Two questions:
A.) What are monkeys doing in your butt in the first place?
2.) Are they wearing masks and do they have their vax passport?
Bonus Question:
C.) Do you miss them?
Posted on 11/04/2021 8:06:42 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T CheshireTheCat]
Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection.
That is very bad.
In fact its catastrophically bad.
Vaccination is supposed to trick your immune system into thinking your body is being attacked without producing the bad outcomes that the actual disease can produce. You get the protection, but not the potential bad outcomes from infection itself.
That is the entire point of vaccination; to evade the possible bad outcomes from infection.
Since a traditional vaccine (which this is; inactivated whole virus) cannot replicate it should never produce the bad impacts from disease itself. That is, the only "dose" your body gets from an inactivated vaccine is what is in the syringe; no more, no less.
Unfortunately what this study shows is that a material number of these bad effects from infection come from vaccination as well. That's unexpected and hideous, especially some of the markers that showed up -- including most-specifically A1c.
It is of particular note that A1c did not return to baseline over 90 days post jab. In fact, it remained elevated with some formerly-healthy people now being in the "pre-diabetic" category. This cannot be understated in terms of what it means: Diabetes is arguably the most-serious morbid condition you can contract. To take a person with a healthy A1c level and turn them into a pre-diabetic by telling them to take the jab is criminally insane.
If you are healthy and thus not at any special risk from Covid-19 you'd be out of your damned mind to accept that risk with certainty by taking the shot and if you are coerced into it the proper response is to be placed right between the coercing party's eyes.
Diabetes is that serious folks.
Additional durable deterioration was found in both potassium (electrolyte balance) and creatinine, which is a kidney damage marker. I remind you that unlike your liver which can regenerate you only have two kidneys and if they fail you're ****ed.
What's particularly ugly is that if you get hammered with a so-called "breakthrough" infection later on these deteriorations, which appear to be durable, may well screw you down the road. Both are serious co-morbid factors that radically increase the risk of getting screwed if you get Covid-19.
Now to be fair this study is on a whole, inactivated vaccine. It therefore may -- or may not -- generalize to the mRNA jabs.
We do not know.
But don't you think we should know?
Indeed since the jabs used in the US (and Europe) all "program" the body to produce the spike protein, and we know the spike is pathogenic, it is entirely reasonable to believe that these impacts not only exist with mRNA and viral vector jabs they may in fact be materially worse than those from whole, inactivated virus.
More to the point shouldn't we have run this sort of testing and thus known, by published studies, before we jabbed 200 million Americans and threatened the rest?
If this sort of durable damage does happen how often does it happen and how-severe is it?
Folks, the change in immune markers along with creatine and A1c is flat-out nasty. Let me quote from the study itself:
This is a comprehensive investigation of the pathophysiological changes, including detailed immunological alterations in people after COVID-19 vaccination. Results indicated that vaccination, in addition to stimulating the generation of neutralizing antibodies, also influenced various health indicators including those related to diabetes, renal dysfunction, cholesterol metabolism, coagulation problems, electrolyte imbalance, in a way as if the volunteers experienced an infection.
And while some of those returned to baseline over the subsequent 90 days renal dysfunction and diabetes markers DID NOT.
Together, these data suggested that after vaccination, at least by day 28, other than generation of neutralizing antibodies, people’s immune systems, including those of lymphocytes and monocytes, were perhaps in a more vulnerable state.
So to "evade" the risk of Covid-19's serious outcomes you deliberately damage the immune response for at least some period of time against all manner of other things, some of which are at least as dangerous as Covid-19 is.
Bluntly put in the period following taking the jab you appear to be at much-elevated risk from other infections. Nobody knows but that the jabs impair your immune response on at least a temporary basis for a month or two appears to be established.
Much worse some of those markers, even three months in, do not return to their former values. Specifically, electrolyte levels (potassium in particular), A1c and creatinine. The latter two, markers for diabetes and kidney damage are extraordinarily serious. That they do not return to normal within 90 days implies the damage vaccination causes may well be permanent.
Our study postulates that it is imperative to consider the potential long-term impact of vaccination to certain medical conditions34 or to general human health.
No kidding?
Especially for an infection that is (1) not certain and (2) if you do get it, and beat it, you may not get these ugly outcomes.
I do not know about my creatinine level being changed due to infection -- said infection definitely did happen, but without data on both sides of the event I cannot discern if there was an impact or not. I know short-term electrolyte level disruption occurred because of the symptoms I experienced in the middle of the course of the disease. What I also know is that it did not damage my blood sugar profile, because I have a meter (no 'script required, just money and not having to use it all the time not much money either) having used it to check such things years ago when I decided to go keto as a lifestyle and, having in-date strips for it I did check a couple of times during the course of the disease and did not see anything notable - and a couple of random checks since showed nothing interesting either. In short I see no evidence of insulin resistance now and it has not changed from before. Its been years since I checked A1c specifically. Perhaps I shall.
