Confidential Pfizer Docs. reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby; but Pfizer claimed: “No safety signals emerged”

dailyexpose.uk ^ | MAY 9, 2022 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

The confidential Pfizer documents that the FDA have been forced to publish by court order reveal that 82% to 97% of women who were mistakenly exposed to the mRNA Covid-19 injection either suffered a miscarriage or suffered having to witness the death of their newborn child upon giving birth.

But Pfizer claimed – “There were no safety signals that emerged from the review of these cases of use in pregnancy”.

 

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on their website. The latest drop happened on May 2nd 2022.

One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 12 of the confidential document contains data on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection in pregnancy and lactation.

Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.

One-hundred-and-forty-six of those mother cases did not immediately report the immediate occurrence of any clinical adverse event. But 124 of the 270 mother cases did. Meaning 46% of the mothers exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.

Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal death.

A total of 4 serious foetus/baby cases were reported due to exposure to the Pfizer injection. The 4 serious cases involved the following events –

• Foetal growth restriction x2
• Premature baby x2
• Neonatal Death x1

But here’s where things get rather concerning. Pfizer state that of the 270 pregnancies they have absolutely no idea what happened in 238 of them.

But here are the known outcomes of the remaining pregnancies –

• Spontaneous Abortion (miscarriage) x23,
• Outcome pending x5,
• Premature baby with neonatal death x 2,
• Spontaneous Abortion with intrauterine death x2,
• Spontaneous Abortion with neonatal death x 1
• Normal outcome x1

There were 34 outcomes altogether at the time of the report, but 5 of them were still pending. Pfizer note that only 1 of the 29 known outcomes were normal, whilst 28 of the 29 outcomes resulted in the loss/death of the baby. This equates to 97% of all known outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child.

When we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child. This equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figure.

That 82% figure is, however, very interesting when we consider the outcome of another study conducted by the Centers for Disease Controls V-Safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. A study that was used to justify not just offering, but harassing pregnant women to get the Covid-19 injection in the UK.

We exclusively revealed in July 2021 how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population.

Source

However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of pregnancy.

This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first/second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.

 

Source

But there’s that 82% number again. So that’s two sets of data, Pfizer’s confidential data, and the CDC’s manipulated study that show the rate of pregnancy loss following Covid-19 vaccination to be 82%. Just a coincidence?

Highly unlikely when we consider what else Medicine Regulators and Pfizer tried to cover up.

A ‘Freedom of Information’ request alongside an in-depth dive into the only pregnancy/fertility study performed on the Pfizer Covid-19 injection reveals that Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid the dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy because the study found it increases the risk of birth defects and infertility.

You can read the full investigation here, but here’s a snippet of what should have been included in official public documents, and subsequently wasn’t –

Source

The FDA’S decision not to act on Pfizer’s data, and the cover-up of the animal study findings by both Pfizer and Medicine Regulators around the world has led to 4,113 foetal deaths being reported in the USA alone as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections as of 22nd April 2022.

And take a look at this data coming out of Scotland –

Click to enlarge

Public Health Scotland (PHS) has a full dashboard on Covid-19 wider impacts on the health care system, found here, and it includes a whole range of data from mental health statistics to pregnancies, cardiovascular disorders data, and cancer.

Official figures reveal that the rate of neonatal deaths increased to 4.6 per 1000 live births in March 2022, a 119% increase on the expected rate of deaths. This means the neonatal mortality rate breached an upper warning threshold known as the ‘control limit’ for the second time in at least four years.

The last time it breached was in September 2021, when neonatal deaths per 1000 live births climbed to 5.1. Although the rate fluctuates month to month, the figure for both September 2021 and March 2022 is on a par with levels that were last typically seen in the late 1980s.

Public Health Scotland (PHS) has not formally announced they have launched an investigation, but this is what they are supposed to do when the upper warning threshold is reached, and they did so back in 2021.

At the time, PHS said the fact that the upper control limit has been exceeded “indicates there is a higher likelihood that there are factors beyond random variation that may have contributed to the number of deaths that occurred”. You can read more here.

We either have a serious issue here or a bucket load of terrible coincidences, and it’s all arisen thanks to this unbelievable claim made by Pfizer in their confidential documents in response to 82% to 97% of women mistakenly exposed to the Covid-19 injection during pregnancy losing their child –

“There were no safety signals that emerged from the review of these cases of use in pregnancy and while breast feeding.”

See for yourself on pages 12 and 13 of the confidential document found here.

 

[ransomnote]

PING

[Reno89519]

How about credible sources for such the extreme claim. I’m not doubting the claim, but if 90% yes, that would be big news.

