care how collusive and cohesive the propagandist media is, there’s no way a lid would stay on this.

I rarely outright scoff at an article but I’m doing so here.

[Pajamajan]

"If this is proven to be accurate, I hope and pray that heads will roll."

I hope so too. Outrageous that Big Pharma and their accomplices did so much damage.

[Jane Long]

Thanks.

They *tested* their horrid $hots on what, four (?) pregnant rats....and, this qualified for their safety approval/study???

Lock. Them. Up.

And....take anyone who has ever mocked these horrid adverse effects/warnings, with them.

[Vermont Lt]

270 pregnancies. 238 outcomes not reported.

And they conclude that almost all of them did not make it to term?

This is not good science. It’s like saying, “100% of the people that died are dead.”

[Diogenesis]

accomplices include

AMA, NEJM, CDC, FDA.

They all knew the “vaccines” were not vaccines,
and that they were genocidal.

... but the money was sooooooooooo good.
and the lambos made it worth lying and killing for them.

[dhs12345]

And may get away with it. The checks and balances were tossed out the window. The government is and was supposed to keep big pharma honest. They didn't. Of course, the Feds are in bed with big pharma so it is not surprising.

I wonder if the feds and the new government ministry of truth will shut down any bad press and prevent the truth from the public.

[TheDandyMan]

I guess the vaccinated women I know who have delivered healthy babies are just that lucky. >p>What a coincidence.

[dhs12345]

So much for the credibility of these once respected organizations.

However, I will give them the benefit of the doubt if they do an objective true scientific review of the qualification process and ALL of the statistics. I bet that they have done this but would never release it to the public. But if they did and admitted that there were errors (if true), then they would have gained back their credibility.

So....AMA, NEJM, CDC, FDA... you are up. And remember that any fudging of the data or lying will further hurt your credibility.

[NewJerseyJoe]

>> How about credible sources

The Pfizer source documents are linked right in the body of the article.

[roving]

If you bothered to go to the website, you would see where they got the info from

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

[roving]

The reason we have so many uniformed people are because they can’t be bothered to check out facts. The site linked directly to the study. Now, don’t you feel just a tiny bit silly?

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

[SoConPubbie]

I don’t care how collusive and cohesive the propagandist media is, there’s no way a lid would stay on this.

You just watched the Wall the media put up about the Vote Fraud of the 2020 election and you can state this with a straight face?

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Confidential Pfizer Docs. reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby; but Pfizer claimed: “No safety signals emerged”, Vermont Lt wrote:

270 pregnancies. 238 outcomes not reported.

And they conclude that almost all of them did not make it to term?

This is not good science. It’s like saying, “100% of the people that died are dead.”

 The fault is PFizer's. They had an obligation to report the outcomes. If they fail in their obligations, the public can take the proportion of outcomes for pregnancies Pfizer was willing to report and apply it to the missing portion. The ball is then in Pfizer's court - they can counter by reporting the previously withheld data. Yes, Pfizer withheld data - this isn't the first time they've done it. A 'vaccine' for the world and Pfizer just can't keep track of about half of all pregnancies to date? No published outcomes for those pregnancies 2 years down the line?

If Pfizer wants to - they can pony up. But Pfizer is running the same game as the CDC, FDA, NIH etc. They withhold data and try to make you prove them wrong. That's immoral and on this scale, with these impacts, its criminal.

And then there are people who only apply skepticism to EVERYTHING that goes against Biden's 'narrative' and give pharma's like Pfizer the benefit of the doubt every single time, despite their horrible record of corruption.

[Vermont Lt]

I am not defending Pfizer.

I am merely saying to be careful believing ANY of this stuff.

I recall my doc wanted to put me on statins. The materials all said it would reduce the risk of heart attack by X% (for arguments sake, let’s say it was 25%.).

But few people asked, “What are the chances of having a heart attack?” In my case, at my ages and my condition, the risk was about 3/4% for the next year. So the statins would decrease my risk of a heart attack to something like 1/2%.

I passed on the statins and just started walking. It did me a lot more good.

My point is that the average person isn’t going to read these report—nor do they understand the statistics. Then you have a person take the numbers and spin them to make a point.

Folks just need to be careful…read carefully, and talk to medical staff you trust.