Posted on 01/14/2022 8:55:57 PM PST by ransomnote
A ground-breaking scientific study has found that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 before vaccinations, experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced.
The study conducted by K. Beattie, of the University of Alberta, found that 89.84% of the 145 countries experienced a negative impact after COVID-19 vaccinations were made available.
This led to the conclusion that “The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment [..] on the total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policymakers (source).
Interestingly, it has been said that this study was made available before the U.S. Supreme Court hearing that blocked the OSHA vaccine or test mandate as the study found that in the United States, COVID-19 vaccinations account for an increased transmission rate of 38% and a 31% increase in death rate, it would have been criminal had the case not voted against the mandate rule.
The researcher of the study “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries,” said that “policymakers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19”.
Due to the vaccine rollout still being in progress a large amount of public data was available enabling analysis to be undertaken to determine whether the public policy treatment produced the desired effect. In order to do so, the researcher implemented a Bayesian causal analysis, comparing both pre-and post-treatment periods.
According to Beattie, the results indicated that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation”(source).
The study also found that it was countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, etc that had experienced few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 were the ones who appeared to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration.
“The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million,” according to the researchers.
“We can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
The researcher observed that many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 and assumed that they had appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths.
Normally, seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend but rather vaccine-induced.
Although attributing the results to the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccine protection and the amount of “breakthrough” cases, the researcher argues that together with the “overwhelming” and “historically unprecedented” quantity of reports of vaccine adverse events in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), (over 16,000 reported deaths at the time of writing) suggests a “highly untested vaccine”
The researcher also made a particularly specific warning to those who create policy and impose mandates due to the fact that their study verifies the correlation between vaccinations and a “substantial increase in death.”
Vaccine mandates were predictably criticised, Beattie states that “If they ever were ethical, which this author disagrees with strongly based on scientific, medical, and research ethics that regard the patient rights to informed consent and non-prejudcial refusal of treatment or experimentation as iterated and agreed to under the Nuremberg Code (Code 1998) and the Human Rights Declaration on Bioethics, as inalienable, essential, and non-negotiable, vaccine mandates under these conditions and results are beyond unethical at this point.”
The author has generously shared all results, data, plots, and R code included in this study for the easy replication by others.:
To access all files please refer to this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1xOphw78-BhsMly09lpxCVPZ-WGieMSqO?usp=sharing
All Causal Impact figures as compiled into multiple PDF pages can be downloaded here: https://drive.
google.com/file/d/1lX3NVqY-sbxVLM81lgK5f6I5ny9c6zGL/view?usp=sharing
Regarding using Reuters to fact check negative vax stories:
Jim Smith sits on Pfizer’s board, is also former president and current chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, and CEO and director of Reuters parent company, Thomson Reuters Corporation
https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board-of-directors/james_smith
Reuters Rooter.
So what does that make the CMS mandate if not criminal? People who worked for two years where COVID was, now getting the shaft and possibly injury or death or they can quit their job, wait to get fired and have no income.
no one ever said they would all die in 6 months. the statement was you’d see it start in 6 months.
which is about where we are now...
ADE will present itself as deaths by all sorts of different ways... which you’ll see by the overall number of deaths increasing.
what was the story last week? the leak from the indiana insurance ceo of a 40% increase in deaths within the 18-48 bracket.
Deaths due to the Covid vaccines are extremely rare and are acknowledged by the CDC.
But, every time some athletes drops dead of sudden cardiac arrest (something that has been studied and was occurring before the vaccines existed) or, even, when 99-year old Betty White died, some idiot automatically blames the death on the vaccine. It is as crazy as the left blaming a tornado or hurricane outbreak on global warming.
Benefits of the vaccines greatly outweigh the risk for those that are vulnerable to dying from Covid. Donald Trump, courageously, has said so. Younger, healthier people are probably better off not taking the risk given that they are very little risk of dying from Covid.
They are getting misinformation from the Alex Jones wing of the conservative movement.
That it is the truth is laughable. The the vast majority of studies showing that the vaccines prevent deaths and hospitalizations. And, that is precisely why Donald Trump has encouraged citizens to get the vaccines. It is wise advise if someone is a demographic that leaves them vulnerable to Covid.
We live in age where anyone can find a study that will tell them what they want to hear.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2022/01/studies-covid-vaccines-effective-limited-waning
A trio of new studies yesterday in the New England Journal of Medicine report encouraging results on the effectiveness and durability of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalization and death, including teens.