[dhs12345]

If this is proven to be accurate, I hope and pray that heads will roll. All of the media, the so called doctors and scientists, the government, etc. they own it.

[PMAS]

****

[grey_whiskers]

Smells like crimes against humanity.

[z3n]

“...but if 90% yes, that would be big news.”

~~~

Agree.
I don’t care how collusive and cohesive the propagandist media is, there’s no way a lid would stay on this.

I rarely outright scoff at an article but I’m doing so here.

[Pajamajan]

"If this is proven to be accurate, I hope and pray that heads will roll."

I hope so too. Outrageous that Big Pharma and their accomplices did so much damage.

[Jane Long]

Thanks.

They *tested* their horrid $hots on what, four (?) pregnant rats....and, this qualified for their safety approval/study???

Lock. Them. Up.

And....take anyone who has ever mocked these horrid adverse effects/warnings, with them.

[Vermont Lt]

270 pregnancies. 238 outcomes not reported.

And they conclude that almost all of them did not make it to term?

This is not good science. It’s like saying, “100% of the people that died are dead.”

[Diogenesis]

accomplices include

AMA, NEJM, CDC, FDA.

They all knew the “vaccines” were not vaccines,
and that they were genocidal.

... but the money was sooooooooooo good.
and the lambos made it worth lying and killing for them.

[dhs12345]

And may get away with it. The checks and balances were tossed out the window. The government is and was supposed to keep big pharma honest. They didn't. Of course, the Feds are in bed with big pharma so it is not surprising.

I wonder if the feds and the new government ministry of truth will shut down any bad press and prevent the truth from the public.

[TheDandyMan]

I guess the vaccinated women I know who have delivered healthy babies are just that lucky. >p>What a coincidence.

[dhs12345]

So much for the credibility of these once respected organizations.

However, I will give them the benefit of the doubt if they do an objective true scientific review of the qualification process and ALL of the statistics. I bet that they have done this but would never release it to the public. But if they did and admitted that there were errors (if true), then they would have gained back their credibility.

So....AMA, NEJM, CDC, FDA... you are up. And remember that any fudging of the data or lying will further hurt your credibility.

[NewJerseyJoe]

>> How about credible sources

The Pfizer source documents are linked right in the body of the article.

[roving]

If you bothered to go to the website, you would see where they got the info from

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

[roving]

The reason we have so many uniformed people are because they can’t be bothered to check out facts. The site linked directly to the study. Now, don’t you feel just a tiny bit silly?

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

[SoConPubbie]

I don’t care how collusive and cohesive the propagandist media is, there’s no way a lid would stay on this.

You just watched the Wall the media put up about the Vote Fraud of the 2020 election and you can state this with a straight face?

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Confidential Pfizer Docs. reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby; but Pfizer claimed: “No safety signals emerged”, Vermont Lt wrote:

270 pregnancies. 238 outcomes not reported.

And they conclude that almost all of them did not make it to term?

This is not good science. It’s like saying, “100% of the people that died are dead.”

 The fault is PFizer's. They had an obligation to report the outcomes. If they fail in their obligations, the public can take the proportion of outcomes for pregnancies Pfizer was willing to report and apply it to the missing portion. The ball is then in Pfizer's court - they can counter by reporting the previously withheld data. Yes, Pfizer withheld data - this isn't the first time they've done it. A 'vaccine' for the world and Pfizer just can't keep track of about half of all pregnancies to date? No published outcomes for those pregnancies 2 years down the line?

If Pfizer wants to - they can pony up. But Pfizer is running the same game as the CDC, FDA, NIH etc. They withhold data and try to make you prove them wrong. That's immoral and on this scale, with these impacts, its criminal.

And then there are people who only apply skepticism to EVERYTHING that goes against Biden's 'narrative' and give pharma's like Pfizer the benefit of the doubt every single time, despite their horrible record of corruption.

[Vermont Lt]

I am not defending Pfizer.

I am merely saying to be careful believing ANY of this stuff.

I recall my doc wanted to put me on statins. The materials all said it would reduce the risk of heart attack by X% (for arguments sake, let’s say it was 25%.).

But few people asked, “What are the chances of having a heart attack?” In my case, at my ages and my condition, the risk was about 3/4% for the next year. So the statins would decrease my risk of a heart attack to something like 1/2%.

I passed on the statins and just started walking. It did me a lot more good.

My point is that the average person isn’t going to read these report—nor do they understand the statistics. Then you have a person take the numbers and spin them to make a point.

Folks just need to be careful…read carefully, and talk to medical staff you trust.