Official U.K. Lab Report confirms Covid-19 Vaccines definitely contain Graphene Oxide

dailyexpose.uk ^ | FEBRUARY 13, 2022 | PATRICIA HARRITY

[ransomnote]

The Covid-19 vaccines have been forensically examined in the United Kingdom and a laboratory report confirms they contain graphene nanomaterials that can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and damage the central nervous system, and Graphene Oxide which can damage internal organs, destroy blood health, trigger cancer, and cause changes in gene function among a host of other ill effects.

Following her own experience with patients who had suffered apparent vaccine injury and adverse reactions, a British Medical Practitioner came forward in December 2021 offering to assist in an investigation to ascertain whether the results discovered by Dr’s Noack and Campra could be replicated in the UK and also to examine the COVID-19 injection vials for discovery of toxins or unexpected contents.

The medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery in which she works and handed it to an independent investigator assisting in investigating cases relating to injury sustained as a result of injections given as part of the roll out.

Further vials have since been obtained which cover the three main manufacturers in the UK: Pfizer,
Moderna and AstraZeneca.

The contents of the injection vials have been forensically examined and a laboratory report has now been officially published.

The report titled “Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines” has been presented to the Police involved in the UK Criminal Case, 6029679/21, which is said to provide them with more than enough reasonable suspicion that serious indictable offences have been committed regarding the administration of experimental treatments.

The report contains the toxicology reports of injection vials that have been forensically examined, with findings that provide “more than enough grounds” for the Police to apply for the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Warrant and seize injection vials for themselves.

The Police will then be able to submit them to a Home Office Laboratory with a view to replicate the findings and will enable them to possess their own hard evidence to support serious indictable offences.

Additionally, the police, in line with the duty of care to the public, have been asked to request the immediate cessation of the experimental treatment rollout.

The Report: Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines – by UNIT

Four vaccine vials were the subject of the investigation.

Two Moderna samples, and 1 AstraZeneca, and 1 Pfizer sample were collected for examination in order to analyse the contents and identify if undeclared components were present in them.

Here is the list of declared ingredients in each vaccine by the manufacturers –

The inclusions that are not declared by the manufacturers were the focus for this particular analysis, primarily graphene and carbon-related nanostructures in form of carbon or graphene composites, graphene in association with polyethylene glycol, graphene oxide, iron oxide compounds, and calcite.

The Four Vials

The analysis of all four vial contents identified objects that are similar and have been defined and illustrated within the report individually.

The Identified inclusions were:

1. Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol
2. Graphene Composite Form 1.
3. Graphene Composite Form 2.
4. Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions.
5. Graphene Nano Form with and without fluorescence
6. Graphene nano objects
7. Graphene nano scrolls

Moderna 01

The first sample that was evaluated was the Moderna 01 which was examined by Raman spectroscopy. The investigation clearly showed that all the inclusions within the vaccine have a strong carbon signal with confirmed graphene compositions of some representative forms.

Two clear signals were obtained from two objects. The flat ribbon-like inclusions exhibited clear graphene spectra integrated with the spectrum of glycol and other minor compounds. The other clear signal was obtained from a calcite microcrystalline form and Carbon composite forms also had a clear graphene signal.

It is important to point out that some nano amorphous carbon forms showed a clear Graphene signal, however, these forms also exhibited fluorescence which masked the Graphene peak.

Moderna 02

Particles that carry the mRNA load were clearly seen and Graphene composite 01 was prominently present even at low resolution and Graphene Nano objects were present in “great abundance.” within the vial sample.

AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca was the third vaccine that was evaluated for its inclusion, and as it was almost transparent it made “spotting of inherent colours slightly easier”. Under wet microscopic observation, the solution exhibited instantaneous movement of nanoscopic particulate material which when observed closely seemed to be driven by convection current.

When dry, the particles exhibited traction movement. In figure, 3.21. the microscopic form is clearly visible as it is lying on top of the solid film while the nanoparticles are still in motion in the background as can be seen by the shifting position of the shadow. A clear output of this mechanism was that as the medium solidified, it became more difficult for the nanoparticles to navigate through the viscous material.

Confirmed inclusions within AstraZeneca were of the presence of Graphene in all the identified representative forms. The carbon composites are of two forms as they are in the Moderna vaccines. These two forms showed distinct graphene signatures. Also, besides Graphene the spectrum is dominated by iron oxide and other forms of carbon associations.

Pfizer

Pfizer was the fourth vaccine vial that was evaluated for its inclusions. The pipette specimen showed some extremely interesting inclusions. As the material was sucked into the pipette, distinct translucent to transparent sheets were seen floating about as seen in figure 3.28.

Three of these samples showed carbon composite signatures with possible graphene in. The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them. 

Ribbon forms of nearly transparent microforms are found in fair numbers in the slide. These are often half embedded in the solution with one end projecting outside the material. The carbon composites of both form 1 and 2 also are present in great numbers. Form 1 settles on top of the material while form 2 is found at mid-levels of the solidified medium. Graphene nanoforms are present in fair numbers within the slide material along with some scrolls. Figure 3.32. Representative inclusions found within Pfizer vaccine.

