|
Posted on 10/19/2021 1:08:47 AM PDT by ransomnote
Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
I claim that.
+1
Snoopy Says (CTH)
October 24, 2021 12:46 am
Now ask yourself what was going to happen? The Pandemic. And, it just so happens, the Pandemic came in useful for changing State Election Laws for the 2020 election.
Part 3
What your reading is the caption from the video
David E. Martin testifies at the German Corona Inquiry Committee, July 9th, 2021
Transcript
So um it’s been around quite a long time um i’m not going to belabor many more points other than to say that it was very clear that Merck knew that sorry that Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in march of 2019 and this is a very important date because in march of 2019 for reasons that are not transparent they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings which is a very bizarre behavior, but they amended a number of patent filings to specifically make reference to an intentional or accidental release i’m sorry their term deliberate release of coronavirus so in March they amended four failed patent applications to begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development, and they began dealing with a very significant problem that they had which was they relied on technology that they did not own two Canadian companies arbutus pharmaceuticals and acuitous pharmaceuticals actually own the patent on the lipid nanoparticle envelope that’s required to deliver the injection of the mrna fragment and those patents have been issued both in Canada and in the US and then around the world in their world intellectual property equivalents Moderna knew that they did not own the rights and began trying to negotiate with arbutus and acuitis to get the resolution of the lipid nanoparticle patented technology available to be put into a vaccine, and we know as i made reference to before that in November they entered into a research and cooperative research and development agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside of the lipid nanoparticle so that they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen allegedly that was running around what makes that story most problematic beyond the self-evident nature of it is that we know that from 2016 until 2019 at every one of the NSAID advisory council board meetings Anthony Fauci lamented the fact that he could not find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine which is what was his favorite target he was trying to get the population to engage in this process and what becomes very evident with peter dashick eco-health alliance UNC Chapel Hill and others and then most specifically by March 2019 in the amended patent filings of moderna we see that there is an epiphany that says what if there was an accidental or an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen and what makes that particular phrase problematic is it is exactly recited in the book a world at risk which is the scenario that was put together by the World Health Organization in September 2019, so months before there’s an alleged pathogen which says that we need to have a coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release which by September 2020
Snoopy Says (CTH)
October 24, 2021 1:03 am
No Patent, no money – right? You can not charge for a virus that came from the public domain. This is fraud, right?
Part 4
What you’re reading is the caption from the video
David E. Martin testifies at the German Corona Inquiry Committee, July 9th, 2021
Transcript
These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus but also covered the means of detecting it using rtpcr now the reason why that’s a problem is if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself, and you own the patent on its detection you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 percent of the provenance of not only the virus itself but also its detection meaning you have entire scientific and message control and this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research coronavirus the only problem with that statement is it’s a lie and the reason why it’s a lie is because the patent office not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain in other words prior to CDC’s filing for a patent the patent office found 99.9 percent identity with the already existing coronavirus recorded in the public domain and over the rejection of the patent examiner and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007 the CDC overrode the patent office’s rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS coronavirus so every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the patent office this is not something that’s subtle and to make matters worse they paid an additional fee to keep their application private last time I checked if you’re trying to make information available for the public research you would not pay a fee to keep the information private
I wish I could have made up anything i just said but all of that is available in the public patent archive record which any member of the public can review and the public pair as it’s called at the United States patent office has not only the evidence but the actual documents which i have in my possession now this is critically important it’s critically important because fact-checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel coronavirus designated as SARS cov2 is in fact distinct from the CDC patent and here’s both the genetic and the patent problem if you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003 again in 2005 and then again in 2006 what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 and 99 of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the novel subclade of SARS cov2
[W]hat we know is that the core designation of SARS coronavirus which is actually the clade of the beta coronavirus family and the subclade that has been called star cov2 have to overlap from a taxonomic point of view you cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS so the disingenuous fact-checking that has been done saying that somehow or another CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent or this particular pathogen is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences, and it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ictv taxonomy because it very clearly states that this is in fact a subclade of the clade called SARS coronavirus now what’s important is on the 28th of April and listen to the date very carefully because this date is problematic three days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus in 2003 three days later sequoia pharmaceuticals a company that was set up in Maryland sequoia pharmaceuticals on the 28th of April 2003 filed a patent on antiviral agents of treatment and control of infections by coronavirus CDC filed three days earlier and then the treatment was available three days later now just hold that thought for a second who is sequoia pharmaceuticals well there you go that’s a good question because sequoia pharmaceuticals and ultimately ab links pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary holdings of Pfizer crusell and Johnson and Johnson wow.
Testify! The Testimonies Project was created to provide a platform for all those who were affected after getting the covid-19 vaccines, and to make sure their voices are heard, since they are not heard in the Israeli media.
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
posted on 10/24/2021, 1:12:20 AM by \/\/ayne
This thread I posted really has gotten a lot of responses quickly considering it is 1am EST.
A Reason to Be Vaccinated: Freedom
Desiring God ^ | October 19, 2021 | John Piper
Posted on 10/24/2021, 1:03:32 AM by CheshireTheCat
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4006237/posts?page=25#25
Thank you
Life above the clouds. Nice
Canada scraps COVID-19 travel advisory; Ontario to end mask, vaccine rules by March
https://news.yahoo.com/canada-scraps-covid-19-advisory-134931703.html
How the 2020 Election Was Stolen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tVYkTR4wZA
In this video, I provide an overview of how the evidence indicates that the 2020 election was stolen in four phases:
1) Preparation
2) Main Attack
3) Backup Attack
4) Defense
Great post. Thanx
What about the unvaccinated flying? It didn’t mention that.
Well put. You’re on a roll
WAit till people learn what they did with cats. (FIV) FIV just came out of nowhere to make tons of profit selling vaccines to vets?
I’ve yet to form an opinion on whether or not the McAfee posts are worth paying attention to. As I mentioned, they’re just a curiosity at the moment.
However, the stakes are so high that I think it’s a dynamic situation. Game theory, at which the Q team are experts, demands that the players change their tactics in response to the actions of the other players. By definition, there can be no absolutes.
~~~~~~~~~
I still watch, listen and read looking for clues but I’ve never found anything legitimate - I still look. I don’t know if they may use McAffee as a portal but after their security efforts, I believe it’s unthinkable they would broadcast to the web they are the same ones behind Q. It’s the opposite of security and gains them nothing. An unverified sources saying ‘it’s the same people’ doesn’t authenticate McAffee.
Do you forsee a scenario where, after fighting to validate themselves throughout their drop history, asking each time ‘how many coincidences before it becomes impossible’ that Q’s game theory would obtain a strategic advantage by dropping all requirements that the next person(s) posting as Q prove they are legit?
We saw what the DS did when Q leaked their password - instant hack. Then there was that recent hack. So requiring a tripcode after authentication have been the only thing ensuring Comms were white hat.
“Game theory, at which the Q team are experts, demands that the players change their tactics in response to the actions of the other players. “
I don’t see player authentication as a tactic but instead see it as an invitation to play the game. Those not authenticated, not invited to play.
I see no strategic advantage in abandoning authentication of the one driving the Q bus. Open door = anyone can post, and the right people will be the only ones who try?
Paul Furber, who was one of the first to host Q on 4Chan and elsewhere said that Q reached out to him several time about issues of logging in, trip codes, registering cell phone #s and the like. He definitely disagrees with this Q claim.
~~~~~~~~~~~
I wish I were a Paul Furber fan. It could win me fans of my own. However, I think Paul Furber writes BDAnon and for some reason, BDA serves disinfo. Yeah, I’m a complicated woman! :D
I can see this
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
