A cat lady AND a hippie.
Great.
Posted on 09/01/2021 6:03:54 PM PDT by datura
Editor’s Commentary: For the last couple of months, readers and sources have encouraged us to cover Graphene Oxide. The toxin that is almost certainly found in the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines,” among others, may be the key to uncovering the conspiracy being perpetrated against American and the world.
I’ve held back for three reasons. First, and I’m just being frank, it’s over my head. I’m not a scientist, doctor, or even a particularly smart guy. My early research revealed to me that I needed an adult to explain it all, which brings me to the second reason I haven’t covered it. There weren’t the right “adults” talking about it. I generally lean on the expertise of people like Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny to guide me through the science surrounding the so-called “vaccines.” None of them have gone after Graphene Oxide, at least not that I have seen, so I waited.
The third reason I haven’t tackled the conspiracy is because we had not seen high-profile real-world examples of reporting on it. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not suggesting I wait around for mainstream media to report on something before I consider it legitimate. On the contrary, one of the reasons I explored it in the beginning was because mainstream media was conspicuously attempting to suppress or debunk discussion about it. What I was waiting for was the “accidental” reports of loosely related stories that mentioned the toxin. That happened over the past week, as the article from Free West Media details below.
I’ll add my commentary at the end.
Graphene Oxide Is the Main Ingredient in Covid Jabs Says Former Pfizer Employee According to a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for pharmaceutical industries, graphene oxide nanoparticles are the key ingredient in Biotech’s Covid-19 shots, the product which is being marketed as a “vaccine”. But bad news from Japan may have an impact on this marketing strategy.
In an interview with Stew Peters on July 28, Karen Kingston said graphene oxide was not listed as an ingredient, because the manufacturers claimed that it was a trade secret. It was therefore not included in Biotech’s patent filing as an ingredient in the Covid-19 shots, since it is purported to be the intellectual property of the pharmaceutical giant.
Kingston explained that while the ingredient was redacted from Pfizer’s US patent due to its alleged status as a “trade secret”, it was actually included in Pfizer’s Chinese patent application.
According to Kingston, the Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna vaccine are essentially the same injection. It is therefore interesting to note that in the July 2020 Moderna patent [US #10703789B2], lipid nanoparticles, the phospholipid, the cholesterol, the cationic (positive ionic-charged lipid) and the PEGylated polyethylene glycol lipid are also listed as was done for the Pfizer product.
The Chinese patent described the compound hydrogel, composed primarily of graphene oxide. She has no doubt that these jabs contain the ingredient that the Japanese government has now alluded to in their ban on alleged “contaminated” vials of these products. “I’m as confident that graphene oxide is in these as I am that gravity exists,” she said. She also underlined that graphene oxide was the “main ingredient in the Covid shots”.
Like India, Japan has launched the discussion of the success of Ivermectin to treat Covid-19.
There are at least 2000 studies on graphene oxide toxicity and 500 of them were published in 2017. Graphene oxide has been developed for biomedical gene and drug delivery under the EU’s “Graphene Flagship” programme.
The EU programme spent billions of euros on testing gene delivery for an intranasal SARS-Cov-2 flu vaccine containing graphene oxide. In fact, in China a patent was filed and approved last year, using graphene oxide nanotechnology in gene and drug delivery and diagnostic purposes for a “Coronavirus vaccine”.
Moderna had previously developed graphene oxide for cancer treatment since it had specialized in cancer cures, not vaccines. Moderna had been a struggling oncology cancer therapy company, before its surprising success as a “global leader” in “vaccines”.
Japan has now reported yet another “contamination case” involving Moderna’s (MRNA.O) vaccine, the fourth such incident in less than a week, suggesting that the country’s inoculation campaign is about to hit a wall. Moderna claims that it was caused as “bits of the vials’ rubber stopper break off when needles are incorrectly inserted”.
The bad news from Japan may have also pushed two leading FDA members to resign. The two top vaccine officials, Marion Gruber, director of the Office of Vaccines Research & Review, and Phil Krause, her deputy director, announced their decision on Tuesday. Gruber has been at the FDA for 32 years and Krause has worked at the agency for more than a decade.
