Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection
dailyexpose.uk ^ | JANUARY 15, 2022 | RHODA WILSON

Posted on 01/15/2022 9:24:56 AM PST by ransomnote

ransomnote: Paypal is trying to choke off donations going to fund the reporting at DailyExpose.uk (over the target). Prayers up that the DailyExpose will continue to survive Paypal's effort at censorship.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris.  The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) now admits the PCR test cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness.

A PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive, non-infectious, viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.

Furthermore, a PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explained this as shown in the video below.

ransomnote: video available on DailyExpose webpage or on YOUTUBE. 


Activist Post: PCR is a Process, Not a Test Says PCR Inventor Kary Mullis, 3 October 2020 (26 mins)

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it, with write-up and links, on Activist Post HERE.

Almost universally, health authorities have instructed labs to use excessively high cycle thresholds (“Ct”) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby ensuring a maximum of false positives.

From the start, experts noted that a Ct over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the CDC recommended running PCR tests at a Ct of 40,5; the University of Queensland in Australia said that laboratory technicians were running PCR tests at 40 to 50 Ct; and the World Health Organization recommended a Ct of 45.

The pandemic of false positives was then used by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures that have destroyed the global economy, ruined countless lives, decimated the education of an entire generation and stripped us of basic human rights and freedoms.

In a 30 December 2021 appearance on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions about the updated CDC guidance. CDC director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a 29 December 2021 ABC News interview.

ransomnote: video available on DailyExpose webpage or on YOUTUBE.


MSNBC: Covid Tests Don’t Do What You Think They Do, Dr. Fauci Explains, 30 December 2021 (8 mins)

Fauci was asked about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register positive for 12 weeks after an infection, it can’t be a reliable indicator of infectiousness. This was precisely the point that Mullis attempted to make in the video above with respect to PCR and HIV.

So, how can we tell if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can only tell you there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether it’s an active infection, or whether you’re actually infectious. He did not, however, provide an answer to the question as to how one can measure contagiousness.

How is it that the CDC, and health officials in all countries for that matter, didn’t realise that the PCR test was picking up dead viral debris for three months, or longer, after infection? The facts that the test, a) was far too sensitive, and b) couldn’t identify active infection, were criticisms from the start. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the past two years, people have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — perhaps weeks — waiting for a negative test.

Sources and resources:


 


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: covid; fauci; pcr; test; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2022 9:24:56 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


2 posted on 01/15/2022 9:25:17 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Better order up another 500 million kits then. Oh, and while you’re busy wasting our tax dollars, may as well pony up for a buhzillion N95 masks too.


3 posted on 01/15/2022 9:28:13 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thx


4 posted on 01/15/2022 9:29:53 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

FauXi belongs in GITMO, waterboarded,
and then in a cage with the families of
his DEAD VICTIMS (humans only; poor dogs later).


5 posted on 01/15/2022 9:31:51 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Isn’t it time for the Fake Doctors on this site that have berated people like my for posting this exact same thing to chime in and tell us we are crazy and that the PCR test is a fabulous tool??


6 posted on 01/15/2022 9:39:08 AM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

BTTT!!!


7 posted on 01/15/2022 9:43:09 AM PST by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

