Posted on 09/08/2021 7:41:13 PM PDT by Alter Kaker
EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The effects of Ivermectin therapy on human males can have an effect on men’s reproductive health.
Researchers at three universities in Nigeria studied the effects of Ivermectin, which is used to treat river blindness and other medical conditions in humans, on men’s sperm counts. According to their study, 85 percent of men who take Ivermectin become sterilized.
Ivermectin is often used as an anthelmintic to combat parasites in animals and some people have been using it to fight COVID-19 despite health experts’ recommendations against it.
(Excerpt) Read more at ktsm.com ...
“ Even these weasel-word spewing freaks couldn’t swallow this one
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ivermectin-sterility-in-men/”
———————————————————————————————-
Hang on there………
You mean to tell me whenever someone uses Snopes for some Anti-Vaccine story (like the vaccines killed 75,000 in one day)……….that’s wrong and shouldn’t be taken seriously because Snopes is a Liberal piece of crap.
But, but, but……..NOW……..Snopes is ok. No objections.
Got it.
LOL...the lying, n00b, shift working vax-troll shill had to pop in with it’s poo posts, to earn its pieces of silver, today.
I think this IS his day job 😂
Jack Posobiec just referred to Biden as a ‘vaxhole’...much better that vax-troll, IMHO. :-)
“ Hell, if this were true, Planned Parenthood and ZPG would have been hawking it for decades.”
I disagree
If ivermectin truly caused sterility in men, Planned Parenthood would fight it tooth and nail. You can’t harvest parts from aborted babies if they are never conceived in the first place. That would crush their bottom line
sorry charlie you don't get it...you got nothing but your head where you can't see. kill the message not the messenger..
“If ivermectin truly caused sterility in men, Planned Parenthood would fight it tooth and nail. “
Very good point.
It doesn’t matter what’s in my head or if anyone is pro or anti this or that.
Im pointing out that when the shoe is on the other foot, when the same web-sites, or “facts” are used by the opposing side (whichever side that may be) the same standards should apply.
If the same standards don’t apply, then that’s hypocritical.
Don’t get vaccinated, or get vaccinated all according to your needs or decision.
But equal standards, equal treatment should and could be maintained.
thats next !
you are pointing out kill the messenger when it suits your agenda...instead of the message your circular reasoning must make you dizzy.
😂😂😂
You’re not much for detecting the sarcasm or irony of something, are you?
The Denseness is strong with that one.
Dr. Zelenko with the ‘spice’ .... and the truth:
@DrZevZelenko [via GETTR account]
·
The Zelenko Protocol was developed by me using hydroxychloroquine. I subsequently added the use of ivermectin when it was shown to work.
The devolved pagans have done everything possible to suppress access to these medication and have provided false fear mongering to the sheepish public.
The newest garbage on ivermectin is that a medication used billions of times is being blamed for reduction of sperm count in patients with river blindness from a Nigerian study from 2011.
Oh really, perhaps it is the parasitic disease that damage the scrotum of affected patients.
https://sti.bmj.com/content/80/1/12
Stop being sheep.
Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD
P.S. You could have come with something more credible than a 10 year old study from Nigeria. I expect better.
Definitely.
BTTT!!
👍🏼👍🏼
How is it then that Sub-Saharan Africa has SO MANY PEOPLE their land can't support them? What about INDIA?
I HATE these lying propagandists trying to protect their "vaccine" revenue stream by lying about Ivermectin. The man who discovered that got a NOBEL PRIZE.
I’m pointing out this:
When the story came out that the Hospitals were swamped with people that overdosed on Ivermectin……I never commented, I smell something was wrong with that. Then when it was reported to be a totally fake story, I didnt need to backtrack, cover myself, or make excuses.
My credibility didn’t take a hit on that.
When a story comes out that 45,000 people died in the U.S. from the vaccines in one month, (one of many huge amount of death claims) everyone that is anti-Covid- vaccine jumps on it like flies on crap.
Of course it turned out to be another fake story/claim.
Both brought to us by Twitter, just an added thought there.
But those people don’t seem to understand why their credibility takes a hit.
Instead, they get furious if someone challenges them on it.
This thread, the article makes negative claims about Ivermectin.
I believe the story is false. I think the study was botched and it wasn’t even performed under ideal circumstances.
But, here in the the thread, the anti-Covid-vaccine people sound exactly like the pro-vaccine people did when a claim was made that 45,000 dropped dead in one month.
The difference and there really is just one major difference, one of the “sides” become angry when opposed no matter what side they’re on.
When defending a fake story/claim they’re angry.
When attacking a story or claim they’re angry and cruel.
Even calling people murderers.
Why is that do you suppose?
Sometimes the message is wrong, sometimes the messenger is also wrong in their comments or editorial. Sometimes both are wrong.
Perhaps it doesn’t matter.
But, thank you for a calm demeanor and polite conversation.
Yes, I’m dizzy from vaccine threads.
Except for today, I’m commenting less and less about them.
Seems to cure dizziness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.