Ron Paul: What A Disappointment To Find Out What Hershey Is Doing [Re: Mandates]

twitter ^ | Feb 2 | Ron Paul

[RandFan]

What A Disappointment To Find Out What Hershey Is Doing

Clip...

[ALASKA]

Cadbury makes some good chocolate. About the same price. We absolutely have to play by their rules. If they lean left, quit 'em. If they are going to partisban, so should we.

[Kalamata]

Man, I hear ya. It is such a shame when an outstanding company loses quality and quality control. I wonder if they produce their bars in Mexico. I wonder if they use a lesser grade sugar.

OK, enough of this chocolate talk. Back to reading about quercetin and HCQ ionophores. : )

[Theophilus]

To hell with Hershey.

[JerseyDvl]

I like the M&Ms chocolate better than Hershey’s.
Though their recent woke advertisement changes do not impress me at all.

[VF-51vnv]

Try the following...........Russell Stover treats...sugar free. When you get the sugar urge,just eat one. Many choices to choose from including dark choc. Type 2 Diabetic here.

[FoundinTexas]

Called them yesterdsy. No more Hershey Kisses, Almond Bars or Reese’s Pieces.

[FoundinTexas]

Coca-Cola made in Mexico with real sugar is far superior to USA coke.

[Carriage Hill]

You mean they’re not producing them, or you’re not buying any more? If I could, I’d take yours, but as a diabetic, that’s a no-no.

[Mr. K]

I’ve had a Mexican Cola. It was good, but if I did not know I would not have been able to tell a difference.

Except for the price.

But then they could just CALL it Mexican, and charge a dollar more.

[cowboyusa]

Hersheypark used to be great with very 7noque rides. They have turned it into another Great Adventure. It stinks.

[Kalamata]

Oh yeah, now that you mention it, I do remember that. Maybe they *are* using better sugar in the Hershey bars!

[Old Yeller]

I can take the 60% dark, but my wife buys the 72% and more. Can’t eat it. Way too bitter.

Black and bitter. Just like most female federal employees.

[BipolarBob]

Thank you. I will check them out.

[flamberge]

doesn't that lend the possibility that Hershey (et Al) could be held liable for death and injury sustained by employees...

If we still operated under a rule-of-law that would indeed be a possibility.

But rule-of-law has been abandoned for quite some time now. We have pretense-of-law instead.

I do not expect any major corporation will ever be held liable in a court of law for deaths or injuries caused by the mRNA treatments which they "mandated" as a condition of employment.

There aren't enough assets in the entire national economy to pay for the actual damages caused by the "mandates". So, damages won't be paid. Cases will be postponed or appealed for decades until the original plaintiffs have died from old age. Cases will be dismissed because the plaintiffs "have no standing". Laws will be changed to make the corporations exempt from liabilities and those exemptions will be retroactive.

There may be vengeance (not justice) served up by the surviving family and relatives of the victims to a few unfortunate executives or managers. It will change outcomes only in a minor way.

My guess is that "mandates" will be quietly abandoned in the face of labor shortages, inflation, supply-chain interruptions, and war.

[KC_Lion]

Thank You.

So disappointing, but this was never about the virus or your health.