| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 12/23/21 Vol.386, Q Day 1518 , Cletus.D.Yokel wrote: |
Which is it that causes the severe physical symptoms; the spikes or the RNA-capsulid? Why is the vaxx developed to make you immune to the spikes if they don’t make you sick? |
Click to skip to the bottom of this long post.
Initially, research that looked standard but was of uncertain origin (black hats, white hats?) claimed that the nucleocapsid was what was causing the real harm. Some snarled at the CDC, "and then you put the SAME THING in the 'vaccines'" to which FAUCI replied "No we didn't! No we didn't!". A few months later, Dr. Flemming said antigens to the nucleocapside were found in the blood of the vaccinated, causing him to ask, "Well if the toxic nucleocapsid is not in the vaccine, then how are the vaccinated developing antigens to it post vaccination?"
It looked like a smoking gun situation.
But then it was discovered that the pharmas had zero reason, zero proof to say that the injected 'vax' contents would stay in the site of injection (arm) and cease to function after a few days (the mRNA, not the arm, although an argument can be made for the latter).
But then Japan refused to accept a contract with one of the pharmas unless they ran bioaccumulation studies, which would be standard,normal, expected and fast, but were never done. Those studies indicated the mRNA was traveling throughout the body and collecting in ovaries, liver, testes, heart etc. (organs and tissues everywhere). One white hat researcher said the pharmas simply choose to be believe the mRNA wouldn't travel, without any reason for their belief.
Side note: People talked about needle aspiration and there were anecdotes in which nurses said, "We don't do that anymore" or agreed to aspirate the needle and then didn't do so. This was supposed to happen to avoid injecting mRNA directly into a vein, pumping mRNA to the heart and lungs etc.
Anyway, the problem is mRNA is delivered to the cells in the vital organs. So, heart muscle is invaded with mRNA which tells the cells to produce the spike. If the cells in your heart produce the spike, the spike is 'expressed' (e.g., extruded through the cell wall but still attached to it) on the tissues of vital organs. Your immune system detects the spikes attached to your organs, in this case heart, and attacks the cells. It's like putting a target on your back. The concept of spike proteins is wrong - they are expressed on the vital organs signalling your own immune system to attack.
This is one reason why I don't think the story of the Army's new vax having many spikes on a ball is good.
Also, if you get the natural infection, spike proteins are expressed in (mostly) appropriate places as the immune system detects the pathogen. But if you get injected with mRNA, the body experiences an unfamiliar explosion of billions/trillions of mRNA all being expressed at once, and there is no 'off' switch. Some people are allergic to the spike but their own cells will pump them out for an unknown length of time. The baseless assertion mRNA is non functional after a few days has no evidence to support it. The pharma's say whatever sells.
SO to your question, I don't know if the capsid was a distraction campaign to delay discovery of issues with the spike protein, or both are bad. I think there was misunderstanding of what was seen re the capside. I think the lacerations caused by the graphene hydroxide in the vax were being blamed on the capsid. Also some theories about anaphylaxis re the capsid.
My impression is the spikes are more dangerous in that they signal auto-immune attack. Organ failure/sepsis result. That's probably why Fauci selected Remdesivir to the THE only anti-viral - it shuts down organs and causes organ failure.
There's a (good, in my opinion) theory put forth by Dr. Ardiss that Remdesivir was in use in 2019, probably under another name (one of it's names is Veklury) and being used on patients to help create the appearnce of a medical crisis. People getting seasonal flu bad enough to require hospitalization then given a toxic protocol and the results (organ failure from remdesivir, blood clots for graphene hydroxide adjuvant) are attached to 'Covid' to create cover for Remdesivir and Covid 'vaccines' later. If I post a thread about how many blood clots there are, trolls virtually chant, "But Covid causes that too..."
From the start, physicians like Dr. McCullough were perplexed by the progress of what was called 'Covid', saying, "We've never seen a coronavirus cause blood clots before...." Physicians were unaware of toxins at work and all observations became symptoms of Covid. Fauci's controlled medical aparatus fanned propaganda publication to link Covid to blood clots supposedly caused by 'damaging spike proteins'. It all looks like legitimate research but it doesn't appear to be true. So I backed off reason research on Covid because with no isolated samples, the stories about the virus got disproportionately 'scary' and I concluded it was fake. Yes, people get sick, but try treating sick people instead of sending them home to get as sick as possible before killin' them in the hospital. Every year our vulnerable battle seasonal flu etc. - in 2019 to present, they've had to battle Fauci/FDA/CDC/Protocols at the same time and (too many) were lost to us.
Ah well, I get on the subject of Covid vaccines and start to drift.... But I personally believe the greatest reports of actual damage come from the spike proteins. May God be with anyone who gets 'vaccinated' and is allergic to the protein in the Spikes or capsid - your body continues to produce a protein system wide to which you may experience anaphlaxis. There's no way to halt spike productions which continues for an unknown length of time.