They had been “frustrated” by the CDC’s meddling in the vaccine approval process, as well as with White House pressure to market booster vaccines, a former top FDA official told Endpoints.
After two animal trials that resulted in the death of all the animals, graphene oxide was deemed to be unfit for use in humans due to its toxicity to healthy cells as well as vaccine-induced ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) resulting in the immune system destroying itself.
Leading virologist Professor Dolores Cahill, world-renowned virologist Geert Vanden Bossche and Pfizer whistleblower, Dr. Michael Yeadon have all warned of the danger of ADE.
Animal studies had already confirmed that graphene oxide enabled “self-replicating vaccines“, i.e. transmission.
In his last interview, Julian Assange described the advances in this kind of nano-technology which graphene oxide made possible. It is a world in which computers are as small and weightless as dust particles. These mini machines, invisible to the naked eye, would be breathed in or injected. A researcher named Kristofer Pister coined the term “smart dust” in 1997, a reference to wireless microelectromechanical sensors (or MEMS).
Proponents visualize these particles as the Internet of Things on another level. Smart dust would make it possible to run a Google search in the physical world by using smart dust, but it also raises serious issues about privacy, weapons, and surveillance. Whoever controls smart dust – or graphene oxide weaponized blood circuits in the human body in the case of these injections – and its data could theoretically control every aspect of human interaction.
A Spanish investigative team known as La Quinta Columna revealed on June 30 that graphene oxide was indeed the key ingredient in Pfizer’s “Covid-19 vaccine” serum.
Author’s View:
Should We Be Worried? I already made the self-deprecating admission that I’m not the smartest guy in the room, but I do have a nose for conspiracies. This one passes the smell test. It’s a legitimate concern, but there’s a caveat. Is Graphene Oxide as an ingredient in the vaccines part of the plan by the powers-that-be to commit some heinous crimes against the world? I’d say there’s a 95% chance that it is.
With that said, the caveat is that most of the theories surrounding it are lacking. There is speculation that they could be used to modify our DNA. Others say it’s a 5G play. Some are saying the magnetic nature of Graphene Oxide could be used as a “kill switch.” We have the standard mind-control theories that invariably pop up whenever a foreign agent is injected into our bodies.
That’s just the tip of the iceberg as far as Graphene Oxide theories. Which are true? Are there others? I’d love to hear from readers in the comments or through the contact form on this site, which goes directly to me. We need as much information as possible so we can sift through and find reality. Remember (tinfoil hat time), there are those in the “conspiracy theory” world who are actually working for the powers-that-be to cast misdirection into the conversations. The mystery is never about discovering the right answer. The mystery is in determining which seemingly right answer is real and which ones are planted to keep the truth hidden.
At this point, we’re still in rapid-information-gathering mode. Like I said, the smell test tells us there’s something here. Theories surrounding it range from crazy to crazier. We’re in a hurry to discover what is going on, but not in a rush to come to a false conclusion.
A cat lady AND a hippie.
Great.
Of the links I posted, these are peer reviewed studies.
**The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
**Attenuation of clinical and immunological outcomes during SARS-CoV-2 infection by ivermectin
EMBO Mol Med (2021)13:e14122https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202114122
**Elucidation of the inhibitory activity of ivermectin with host nuclear importin α and several SARS-CoV-2 targets
https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1911857
**Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
https://ivmmeta.com
This link has a database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 113 studies, 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups.
**The broad spectrum host-directed agent ivermectin as an antiviral for SARS-CoV-2 ?
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.042
I’m not sure you understand the term ‘materialistic’ in its proper sense.
But I’m going to sleep now, and you’re SOL.
Get help.
I know you’re living in fear, over your choice, but disparaging (and, lying about) Republicans, while applauding Dems, on a conservative forum, is not a “smart” way to lash out.
And, your cohorts would demand a link for that thrashing out post.
I don’t give a fig where you pulled that from.
Once, again....go away, gnat.
Every three minutes, a pretend conservative, defender of the state loses 188k brain cells just from thinking stupid thoughts. That number jumps by 19.74% if he types those stupid thoughts on the internet. If vaxxed, the loss is off the charts. Our flux capacitor could not handle the volume.