98% protection against ICU stay, life support
One study, led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) COVID-19 Response Team, involved 445 hospitalized COVID-19 patients 12 to 18 years old and 777 uninfected matched controls at 31 hospitals in 23 states from Jul 1 to Oct 25, 2021, after the emergence of the Delta (B1617.2) variant. Seventeen case patients (4%) and 282 controls (36%) had received two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Among case patients, 180 (40%) were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), and 127 (29%) needed life support. Of all ICU patients, only two were fully vaccinated. Overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90 to 96).
Among uninfected controls with COVID-like symptoms, VE was 95% (95% CI, 91 to 97), while it was 94% (95% CI, 89 to 96) among uninfected controls with no symptoms. VE was 98% against ICU admission and 98% against requiring life support. Seven patients died, and 13 required extracorporeal membrane oxygen, all of whom were unvaccinated.
Thanks for the information in both of your posts.
Humanity of bearing the brunt of our paranoia.
There are people in vulnerable demographics DYING because of Covid that might not have because they convinced not to get the vaccine by paranoid people stirred by con man like Alex Jones.
And, there are plenty studies documenting the fact the vaccines prevent hospitalizations and death. Including these very recent ones:
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2022/01/studies-covid-vaccines-effective-limited-waning 98% protection against ICU stay, life support
One study, led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) COVID-19 Response Team, involved 445 hospitalized COVID-19 patients 12 to 18 years old and 777 uninfected matched controls at 31 hospitals in 23 states from Jul 1 to Oct 25, 2021, after the emergence of the Delta (B1617.2) variant. Seventeen case patients (4%) and 282 controls (36%) had received two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Among case patients, 180 (40%) were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), and 127 (29%) needed life support. Of all ICU patients, only two were fully vaccinated. Overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90 to 96).
Among uninfected controls with COVID-like symptoms, VE was 95% (95% CI, 91 to 97), while it was 94% (95% CI, 89 to 96) among uninfected controls with no symptoms. VE was 98% against ICU admission and 98% against requiring life support. Seven patients died, and 13 required extracorporeal membrane oxygen, all of whom were unvaccinated.
You mean the wing who don’t believe the shot is working and Ivermectin is? You mean the crazy Frontline Doctor wing of the Party? Guess you prefer the Bush/Romney wing of the Party.
Bump!
I got just 12 replies on this story. I’m glad you posted it, much bigger audience.
Science is not about popularity. It is about the truth of nature.
If you can’t refute the methodology, then accept the result.
You can stop trying to put words in Ransomnote's mouth anytime, vaxtard. How she gonna say the 'virus' was man-made in a lab and then say it doesn't exist? Stop being stupid.
Here's the cliff notes version. The 'virus' does not 'exist' in the form which your lying liars that lie has explained to us poor rabble. We know better, but you don't. You suck it up and ask for more.
If you just can't follow smart people's conversations, ask for the 'Virus for Dummies' edition.
You sound more lame the more you talk.
#AndDesperate
I presented studies from the United States, where most of us live, that refute this study.
Those are bit relevant because they only include vaccines given to Americans.
And I guess we smarts will have to post it 1200 more times, along with the mountains of new evidence coming out daily exposing your fake vax. One day, you dopes may understand and put a stop to this travesty.
73% of the country has been vaxxed, like it or not. So, the issue is a political loser.
Oh, its about politics is it? That's what I thought.
Good for you…
This work like all truth stands on its own.
No, the wing the party that listens Alex Jones and believes the vaccine killed 99-year old Betty White.
No, millions aren't going to die or get AIDS because of the vaccines. I bet you think so.
Crazy does not equate to conservative.
20,000+ deaths due to the jabs have been reported to VAERS.
that’s not insignificant. normally, more then 25 deaths and they pull the shot from the market.
as for benefits... you’re just trolling now. there’s no immunity. you become a super spreader. you walk around like a ticking timebomb waiting for a clot to kill you. and as a bonus, you get to enjoy the shortened lifespan thanks to ADE.
if you’re going to say ‘follow da science’ ... then ok, let’s do that.
the jabs ALL FAILED the FDA’s animal testing which is why they had to get special waivers. How’d they fail the tests?
ALL the animals suddenly died after being re-exposed.
logic would say you should expect the same for people.
as for athletes dropping dead on the field, that’s very rare. or it use to be. Of course, these deaths they can’t hide as they happen in front of the cameras. how many more are happen that we don’t know about?
this is just from december 2021:
https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61df784eae95bf6e8f3edc68
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.