Posted on 04/11/2022 11:45:19 AM PDT by ransomnote
I do apologize to all the rats I’ve shot. And this reminds me of Dick Armey’s line about how he’d been in Washington for a week and caught himself trying to spend some of his own money.
china ended its 1 child per couple in 2015.
Noice mems ya got there...be a shame if someone stole them.
Just sayin’
Why don’t you stop paying attention to Sather, then, since you don’t like him?
He provides evidence proving shills, scammers and fake MAGA people, and there is no indication at all that he is of their ilk.
You disagree, your right to do so. And my right to post what he says. Free will and freedom of thought and speech yay!
arg...sorry...I should have checked the “view replies” first.
re China:....there are consequences to keeping half your population as less than citizens....which is why in China girl babies are aborted and/or killed outright at birth.....
<> Indeed! What a pathetic list of unpresidentials. <>
I didn’t look...so Romney was on the list ?
BIDEN Pentagon In Talks With 8 Top Weapons Manufacturers.
— Reuters
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
quid pro joe on another roll
good ones
Nope. No pierre delecto. From the link:
Below are our latest rankings.
10. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: She would have a built-in base.
9. Gavin Newsom: Newsom practically exudes “West Coast liberal.”
8. Cory Booker: The senator from New Jersey.
7. Sherrod Brown: The biggest shock of the early 2020 Democratic primary.
6. Roy Cooper: He might be the one leading contender you hear the least about.
5. Amy Klobuchar: The senator from Minnesota would seem to benefit from a Biden-free race.
4. Elizabeth Warren: The senator from Massachusetts.
3. Kamala Harris: Being vice president is certainly a good launchpad, but it’s not at all clear Harris has put it to good use.
2. Pete Buttigieg: The transportation secretary moves ahead of Harris, but not with any great conviction on our part.
1. President Biden: Mostly, we just wonder whether we’ll see him try to become the first-ever octogenarian presidential nominee
.
thanx.
I didn’t mean to make you work.
I cudda clicked on the link.
ah...no Bernie cause he’s not a RAT. He’ll run again and promise to pledge as a RAT again...
Many will now get me put in jail again o. Fb! But they were too good not to share.
My understanding about the availablilty of girls vs. boys for adoption was that the male children were more likely to help provide for their parents. That’s a really simplistic explanation - there are additional reasons, but when only one child is allowed, parents will give up the girl and try again for a boy.
I think it was possible to adopt a boy when there were health issues with the baby.
I looked at it a bit and decided it was a bit too far out there. We have to be careful who we follow. There are many who are not trustworthy and are just making stuff up for various reasons, none of which are worth our serious consideration.
Just my opinion, of course. Make up your own minds.
After 2 generations and 30 years...but there were other restrictions that aren’t as often discussed. See my 1184 here: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4054130/posts?page=1184#1184
Great images
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.