...Isn’t it time for the Fake Doctors on this site that have berated people like me
for posting this exact same thing, to chime in and tell us we are crazy and that
the PCR test is a fabulous tool??...

~~~~~~~

The only reason for them to do that is to rub it in, by telling us how their mission
is already accomplished.

~Easy


8 posted on 01/15/2022 9:48:23 AM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see.#KAG )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Not surprised that this article with multiple links is from the UK. The powers that be in the USA are too invested in retaining their draconian emergency powers to allow publication of such important information. We here on Freerepublic have known that the PCR test was yielding far too many false positives practically from the start of the pandemic.


9 posted on 01/15/2022 9:49:07 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

It should be renamed to the Ventilator test. If positive you go on to the only US treatment.


10 posted on 01/15/2022 9:52:54 AM PST by cp124 (Living under medical tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Per N95 mask instructions you can have facial hair. Under emergency orders we hear by ban facial hair. The shaving mandate will be checked prior to doing anything.


11 posted on 01/15/2022 9:56:53 AM PST by cp124 (Living under medical tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cp124

Cannot have facial hair.


12 posted on 01/15/2022 9:57:27 AM PST by cp124 (Living under medical tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

And spend another $1,000,000.00 per school and then close them down.


13 posted on 01/15/2022 10:01:54 AM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cp124

There is always facial hair. Some may be hiding but it’s there. So now they need to define the amount that is acceptable or unacceptable and the coverage area. I mean if they’re gonna play the game, let’s play.


14 posted on 01/15/2022 10:02:14 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

After the first Trump CoVid press Conference. The MSM were screaming for testing.It was all a Fauci scam with Pelosi and the Clintons.


15 posted on 01/15/2022 10:36:31 AM PST by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cnsmom

I’ll just put this here.

I’m wondering if the tests and masks are one giant grift.

https://www.wweek.com/news/2022/01/11/covid-testing-company-with-three-sites-in-portland-area-is-under-investigation-by-the-oregon-department-of-justice/

One chronicled a woman’s suspicions after she took her test at one of their sites. It read in part: “After swabbing myself and turning in the PCR test baggy, I saw that the Rapid tests expired in June of 2021, 3 months prior to my testing date. The haphazard workers there did not collect the used items after self-swabbing, so I still have the packaging and expired rapid test stick.”

She wrote that she received her result within a couple of hours and was suspicious about how workers were handling the tests: “This group just dropped the PCR test ziplocks into a cheap blue plastic bin on the ground. They also didn’t treat the used quick test items like medical waste. The younger worker who seemed clueless was told to write down on a blank sheet of paper what each persons’s name is, what their rapid test result was, and to tell us that we would hear from them via email. The same blue bin was there for hours, yet my PCR lab test results were back to me via email in just a couple of hours.”

She wrote that she returned to the site, asked for them to look through the blue bin because she had dropped her ring in it to prove it was the same bin with her test in it. The worker said the bin hadn’t been replaced. “How could they have both kept the same bin full of PCR samples there AND sent the samples to a lab AND had results of PCR testing to me in less than 3 hours?” she wrote.

In Brazos County, Texas, a television station reported on Monday that the company had not reported test results to the health district. In Florida, Wink News did an investigation on CCC’s sites after hearing from people that they were getting emailed test results before they even took their tests. When the news outlet visited the site, the one employee manning the desk said he had started the job four hours ago, and didn’t know who he was employed by. USA Today reported last week that complaints against the companies had been lodged to the attorney general’s offices in Oregon and Washington. The California Department of Public Health is investigating the company, too.

The company is also under investigation by the Better Business Bureau across four states.

/\


16 posted on 01/15/2022 11:03:57 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

My question is how can anyone test negative with this “virus” having been around for 2 years? Airborne…virtually impossible.


17 posted on 01/15/2022 11:40:16 AM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

well, duh! but why did he do this? because their vax push that will move from OSHA to a different agency had a test out option. Can’t have that! Make the vax the only game in town.


18 posted on 01/15/2022 11:58:57 AM PST by NonValueAdded (It seems the only immunity the vaccines provide is that big pharma can’t be sued.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Fauci says you can test positive on a PCR test for “several days” after recovery from the infection, not “12 weeks”. Does anyone bother to check the emanations from Ransomnote? you probably should because every post he makes is false or gibberish.


19 posted on 01/15/2022 2:55:31 PM PST by brookwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: brookwood

“… Does anyone bother to check the emanations from Ransomnote? you probably should because every post he makes is false or gibberish.”
****************************************************************

Well, she/he/it is on a jihad so she/he/it feels lies, distortions and misrepresentations are all permissible in her jihad. Some information she/he/it posts is good but you have to be very careful to distinguish it from the mountain of BS surrounding it.


20 posted on 01/15/2022 3:17:49 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson