Lead Stories is full of Democrats.
Is there somewhere posted the real numbers from Lindell or Powell?
If I understood it right, the True numbers reflected only the cyber corrections. Not included were “ghost” voters, the deceased voters, the fraudulent mail-in ballots, voters no longer living in the area, etc.
‘Lead Stories’ = CIA fake storefront
You love to post this contrary democRat shit every day don’t you troll.
Do explain. I thought he explained it quite well. One thing does not a cause-effect make, as he explained. His R factor was when the odds align to a > .9 factor - as he said they were .994 if I remember correctly.
go ahead, curious what you heard as ‘poor understanding that the PhD has of the basic principle of correlation and causation and R factor.
Mike specifically mentioned that the “Big Lie” figures were just based on the off-site manipulation of the vote totals from the packet logs. It did not include any manipulation programmed into the machines. The off-site manipulation was necessary because the Trump voters “broke” the algorithm built into the machines. That is why there had to be an injection of Biden votes after the counting pause.
Dr. Framk’s understanding of correlation is the same as any other statistician’s understanding: You run the correlation algorithm and see what you get.
Lead Stores, a Facebook fact-checker. I thought they were somehow connected to China or Russia
Lindell’s constant promotion that he had Data Packets that would prove
China hacked the election WAS the Big Lie.
Nobody has ever explained why five key swing states stopped counting at the same time. It had to be a conspiracy. It could not be a random event.
The Big Lie v The Truth
I thought those numbers reflected only those votes algorithmically flipped by machines, so both pairs for each State MUST NECESSARILY add up to the same figure.
Uh, yeah that was the point. The votes that were truly cast for Trump were subtracted and falsely assigned to Biden. Were these people asleep through the presentation or are they really this stupid?
$50 million spent on investigating the 2016 election Russia hoax, without a shred of proof.
Now 2020, in broad daylight, the coup plotters steal the election for all to see and yet not a single dime spent to investigate foreign interference. /spit.
I watched his presentation the other day, and although I’m not a mathematician, a couple of things struck me.
Primarily, the percentage of registered voters who apparently votes. We know that Americans are notoriously lazy about voting, and turnout hovers around 40%. With turnouts as high as 97%, I find that highly unlikely.
Second, while it’s not a huge surprise that several of his charts lined up closely, I didn’t think that it should have been THAT close, especially for ten-year-old data. Not only would one have to account for births and deaths, but people moving in and out of counties and states. I would think that all of those factors together would have thrown things off a bit.
Frank is a physicist, clownboy.
We take just a wee bit of mathematics in physics.
Your hatred of Trump dating back to 2016 has unhinged you publicly on Free Republic.
Well you certainly are NOT a math expert...
From an earlier thread:
“The formula for calculating correlation is: The correlation between ballots cast and registrations for all counties in Ohio is .9993109593 which is of course EXACTLY what one would expect. “ -rwc1
Me:
No - not ever in the real world with real independent data would one expect a correlation that high.
0.8 is really strong; 0.95 amazing; 0.999 fantasy-with real data even when there is a expected behavioral relationship. This is not testing a physical property, like sunrise to change in brightness. This is behavior.
The gaslighting classes gestapo - fact checkers
Figures that you would pimp a known left-wing hit-job website.
They don’t mention Dr. Franks poor understanding of the meaning of correlation.
***********
Having listened to that part of the symposium, what Dr. Franks was talking about was the 2018 election and how POTUS Trump still blew them out because they couldn’t pack the roster enough by using the old tried and true of reinserting removed voters to the rolls.
I’ll add... That did also occur in 2020 but so much more also occurred. They’d learned their lesson in 2018 and had the system set up to pump out whatever numbers they ended up needing.
Liddell specifically said they only used numbers from the PCAPs of the machines. They did not try to account for the other 3-4 ways the fraud was carried out.