The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them. The graphene complex 1 is graphene with polyethylene glycol signal forming the bulk of the spectrum. Though, for initial assessments, this study can confirm the presence of graphene in Pfizer.

Notably, one of the samples that was shot, displayed a fair influence of fluorescence.

To Conclude

All three vaccines commonly employ the self-assembling lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery mechanisms. Where the central find of this project has been the confirmation of the presence of graphene in all four samples, it is important to evaluate this find in the context of the subject itself.

It is also important to mention, that the source of fluorescence within the samples was unknown while the investigations were underway, and due to tight timescales were not able to be investigated at the time.

An Open Access review highlighting the toxicity of the graphene family nanoparticles can be viewed here.

Source

In conclusion, it can be stated that the four samples of vaccines (Moderna 1, Modern 2, AstraZeneca, Pfizer) all contain significant amount of carbon composites, graphene compounds, and iron oxide.

These ingredients were undeclared by the manufacturers and are absent from the list of ingredients for the vaccines. However, studies show how dangerous the Graphene family is, yet individuals have not been made aware that they are being injected with the deadly substance.

The lab report can be read in full here.

 

[gas_dr]

I have never discounted that peoples concerns are not real. The concerns of liberty infringement, and overreach by Fauci and his minions are completely inappropriate and I speak against them everyday, both here and in my practice. I attempt to bring my over decade of doctoral and postdoctoral training and subsequent 20 or so years of practice to offer some insight that people may or may not have...

If you were terminated over disease of which you are now clearly immune, I would join you in your lawsuit, your fight, and your right to make a choice as it pertains to you. It is completely insane that without few exceptions someone who has had CoVID should have vaccinations. I have advised against vaccination for both friends and professionally if you have had the disease.

I am not laughing it up. I am deriding those who propose no rational discussion beyond name calling. I am so sorry you have to deal with the con game, and I support you and those in their fight against undue overreach. You know whats best for you, you can look at that data, and make a wise decision for yourself — better than anyone else can. This is my clearest and sincerest belief.

[gas_dr]

Come on, it wa a good barb at someone who enjoys throwing barbs at me. At least I should get a little credit for that...

[A strike]

Thanks for the very civil comment, but,
do you actually deny the ample evidence of deadly vaxx results?

(Yeah , I know, I know, not necessarily causation, but, com’ on man. worldwide soccer player just coincidentally dropping dead like flies on the field? Com’ o’ man !)

[gas_dr]

So I and others researched the prevalence of heart disease and sudden cardiac arrest in soccer players before and after the roll out of the vaccination — it is not statistically different.

Understanding athletic physiology and anatomy, there is an increased prevalence in connective tissue disorders in athletes.

Of course there are complications to the vaccination. Such is the nature of every vaccination. However, taken in the light of other vaccinations, I think the risk is about the same. However, knowing that the native disease tends to be prothrombic, it is not unrealistic that a complication of vaccination may be DVT / PE.

I genuinely believe that there is a risk benefit analysis in all therapeutics and vaccinations. It is how I practice medicine — evaluate the risk and benefit. Only if the benefits far outweigh the risks do I proceed with treatment. If the risks are equal to the benefits, I tend to err on the side of non-treatement.

That being said, I think we are so screwed up because of Fauci. Vaccination of adults with comorbities or advance age has an advantage. Vaccination of young adults to middle age who are healthy is an equal risk as benefit. Vaccinations of children and young adults is beyond reprehensible except in very rare cases.

We have to weigh some things with nuance, but this is not the stance of Fauci (the evil one) and as such, the government is applying the similar government one size fits all sledge hammer to the issue. This must be fought against, and I will continue to fight against it professionally and personally.

I hope you find this response reasonable.

[wgmalabama]

Everyone is dealing with this insanity and overreach the best they can. Many are being mentally abused over all of this. Have an understanding of that part of the equation. The power and edicts behind the vax makes people want to find faults with them to justify their natural rights to say hell no. Unfortunately they are being boxed in, forced, coerced…. Instead of ridicule, maybe a sympathetic understanding that it’s not right. That they have a choice. For some the answer is to take the vax risk (my mom and dad for example). My 25 yo son should never have been given the choice of fired or the shot.

I plead with you and DD to change your mocking into understanding and love. I plead with others to understand that others vax decisions were theirs. Unfortunately 100% mandates make people desperate to justify going all in. If that’s what they need so be it. Not everything with these vax are on the up and up. Too many sudden deaths near term to them. I have seen one vid death and 2 vax deaths and one that could go either way.

Love your brothers. Turn the cheek, understand their pain. It is your professional training. Show love and get love in response. You don’t have to agree with everything. We both agree that something is seriously wrong. We can feel it. We sense it. The Holy Spirit says it in our hearts. If you are as smart as I think you are. Look for it. I challenge you to do what God made you for. Is there micro chips, graphene, impurities, nano particles in the vax - idk. Yes for some by admission others WTFK. If you have access to the vax and equipment, give a look. If you know an open minded pathologist ask. People are dying from the disease and people are dying from the vax. Time is the unknown parameter.

