A Weekly Dose of President Trump- Trump Family Train May 1, 2022

Good morning, lysie!

Yum, all my breakfast favorites are covered, thanks.

Hope you woke this morning pain free.

4,901 posted on 05/22/2022 5:10:25 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)

Good morning, exit. You are welcome. Yesterday’s steak dinners at The Legion went well. I’m hoping to rest today.

4,902 posted on 05/22/2022 5:14:21 AM PDT by lysie (Labeling Trump supporters domestic terrorists is like calling trick or treaters robbers.They are NOT)

To: Lakeside Granny

Good morning, Gran. You are welcome. Still sore , but I’ll be fine.

4,903 posted on 05/22/2022 5:17:10 AM PDT by lysie (Labeling Trump supporters domestic terrorists is like calling trick or treaters robbers.They are NOT)

Yes, we will.

We just weren’t our usual chattiness yesterday.

Good morning, exit!

4,904 posted on 05/22/2022 5:22:07 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)

Good Morning lysie, thank you for the well wishes and the lovely breakfast.

Hope and pray you feel better dear heart.

4,905 posted on 05/22/2022 5:42:45 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer (WINNING is not getting old!!! ❤️USA❤️)

To: sweetiepiezer

Good morning, sweetie!

Who believes this? Nice try Hitlery.

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)
@KingMakerFT

The new, officially declared Clintonista narrative is that 1) Hillary approved the plan for the Campaign to give to the press as much dirt on Trump as could be conjured up, linking him to Russia;

2) It didn’t matter whether it was true; the press could be counted on to vet it;

3) Nobody in the campaign wanted any of it to be given to the FBI or other Govt agencies- at least not by the Campaign- and 4) When rogue agents and attorneys such as Steele and Sussmann did feed the made up dirt to the FBI, they did so without the Campaign’s knowledge or consent

So now the die is cast. By Mook acknowledging under oath that Hillary approved the media portion of this “swift boat project,” the Clinton camp has chosen the hill they think they can defend against Durham’s conspiracy investigation: It was against their interest to go to the FBI

4,906 posted on 05/22/2022 5:55:25 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)

To: Lakeside Granny

Good morning, LG!

But they needed the FBI to give the story credence.

And the press vetting any story—hah!

Can’t have it both ways—unless you are a Clinton.

4,907 posted on 05/22/2022 6:00:50 AM PDT by exit82 (Either the Democrat Party will survive or America will survive. But not both.)

Something I have noticed, Hitlery is being very quiet.

Not seeing any tweets from her.

4,908 posted on 05/22/2022 6:06:24 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)

To: Lakeside Granny

Hillary Clinton’s sordid legacy of lies

By Michael Goodwin

Proving that what’s old is new again, here is how the late William Safire began his New York Times column of Jan. 8, 1996:

“Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady — a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation — is a congenital liar.

“Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.”

Safire detailed a series of situations where Hillary Clinton was caught in obvious lies, and there is a straight line to the Hillary Clinton whose shadow hangs over the Michael Sussmann trial in Washington. Once again, Clinton is being exposed as “compelled to mislead” and ensnaring “her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.”

And to think she almost got away with stealing the presidency.

It is in keeping with her history that she is portrayed as the off-stage chief conniver at a trial that is, like her, something of a throwback. Coming six years after the 2016 presidential campaign, the Sussmann trial inevitably carries an air of anti-climax.

After all, we have known since the Robert Mueller report in 2019 that the charge that Donald Trump colluded with Russia was fake news. And we have known for almost as long that Clinton’s campaign secretly funded the smear merchants at Fusion GPS who hired Christopher Steele who fabricated a “dossier” that was long on lies and gossip and short on facts.

Finally, we have known that Jim Comey’s FBI was punch drunk on power and some of its top officials were foaming at the mouth to help Clinton defeat Trump. They were so dirty they used the rancid dossier to get court approval to spy on Trump’s campaign.

That sequence adds a strange dimension to the Sussmann case in the sense that the only charge against him — that he lied to the FBI in denying he was working for Clinton in trying to peddle Russia trash — makes the agency look innocent, when it was, in its own way, as guilty as Clinton.

Still, there is value in special counsel John Durham’s tireless effort to reveal the secrets of the dirtiest dirty trick ever. His assignment was to probe how and why the FBI took the unprecedented step of spying on the campaign of the opposing party’s presidential candidate and while the going has been slow, he is adding important details to a major stain on our national history.

The Biden administration would surely love to shut Durham down, but convicting Sussmann likely would give the prosecutor new impetus and save his probe from the Democrats’ ax.

It is vital that he continue because, although it failed to elect Clinton, the hoax was sensationally successful in capturing the media’s attention and implanting a deep distrust of Trump, thanks in part to the Deep State’s anonymous sources who fed media hysterics.

Democrats, especially Nancy Pelosi, insisted Trump was an illegitimate president for his entire term. One result was that the party refused to negotiate with him, robbing America of any meaningful bipartisanship even on issues like infrastructure.