Yes I find your response reasonable, though, “not statistically different.” I don’t believe.
“...it is not unrealistic that a complication of vaccination may be DVT/PE.”
Well then why in the hell should one support universal vaccination?
Also, is the VAERS death data just false?
or is it just the price for the 99.9+% survivable scamdemic?
Do you not believe the VAERS death data ???
VAERS is very difficult to ascertain what is going on. According the the VAERS database statement — it should not used as an objective tool for decision making because it is self reported. Do I think there is some nonsense being reported? I do think there is. But I am also not blind to the actual results of the vaccination. I can tell you I have not seen a critically ill vaccination complication. I think there are a lot of minor to moderate complications that are being reported, but are self limited. I can attest to the fact that I have see an awful lot off long COVID symptoms, but not long vaccination injuries. I keep my eye out for it as I am always looking to refine my knowledge.
To be clear, I think there are risks to the vaccination. But I think there is a population where the benefit justify the risk. I do not think this is actually 99.9% survival, (until omicron emerged which I think is a pandemic ender. I point out that in the past there have been reasonable well forecasted next variants on the horizon — currently there are none) I think her his a far worse survival rate (98% or so). But, I think it is also preventable and the survival cohort is clearly, younger and healthier. So there is not a need to vaccinate the long and healthy. I believe that actually targeting the vulnerable is the best use of science, and makes the most sense.
This is something that is lost on the medical bureaucracy.