Posted on 01/14/2022 8:55:57 PM PST by ransomnote
A ground-breaking scientific study has found that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 before vaccinations, experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced.
The study conducted by K. Beattie, of the University of Alberta, found that 89.84% of the 145 countries experienced a negative impact after COVID-19 vaccinations were made available.
This led to the conclusion that “The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment [..] on the total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policymakers (source).
Interestingly, it has been said that this study was made available before the U.S. Supreme Court hearing that blocked the OSHA vaccine or test mandate as the study found that in the United States, COVID-19 vaccinations account for an increased transmission rate of 38% and a 31% increase in death rate, it would have been criminal had the case not voted against the mandate rule.
The researcher of the study “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries,” said that “policymakers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19”.
Due to the vaccine rollout still being in progress a large amount of public data was available enabling analysis to be undertaken to determine whether the public policy treatment produced the desired effect. In order to do so, the researcher implemented a Bayesian causal analysis, comparing both pre-and post-treatment periods.
According to Beattie, the results indicated that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation”(source).
The study also found that it was countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, etc that had experienced few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 were the ones who appeared to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration.
“The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million,” according to the researchers.
“We can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
The researcher observed that many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 and assumed that they had appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths.
Normally, seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend but rather vaccine-induced.
Although attributing the results to the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccine protection and the amount of “breakthrough” cases, the researcher argues that together with the “overwhelming” and “historically unprecedented” quantity of reports of vaccine adverse events in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), (over 16,000 reported deaths at the time of writing) suggests a “highly untested vaccine”
The researcher also made a particularly specific warning to those who create policy and impose mandates due to the fact that their study verifies the correlation between vaccinations and a “substantial increase in death.”
Vaccine mandates were predictably criticised, Beattie states that “If they ever were ethical, which this author disagrees with strongly based on scientific, medical, and research ethics that regard the patient rights to informed consent and non-prejudcial refusal of treatment or experimentation as iterated and agreed to under the Nuremberg Code (Code 1998) and the Human Rights Declaration on Bioethics, as inalienable, essential, and non-negotiable, vaccine mandates under these conditions and results are beyond unethical at this point.”
The author has generously shared all results, data, plots, and R code included in this study for the easy replication by others.:
To access all files please refer to this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1xOphw78-BhsMly09lpxCVPZ-WGieMSqO?usp=sharing
All Causal Impact figures as compiled into multiple PDF pages can be downloaded here: https://drive.
google.com/file/d/1lX3NVqY-sbxVLM81lgK5f6I5ny9c6zGL/view?usp=sharing
PING
If you're afraid of the vaccines, don't get vaccinated. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone else's time obsessing over them.
73% of the country has been vaxxed, like it or not. So, the issue is a political loser.
I searched FR and this article had never been posted. You know you can just skip posts like those and save all your time for yourself, no need to stop and scold. In fact I think it’s the scolding that wastes time.
Looks like by the date on the article at the UK Expose it was just posted not more than a few hours ago. News to me so thank you!
This untested and unwarranted rollout may, in the end, give the likes of Hitler and Stalin a run for their money.
Political loser or not, it is now very clear, that hummanity will bear the brunt of our hubris.
I pray for everyone.
#pureblood
“Posted for the 12,000th time”.
First I’ve seen of this.
“If you’re afraid of the vaccines, don’t get vaccinated. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone else’s time obsessing over them”.
If you don’t want to see the truth, don’t read these threads.
“73% of the country has been vaxxed, like it or not. So, the issue is a political loser”.
That’s not how those who have had adverse/harmful/long term damage and the families of those who have died look at it.
Some people want as much information on the shot as is possible. Quit being like Facebook.
👍
I think someone “protests too much”.
This “study” by a political science student is, frankly, junk. He started out with erroneous assumptions and, as always happens when one does that, ends up with even more erroneous conclusions.
You and your fellow travellers will believe it anyway. Fine and happy go with you.
For those of a more rational and scientific bent, who are not afraid to look at the critique of this unpublished study, here is one:
Ah, yes...Reuters. After years of them trying to frame Trump with one crime after another, Reuters has truly won your respect and loyalty.
The name Reuters reminds of sewer cleaning for some reason.
I don’t know if it’s because it seems like an abbreviation of Roto-Rooter or what.
It is so hard to trust ANY MSM source. They peddle so much that isn’t honest.
Anybody that thinks abortion is moral high ground, is not to be trusted to give truthful assessments of just about any subject.
Of course it is. Everything going against Fauci and the CDC is junk to vaxxers.
Strawman. Try again. And try not make it your usual ad hominem. It’s become beyond boring.
Can you explain why the Reuters piece is wrong? Of course you can’t.
Trump has been encouraging people to get vaccinated. You believe the vaccines are an evil plot to slaughter people. You must therefore consider Trump either evil or stupid.
Me, I have never encouraged anyone to get vaccinated.
So strange, how your nails mind works.
Hunh. Is that you, Kyle Beattie?
Overall, I have very low confidence in the results of this analysis,” said Elizabeth Williamson, an associate professor in the Department of Medical Statistics at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine – adding that the paper took “a very naive approach to an incredibly complex question without discussing the plausibility of the very strong assumptions being made.”
I’m not a vaxxer. I have not been vaccinated myself. I am recovering (quite nicely) from Omicron at the moment.
Fauci has lied and lied to us. He’s performed ludicrous gyrations in attempts to cover his backside.
Just because Fauci and the government cannot be believed or trusted does not make me willing to abandon my reason and believe the hokum put out by the Daily Expose and other grifter conspiracy sites.
If you want to believe it, be my guest. It’s a free country.
I still have better things to do that post to you...
Are you still in Jr High, dear?
Do you still claim that there is no Covid virus?
You didn’t used to be shy about claiming that. What changed?
This crap is confusing as hell. Requiring the vax is is evil. (Crazy the my ipad made typing the “the vax is evil” difficult with crazy autocorrects no joke ). Do we really think we are not be leading like sheep to the slaughter? I’m not sure if the nay or yay are the slaughter. Time Will tell.
Anyone have a good/true thoughts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.