But if I got jabbed against Covid-19 and it resulted in a durable elevation of my average blood sugar level such that it took my normal A1c level and turned it into a prediabetic one, given the hideous long-term consequences of diabetes, I would cut off the head of the person who did that to me and **** down their neck. Never mind elevation of the risk of renal failure, which is a very reliable and nasty way to die as well.
This needs to be run down for the mRNA and viral-vector jabs now and until it is, conclusively, this crap must be immediately halted. If you vaccinate a single child before proving these things do not happen with the jabs we use here in America you should hang for it -- by your genitals.
I become more-convinced by the day that my decision to risk natural infection, and attack it immediately with drugs, garnering natural immunity in the process, was the correct choice.
Biden can take his jabs and shove them up his ass.
PING
...and it makes monkeys fly outta yer butt!
“an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine”
None of the vaccines in the US introduce an inactivated virus, but instead stimulate the production of a modified viral protein. That approach has a different set of advantages and concerns.
From Market Ticker’s discussion of that article, a commenter writes
Typo in the title, You instead of Youre.
Theres this, too:
New research from Dr. Mike Williams shows how the mRNA jabs turn off the bodys innate immune system, specifically Toll Like Receptors (TLR) 3, 7 and 8, which play a vital role in fighting viruses, infections, and CANCER!
https://mobile.twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1454385736938033152
Fynderella has several posts about the changes to the immune system induced by the jabs.
Bryan, biopsy necessity has increased Id say about 25%, and that includes new diagnosis and remissions. Additionally, they are markedly more aggressive, advancing so quickly that they are being counted as unchecked cancers because of lockdown. Its not.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Fynnderella1/status/1454069445664677895
Two questions:
A.) What are monkeys doing in your butt in the first place?
2.) Are they wearing masks and do they have their vax passport?
Bonus Question:
C.) Do you miss them?
Q ANON get boring? Moved to new obsession?
“...and it makes monkeys fly outta yer butt!”
Video, or it didn’t happen.
is that your game. attack messenger, instead of providing a better message?
*** Diabetes is arguably the most-serious morbid condition you can contract. ***
And yet, millions of Americans eat their way into this horrible way of life with pleasure, and completely voluntarily. I know because I did that myself.
I’m very glad I took my doctor’s advice a few years ago to take my weight gain seriously. It is so easy to put on a few pounds, and so hard to take them off, but discipline and perseverance is paying off.
Here’s the study
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-021-00329-3.pdf
Like Karl states this is very bad.
Even WHO knows this.................
Q is the least boring thing there is. And it covers EVERYTHING, including this bio-attack.
#EnjoyYourCartoons
So what?
Funny gif 2.0
Covid and the Vax are meant to kill long term, not short term (8.1.21)
Insights welcome.
Artificial lighting urbanites might consider including vitamin D3 in their healthy diets in my non-medical opinion.
Our greatest weapon against the coronavirus is Vitamin D: Board-certified pathologist (3.29.21, probably no lucrative government contracts to be made from making vitamin D3 imo.)
Dr. Ryan Cole #StoptheMandate (excellent 32 minute video with transcript) (8.15.21)
Vitamin D Can Help Reduce COVID-19 Risks: Here’s How (last year, 9.13.20)
Again, insights welcome.
There is so much horribly wrong with your reasoning in this post that I can't even begin to try to help you.
Never mind that it's only 11 patients in the "study," and that's it 11 "healthy" Chinese volunteers at that. It's simply foolhardy to extend any conclusions from such a small and severely homogeneous patient population to the diverse and huge USA, or any group really.
But the biggest problem in your analysis, is that you predicate all your conclusions on the idea of an mRNA vaccine, and not a "real" vaccine--one using attenuated (weakened or inactivated or dead) virus--and you use the data in this "study" for that.
But this "study" actually uses a "real vaccine," an attenuated vaccine--the Sinopharm "Vero Cell" vaccine (it's in the freaking report, if you read it). So all of your conclusions about how bad mRNA vaccines are, drawn from this "study," are worthless.
All this "study" says is that some of those 11 healthy chinese volunteers that got the weakened virus vaccination responded just as if they had been actually infected. So maybe it just means the vaccination worked, or maybe that the weakened virus in the vaccine was less inactivated than they thought.
SMH.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.