I’m not taking it. It doesn’t work, has risks, hasn’t passed testing I care about …. That is my choice. You chose your choice. Good deal. Neither is wrong until we know the truth but so many are invested in lies. I may have to put my large (overpaid) salary on the line. Same with my wife.

Good luck.

[A strike]

Yes I find your response reasonable, though, “not statistically different.” I don’t believe.

“...it is not unrealistic that a complication of vaccination may be DVT/PE.”
Well then why in the hell should one support universal vaccination?

Also, is the VAERS death data just false?
or is it just the price for the 99.9+% survivable scamdemic?

Do you not believe the VAERS death data ???

[wgmalabama]

Your a anesthesiologist not a pathologist, virologists, or a general researcher. Why are you on a red / tiger team doing world wide analysis or statistical analysis of death rates in professions. That seems very odd.

I may have an issue with this.

[gas_dr]

I am a critical care physician, so please do understand that I am squarely on the playing field.

[NetAddicted]

Why are Freepers so afraid of the truth about the Covid-19 jab coming out? I’m guaging this by the keywords on this post.

[gas_dr]

You know, my friend, fair enough. I have answered all to human when being accused of being Mengele, a murderer, a quack (SW favorite stalking term). Thank you for reminding me to not me so salty. I will attempt to live my faith accordingly, sometimes it is a little hard to do amidst the unwarranted animosity.

I think we agree that your 25 yo son was done an injustice — see my dialogue with A strike. I absolutely stand with you that you alone have the best determination as to if you should be vaccinated — and I will support you in every way possible. We agree on freedom. We agree on many things.

I will try my best to not be salty, but please give forbearance when I am insulted without cause. I will try to take the high road - and you have provided an excellent reminder of what it means to be truly faithful. All the best to you and your wife.

[wgmalabama]

So you do global research and statistical analysis and pathologist determinations on sports players dying around the world. Amazing. You told me you were a anesthesiologist before.

[gas_dr]

VAERS is very difficult to ascertain what is going on. According the the VAERS database statement — it should not used as an objective tool for decision making because it is self reported. Do I think there is some nonsense being reported? I do think there is. But I am also not blind to the actual results of the vaccination. I can tell you I have not seen a critically ill vaccination complication. I think there are a lot of minor to moderate complications that are being reported, but are self limited. I can attest to the fact that I have see an awful lot off long COVID symptoms, but not long vaccination injuries. I keep my eye out for it as I am always looking to refine my knowledge.

To be clear, I think there are risks to the vaccination. But I think there is a population where the benefit justify the risk. I do not think this is actually 99.9% survival, (until omicron emerged which I think is a pandemic ender. I point out that in the past there have been reasonable well forecasted next variants on the horizon — currently there are none) I think her his a far worse survival rate (98% or so). But, I think it is also preventable and the survival cohort is clearly, younger and healthier. So there is not a need to vaccinate the long and healthy. I believe that actually targeting the vulnerable is the best use of science, and makes the most sense.

This is something that is lost on the medical bureaucracy.

[gas_dr]

No, I am not a pathologist, but I do understand prevalence and disease process. It is easy to study and research publications on the number of deaths in athletes as it is compared to the general populace, and the kinds of deaths that occur. I do not think it is controversial to point out there is a higher prevalence of connective tissue disorders in athletes than in the general public, and this also leads to risk of death in those with the disease.

While I am a critical care anesthesiologist (critical care is a subspecialty of the American Board of Anesthesiology, and I am board certified in both anesthesia and critical care), this is more general medical education that we are discussing.

As an aside, I think the wokeness of my certifying board is disgusting and I am firmly against the progressive bulls*t the board is advancing. I am pretty sure that its job is to certify as expert those who qualify any training and examination — and not to engage in my favorite new term — diversity. I am sickened by what the ABMS boards are considering as important in the year 2022.

[ransomnote]

A former PFizer employee said that Pfizer didn’t list graphene oxide in the PEGYlated Lipids because it they claimed it was a “trade secret” in which case you don’t have to list it. Poison - a trade secret so it’s not on the label?

[A strike]

‘K, thx for that, but,
Regardless of your evaluation of VARES reporting/reports, even given 50% error, I can’t conceivably understand how you could discount what seems to be overwhelming evidence of mortality v. all other previous vaccines combined?

As to it being self reported, word is that that has led to VERY significant under reporting. It’s not as if families are being advised to do so, and in my opinion, there is strong pressure against it in the community.

[metmom]

Which can result in allergic reactions to medications when bought from one manufacturer but not another, which is the reason I learned this from him.

[jonrick46]

This was also found in the microscopic analysis of the four samples of the vaccines:

[jonrick46]

One should look at the government actions during the smallpox epidemic. They had anti-vaxxers during that epidemic. Many died from small pox. The government did not play around. They would take you and vaccinate you by force, spray down the inside of your house with disinfectant and force you into a quarantine. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a vaccine mandate.

[Fury]

Re: 28 - you don’t disappoint. Thanks for the thoughtful comment!

[Fury]

Re: 52 - A reasonable comment. Don’t expect it to register with several posters on this thread that are pushing a narrative, and that use the deaths of people as props to further advance that narrative.