Science.
(and this has been peer reviewed)
Oh, I think I do, cat granny. Maybe you don't understand the term 'hippie'. Ever think of that?
Smarter than you, remember?
Don’t even bother giving that Dem cheerleader the time of day with your well researched sources. Again, it’s never enough.
Even after seeing thread after thread of proof, posted by MANY, here...it is still in (fear ?) denial
At least they admit they’re toeing the Democrat line.
See post 204.
I didn’t realize they’re asking political affiliation at hospitals and (of families) at funeral homes, now.
Wouldn’t surprise me, with these XiDen/BigPharma minions, though.
Have a good night.
Thanks - good night!
🧐
Knock it off.
Oh -- but she brags that she was in a gifted and talented class, which proves she knows everything.
This is her attitude in a nutshell:
Now do Semmelweis.
Here's my counterargument in 2 annotated pictures and one sentence and one question.
US deaths from COVID by age, 2020-2021.
The overall death rate is about 0.3% or so.
That long line at the top, with the most people?
That's age 85 and over.
Here's the death rates relying on jabs, versus using Ivermectin, in Africa, where medical care/life support sucks, so your treatment better be good. (Johns F'ing Hopkins, too.):
Here's the one sentence.
Ivermectin was awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine, and over 3 billion doses have been safely given to humans since its discovery in 1975.
Here's the question:
Tell me again why we need lockdowns and universal jabs including 12-year-olds, and why we need Emergency Use Authorizations for a novel technology that has never worked in humans, when there is NOT a crisis, and we have a cheap, safe, NOBEL PRIZE winning treatment instead?
BTTT!!!
well. i would think that not including all the ingredients of a so called “approved vaccine” would amount to fraud. wouldn’t it? and if so, you’ve perhaps found a window (according to the FDA indemnity clause code—full disclosure, not a lawyer) that i’ve been reading for suing big pharma directly, not just indirectly for vaccine injuries though gov’t/big pharma money pools.
I wanna see Sheldon Cooper start feeding you chocolates, Penny.
Already been done by Dr Robert Young. See the comments to the article for the link.
Credibility has no place in science.
Since you like to brag about your meagre intellect when discussing issues far beyond your capabilities, I present the counterargument from a scientist who
went to M.I.T.
got a PhD from M.I.T.
in a HARD STEM field
and FINISHED the PhD at age 21.
...who also got a Nobel Prize in Physics.
The data is what matters, not the "credibility".
Credibility gives us Ignatz Semmelweis, who was an earlier MD who pushed for cleanliness during surgery, who was literally driven out of the medical field and driven insane, dying broke.
Because "credibility".
Credibility gave us the editorial in The Lancet, 'dBOOOOOONKing' the lab-"theory" of the Chy-na virus origin, literally solicited and orchestrated, by a guy instrumental in FUNDING the Wuhan labs where the gain-of-function work was done.
In fact the study published that showed ivermectin in a favorable light was discredited and removed.
Peer review matters.
You're behind the times, Einstain.
You literally have no idea what the living HELL you're talking about.
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies Covid Analysis, Aug 26, 2021, Version 112 — updated Morgenstern (V1 Nov 26, 2020)
(See how it's been constantly updated? They removed the "deBOOOOOOONKers' favorite strawman study from the analysis over a month ago. Moron.)
Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 72% [55‑82%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.
•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 27 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.
Or, here's another source, which ought to make your lips quiver and your eyelids flutter at the mere mention of the name.
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY.
DIRECT COMPARISON OF DEATH RATES USING THE JABS VS. IVERMECTIN.
I'd say your credibility just took about a dozen torpedos beneath the waterline.
Want a chocolate? (Operant conditioning)
ScienceDirect.com
Robert Young is a con man, and a convicted criminal. All his “college degrees” are diploma-mill fakes.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/ph-miracle-author-robert-o-young-sentenced/19346/
And that’s what makes this whole vaccine issue so difficult. You’ve got con men on the pro-vaxx side (example: Dr. Fauci) and you’ve got con men on the anti-vaxx side (example: Robert Young).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.