Posted on 01/14/2022 8:55:57 PM PST by ransomnote
A ground-breaking scientific study has found that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 before vaccinations, experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced.
The study conducted by K. Beattie, of the University of Alberta, found that 89.84% of the 145 countries experienced a negative impact after COVID-19 vaccinations were made available.
This led to the conclusion that “The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment [..] on the total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policymakers (source).
Interestingly, it has been said that this study was made available before the U.S. Supreme Court hearing that blocked the OSHA vaccine or test mandate as the study found that in the United States, COVID-19 vaccinations account for an increased transmission rate of 38% and a 31% increase in death rate, it would have been criminal had the case not voted against the mandate rule.
The researcher of the study “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries,” said that “policymakers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19”.
Due to the vaccine rollout still being in progress a large amount of public data was available enabling analysis to be undertaken to determine whether the public policy treatment produced the desired effect. In order to do so, the researcher implemented a Bayesian causal analysis, comparing both pre-and post-treatment periods.
According to Beattie, the results indicated that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation”(source).
The study also found that it was countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, etc that had experienced few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 were the ones who appeared to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration.
“The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million,” according to the researchers.
“We can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
The researcher observed that many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 and assumed that they had appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths.
Normally, seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend but rather vaccine-induced.
Although attributing the results to the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccine protection and the amount of “breakthrough” cases, the researcher argues that together with the “overwhelming” and “historically unprecedented” quantity of reports of vaccine adverse events in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), (over 16,000 reported deaths at the time of writing) suggests a “highly untested vaccine”
The researcher also made a particularly specific warning to those who create policy and impose mandates due to the fact that their study verifies the correlation between vaccinations and a “substantial increase in death.”
Vaccine mandates were predictably criticised, Beattie states that “If they ever were ethical, which this author disagrees with strongly based on scientific, medical, and research ethics that regard the patient rights to informed consent and non-prejudcial refusal of treatment or experimentation as iterated and agreed to under the Nuremberg Code (Code 1998) and the Human Rights Declaration on Bioethics, as inalienable, essential, and non-negotiable, vaccine mandates under these conditions and results are beyond unethical at this point.”
The author has generously shared all results, data, plots, and R code included in this study for the easy replication by others.:
To access all files please refer to this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1xOphw78-BhsMly09lpxCVPZ-WGieMSqO?usp=sharing
All Causal Impact figures as compiled into multiple PDF pages can be downloaded here: https://drive.
google.com/file/d/1lX3NVqY-sbxVLM81lgK5f6I5ny9c6zGL/view?usp=sharing
#pureblood
Didn’t some German political movement try that idea last century?
I literally find it more productive to post more content for people to review, than to post to you when you’re just shilling.
Sometimes I see trash you post worth responding to because I’ve meant to clarify some point or other, so I use your post to get my point across. But seriously, you’re not all that important.
” After years of them trying to frame Trump with one crime after another, Reuters has truly won your respect and loyalty.”
Give it up. Trump is pro-vaccine. We’ve already seen the vax kooks turn on him.
You, madam, are shilling for the grifters at The Daily Expose.
If you consider all the many hours you waste pushing preposterous conspiracy theories, one after the other, “worthwhile” then happy go with you. “One man’s trash is another’s treasure.” I don’t treasure The Daily Expose, so you are welcome to it :)
This isn’t the Q playpen where stupidity is protected. It’s a free fire zone for idiocy.
Now let’s get an answer from you about your belief that the covid virus doesn’t exist.
I bet that the majority of your doting fans have no idea that that idea is at the root of the grand conspiracy theory that you push. They missed the screed where you spelled it out. I didn’t.
You no longer mention it because it dawned on you that it’s too crazy even for your followers and they will begin to question your sanity and what you post. But you also won’t repudiate it. Why is that?
What are you blabbering about, Mr. Waste-of-time? You demand obedience from me, do you? Good - wait right here for me to obey you, and to pass the time I recommend you hold your breath.
“What are you blabbering about, Mr. Waste-of-time? “
Your belief that the Covid virus does not exist. You know exactly what I’m asking and why.
“You demand obedience from me, do you?”
I’m just asking the same question that I’ve done before. And you never get around to answering. Nor do you say:
“You are mistaken, I ransomnote do believe that the Covid virus exists. Every rational and sane person knows that”
Why is it that you won’t say if you believe that the Covid virus does or doesn’t exist? You used to say that there is no virus. That the medical world is lying to us about it. And that all of the disease is coming from the “vaccines”.
That is still your belief, isn’t it? But you’re now scared to admit it because your followers don’t know that. And if they find out some will start thinking you’re crazy.
Those numbers are all over the map, and don’t trust the govt, pro-Biden percentages as that’s Dem and RINO territory.
Reuters is trash and cancels opposing voices and data. Don’t bring that in here.
False Equivalence.