Not excited about an Army version of many spikes on a protein for reasons stated, and because there is zero need for a vaccine, unless it is to keep the indoctrinated from absolute panic, and is then only used to comfort them while they realize Omicron is a nothing burder, and is not actually injected.
These mRNA 'vaccines' have been under development since 2005 and they never have worked, and then they rolled them out to make them mandatory. Crimes against humanity.
I'm not sure what you mean here: "Why is the vaxx developed to make you immune to the spikes if they don’t make you sick?"
Let me speculate a little to see if I understand. The short answer is we're not supposed to become immune to the spikes. I THINK, but don't recall well now, so I'll be piecing together scraps.
Right now if you had a pathogenic virus detected in your blood, your immune system would signal 'intruder alert' and your DNA would crank out more antibodies as a result. Fauci/CDC lied to the public to a bizarre, criminal level and claimed none of us would have that reaction because Covid, they said, was a 'novel' virus, which means none of us had ever encountered anything like it and our immune systems simply would not react. None of us would have any immunity. This was the fake crisis they created.
I can't remember the name of the bow-tie wearing expert in eforensics/patents who proved that portions of Covid were patented years ago and that Covid never was novel. He basically specializes in exotic e-forensics and he helped create or himself created the movie Plandemic. He has advanced credentials unlike anyone else I've read about, so he's putting his name and face on statements like those. Hmmm...I think he's Dr. Martin.
SO there's proof that Covid is not novel, and therefore there never was a reason for any vaccines. The CDC/FAUCI's whole cover story justifying lockdowns was that Covid was 'novel' even though they held patents on Covid. We can be assured Dr. Martin's forensics are correct about this because look what happened. The young and or healthy didn't get it (immunity), older folks got it more (immunity compromised), many never got it (pre-existing immunity) or can't tell you if they did because they had something for a few days but assumed it was a flu (good assumption). We as a population displayed normal levels of immunity response that simply would be impossible if Covid really was a 'novel' virus.
This is key - when we didn't have an explosion world-wide of people dying without an immune fight, Fauci/CDC were exposed for lying and saying Covid was 'novel.'
More Proof the basis of lockdowns/vaccines is a lie: Dr Yeadon knew of research wherein patients who recovered from SARS 2003 were tested again with SARS 2003 in 2021. They were still immune - maintaining immunity after 17 years (so why is Fauci and Co talking about immunity not lasting, needing shots?).
Okay so the same researcher tested those who recovered from SARS1 in 2003 with Covid. Those people were immune to Covid because they had exposure to similar coronaviruses (most of us have) whether it's SARS1 or not. Our immune system doesn't require us to have an entirely new immune response to similar/different viruses. This is what has made me think that the history of flu 'vaccines' is their early research on us. They have tried to fan those flu vaxxes the same way they are fanning Covid vaxxes. It never took off before. I remember Fauci looking angry when the public simply would not panic for H1N1.
So we likely don't need annual flu vaccines. Natural immunity is better and if we've encountered similar corona viruses, there's simply no need for new 'shots' and definitely not the need for new shots for strains.
Anyway, as far as I can recall, the spikes are not supposed to make you sick but are to trigger your own immune response. That's working too well (ADE). The vaccinated immune system is so amped up to respond, with so many triggers in the body, that contact with a pathogen sends the immune response on a rampage and then the problem becomes run away inflammation. That's the known, historic problem with these vaccines which they never fixed. I believe it's true for all the vaccines employing spike proteins this way. Again - why I'm not excited about multiple spikes in the rumored Army vax.
Novavax marketing materials are not calling the 'shot' spike protiens but 'protein subunits' to avoid some of the public aversion to spike proteins in the news. But Novavax skips the mRNA or adenovector and is just an injection of pure spike protiens. *cringe*
Sorry about the drift...
What is the source of this?
-SB
This is from July 28,2021 on the Red Cross website section
This section in particular:
Q: "What is the different between COVID-19 antibodies that you develop from exposure to the virus and antibodies you develop as a reaction to the vaccine?"
A: "Antibodies that an individual produces when they’ve been exposed to the virus are slightly different from the antibodies that an individual produces when they’ve been vaccinated. When an individual has been infected with a virus, they produce antibodies to multiple regions of a virus, including the nucleocapsid protein. An individual who has received a COVID-19 vaccine will produce antibodies to the spike protein of the virus, but not the nucleocapsid protein, which will only occur in the event of a COVID-19 infection."
I also recommend someone save this to the wayback machine because... you know...
Thanks
Informative
ThankQ for the info !
So, even though the virus was created in a lab, and has a unique furin cleavage in it, it’s not a new virus?
ThanQ for that great explanation.
Honestly, I think I would be bonkers at this point if I had not found your Q threads a few years ago (feels like decades now). Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Thank you for setting it all out in order Ransom! a lot of work on your part. Will be copied to my Covid file.