Posted on 09/05/2021 7:20:53 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Cathi]
The UK Government have released their thirty-first report highlighting adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections that have occurred since the roll-out began on the 8th December 2020, and it proves younger adults and children are suffering severe adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections.
The U.K. Governments report (which you can find here) has collated data inputted up to the 25th August via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. Our earliest analysis of the data which we brought you back at the beginning of February showed that there had been 49,472 adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine, and 21,032 adverse reactions to the Oxford vaccine up to the 24th January 2021, with a rate of 1 in every 333 people receiving the jab suffering a serious adverse reaction.
Since then the number of reported adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine has increased to 309,612 as of the 25th August. The AstraZeneca jab has fared much worse though, with the total number of adverse reactions now standing at 819,007. There have also been 46,244 adverse reactions to the Moderna jab of which 2.2 million doses have been administered, and 3,226 adverse reactions reported where the brand of vaccine was not specified.
According to the MHRA the current rate of people suffering a serious adverse reaction after having one of the experimental Covid vaccines stands at 1 in every 142 people, with 1,178,089 adverse reactions having now been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.
However, as of the 25th August 47.8 million people had allegedly received at least one dose of a Covid-19 injection in the UK, therefore an adverse reaction has been suffered for every 40 people who have been vaccinated.
But it’s important to remember that this rate only accounts for the adverse reactions that are actually reported, which is estimated to be around only 10% by the MHRA themselves, meaning the actual rate of adverse reactions occurring is frighteningly higher.
We took a look at the reported adverse reactions and this is what we found…
(We used the data shown in the UK Governments Analysis Print of the Pfizer vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Oxford Vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Moderna Vaccine {which you can find here}.)
MUCH MORE AT LINK
In before the Branch Covidians.
Hhmmm...never heard of that...
Also from this same Blog………..
The same Blog wants us to believe that the U.K.’s equivalent to the CDC, the NIH ordered medical personnel to murder people and of course everyone fell right in lock step.
But only this Blog has the Blockbuster story.
The madness continues………..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are eager to thoroughly distort this article, aren't you? It's not a blog - there's a link on the page to their blog but. It's not about other articles you link.
The article in the OP links to the office government sources in the last paragraph of my post.
(We used the data shown in the UK Governments Analysis Print of the Pfizer vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Oxford Vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Moderna Vaccine {which you can find here}.)
In before the Branch Covidians.
No Ransomnote, I’m not eager to distort the article.
I was eager to gain information until I saw what the source really was then I was disappointed.
Continued madness with these sources, links, blogs, Twitter, BitChute can no longer be explained away or downplayed by calling people who object or know better shills, trolls, or Fauci advocates.
Sorry to see this actually.
I don’t think it’s a “Rabbit Hole” people are deep into anymore…….it’s a prison, a cell.
Good day, Madam.
All this adds to the weight of data that adds doubt to counter vaccine mandates and vaxxports, which are the real demonic end game here.
But if you present this or VAERS to New Normals, they will discount it as over-reported and not individually analyzed.
Is there any such report??!? If not, why not?
Not that the New Normal cultists can ever be convinced anyway...
I was eager to gain information until I saw what the source really was then I was disappointed.
~~~~~~~~~
The UK government released reports the public finds shocking. The MSM, the Lancet, the CDC insist no one speak of it. Youtube and Twitter delete content soon enough. SO, alternative media picks it up and then you are ‘disappointed’. I’m disappointed in you, David.
They are the government and are therefor allowed high capacity magazines
Sensationalist headline for sure but we already know they did the same sabotaging of the trials here. They did it to veterans at a VA hospital. Gave it to them way late in the game. Gave them very high doses and did not add Zinc, Zpack, vitamin D etc. Then they said, “See, we told you it doesn’t work.” This wasn’t all that long after Trump had mentioned HCQ as possibly being a game changer.
Every “official” trial for HCQ or Ivermectin has been purposefully wrong to keep the jabs going. They do it too late and don’t add the other items like Zinc and Zpak.
The UK government should be canceled.
bttt
bkmk
Agree :-(
There's a whole section on various injection site issues, ranging from discoloration to "it hurt". Another section devoted to...flatulence.
Gives you some idea about the mindset of the people reporting these "issues".
There is some useful information contained within the UK government report. For example, I was able to glean the total numbers of two shot vaccine recipients (42M) broken out by vaccine type.
Pfizer = 41% Astra = 57% Moderna = 2%
There are also roughly 5.8M Brits who received a single dose of one of the two shot vaccines, and I’m unclear on whether they are considered fully vaccinated by the UK government.
Also discovered that the vaccine distribution protocol in the UK differs substantially from the United States in that the UK did NOT follow Pfizer’s protocols on administering the second dose of vaccine three weeks after the first one...instead stretching out the time between vaccinations to thirteen weeks.
Whenever someone brings up the UK breakthrough hospitalization rate, remember that almost 60% of UK vaccine recipients were not given an American vaccine, and those that were did not follow the standard three week protocol for treatment.
Early reported injuries among younger recipients is heartbreaking (literally). Injuries to heart tissue is permanent. Neurological injury is probably permanent as well. This includes damage to oto-neurology
I've been waiting to see if Chelsea Handler got her hearing back in the left ear, the one she lost hearing in after her 2nd dose of Moderna. I suspect that all the hearing related injuries are permanent as well. This includes related conditions like tinnitus, Miniere's disease and hyperacusis. These last three can be managed with retraining therapies and off label use of anti-anxiety meds.
Some intermediate term injures which may manifest are the reimurgence of dormant cancers according to Malone. These may be occurring in the short term, because some doctors are reporing a 10x increase in reported cancers.
If the vaccines cause chronic neurological injury, then we may see emerge "zombies" (not kidding).
Ignore the lying, n00b, vax-troll ;-)
Ignore the lying, n00b, vax-troll ;-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re right. Sometimes I forget. :/
You are correct. And every person jabbed becomes another disciple jabbers. Even some of the idiots suffering the adverse reactions to the jabs are preaching for more jabs.
The German Nazis never had it so easy. They had to herd the Jews onto the trains at gunpoint.
Today the condemned get in line willingly, and pay money, to get exterminated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.