*Godwin’s Law, commie.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled New Study Shows an Increase In Deaths In 145 Countries After COVID Vaccines Were Introduced., Pelham wrote: |
“What are you blabbering about, Mr. Waste-of-time? “ Your belief that the Covid virus does not exist. You know exactly what I’m asking and why. “You demand obedience from me, do you?” I’m just asking the same question that I’ve done before. And you never get around to answering. Nor do you say: “You are mistaken, I ransomnote do believe that the Covid virus exists. Every rational and sane person knows that” Why is it that you won’t say if you believe that the Covid virus does or doesn’t exist? You used to say that there is no virus. That the medical world is lying to us about it. And that all of the disease is coming from the “vaccines”. That is still your belief, isn’t it? But you’re now scared to admit it because your followers don’t know that. And if they find out some will start thinking you’re crazy. |
*
Maybe a psychologist could help you come to terms with the fact that I posted a thread titled: New Study Shows an Increase In Deaths In 145 Countries After COVID Vaccines Were Introduced and then you showed up and tried to derail the thread by demanding I write about whatever it is you order me to write about.
You're dull as dishwater but demand my constant attention and invite me to worry about whether you think I'm scared of what you think of me.
You're enticing FReepers into harms way -try to imagine my opinion of you, then lower it by 500%. I don't care what you think and I don't take orders from you. This thread is about the death and destruction that the Covid vaccines are causing. Deal with it.
Sure, Reuters leans globo-lefty on political matters. So do nearly *all* news outlets.
It sounds like you’re the one who wants to cancel opposing voices and data. If you only want the sensational tripe shoveled by the grifters at The Daily Expose, and close your eyes to opposing data presented by qualified scientists in the field, you don’t have to read it. You are free to stick to that laughable unpublished “study” by an unqualified political science student touted by the Expose rag instead, and not question it. The rest of us are free to question if we please.
You don’t own FR. JimRob does. And nobody appointed you Gestapo over the rest of us. I will post links to whatever I please from sources allowed by him here. If you think Reuters should be banished from FR, complain to JimRob about it.
Wrong. There has been excellent reportimg from the Wall Street Journal, Washington Tines, New York Post and many other voices that have countered the proo-Biden, authoritarian, cancelling voices yet you play pigeon-hole games and act as if its only grifters who counter the garbage from Reuters you peddle here.
Yet you go with the a source from the left and have the gall to insinuate that I want what they in fact do, which is cancel people.
And when did I put all my eggs in ine basket with the Expose, genius? Never.
Time for you to wake up and grow up because you are the one also using leftist tactics and while FR allows dissent, yout use of leftist tactics ino doubt isn’t welcime here and I don’t have to own it to know that, and never would I tell Jim how to run it, yet you bring him up tp hide behind him, try to make yourself look righteous while you falsely accuse me of doing things I’m not and engage in put downs.
And I never said you to be banned, so now you flip out, get triggered, infer I am gestapoish, which is a common put down against those on the right from those on the left, so you’re doing a great job of exposing whom you are and what you’re about, and we can see whom you are in bed with politically on this.
Here’s what I told Catherd. And one can quote Reuters without trusting that leftist rag, which it seems Catherd does
Wrong. There has been excellent reportimg from the Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, New York Post and many other voices that have countered the pro-Biden, authoritarian, cancelling voices yet you play pigeon-hole games and act as if its only grifters who counter the garbage from Reuters you peddle here.
Yet you go with the a source from the left and have the gall to insinuate that I want what they in fact do, which is cancel people.
And when did I put all my eggs in one basket with the Expose, genius? Never.
Time for you to wake up and grow up because you are the one also using leftist tactics and while FR allows dissent, yout use of leftist tactics no doubt isn’t welcome here and I don’t have to own it to know that, and never would I tell Jim how to run it, yet you bring him up to hide behind him, try to make yourself look righteous while you falsely accuse me of doing things I’m not, and engage in put downs.
And I never said you to be banned, so now you flip out, get triggered, infer I am gestapoish, which is a common put down against those on the right from those on the left, so you’re doing a great job of exposing whom you are and what you’re about, and we can see whom you are in bed with politically on this.
I’m fine, thank you. Apparently, you are triggered by Reuters. Again, if you want Reuters banned from FR, complain to JimRob.
It appears you are looking to start some flame war. I am not interested. Good dat, sir.
Why would I be triggered by the leftist claptrap you put your trust in?
I never said I wanted it banned.
And anyone can see in your first response to me you lashing out acting like I was was akin to the Gestapo, blowing things way out of proportion, and slinging accusations. IOW, you tried to start a flame war and now try to project that on me, another leftist tactic. You acting like a leftist isn’t a good look for you.
It’s clear you used leftist tactics looking at the diatribe you posted compared to what I said, and you ought to be ashaned you act like a leftist.
That’s enough. Go sleep it off.
i’m stunned a freeper could really be that thick
this isn’t an isolated event or a one time occurrence.
this is just getting started. ADE hasn’t even kicked in yet. some doctors and researchers believe ADE will kill almost everyone injected within the next 5 years.
this is a travesty on a scale we’ve not seen before. with half the worlds population vaxxed, about 3.5b people... this could get very ugly.
Good grief I was done talking as you have serious issues.
Take care!
Bye.
When "doctors and researchers" keep changing the timeline for ADE, credibility is lost. Fist it was six months, then a year, and now five years.
"Official Government Reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by Christmas"
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4007381/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.