Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/13/21 Vol.375, Q Day 1447

RESIST!

Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.

Q describes this awakening as follows:

"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.

The choice is yours, and yours alone.

Trust and put faith in yourself.

You are not alone and you are not in the minority.

Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.

WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)

The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"

Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.

Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.

In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.

** No mention whatsoever about shots. **

check this out from the same source (side-bar link)...camel’s nose is under the tent

https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2021-07-07

“This Updated Interim Enforcement Response Plan outlines inspection procedures to enable CSHOs to identify exposures to COVID-19-related hazards in non-healthcare settings, and to ensure that appropriate control measures are implemented. Worker protections in non-healthcare industries will be focused on employees who are unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated, including whether such employees are working indoors or outdoors.”

do a web page find on “vacc”
It sure seems like they set the table for the mandatory jab.

Covid related; c & p from the thread BTT

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4004268/posts?page=34

Link to us code posted separately since it doesn’t c & p:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4004268/posts?page=21#21

Here is the relevant section of US Code 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies:
(e) Conditions of authorization
(1) Unapproved product
(A) Required conditions
With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Secretary, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances described in subsection (b)(1), shall, for a person who carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued, establish such conditions on an authorization under this section as the Secretary finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health, including the following:
(i)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that health care professionals administering the product are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the alternatives to the product that are available, and of their benefits and risks.
(ii)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
(iii) Appropriate conditions for the monitoring and reporting of adverse events associated with the emergency use of the product.
(iv)cFor manufacturers of the product, appropriate conditions concerning recordkeeping and reporting, including records access by the Secretary, with respect to the emergency use of the product.
Note that this section is for Emergency Use Authorization (for the currently available vaccines) and includes informed consent and the option to refuse.
I underlined the part about “consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product” because I believe this pertains to the medical “consequences” of not taking the drug. It does NOT give permission to businesses to place “consequences” on employees who don’t take the drug. The former gives the recipient the choice, the latter is coercive consent under duress.

Nobody can give a legally binding consent under these conditions, and for that reason these mandates to take the EUA vaccines should be challenged in court.

-PJ

21 posted on 10/16/2021, 7:18:21 PM by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

And I asked if a lawsuit had been brought using that section; answer (link doesn’t c & p, so posted separately):

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4004004/posts

Yesterday.

Military, Federal Employees and Civilian Contractors Sue Biden.

-PJ

34 posted on 10/16/2021, 7:52:39 PM by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

stylin19a wrote:

“
** No mention whatsoever about shots. **

check this out from the same source (side-bar link)...camel’s nose is under the tent

https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2021-07-07

do a web page find on “vacc”
It sure seems like they set the table for the mandatory jab.
“

ThankQ for finding that!

Ok this is addressing non healthcare settings, and they are -not- saying anything about testing or PPE, only shots.

“
Inspection procedures

identify exposures to C19 hazards

ensure appropriate control measures are implemented

Worker protections

focused on employees who are unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated, including whether such employees are working indoors or outdoors.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

RESIST!

Where We Go 1, We Go All