Posted on 08/09/2021 10:49:53 AM PDT by Signalman
The inventor of the basic technology used to develop the COVID-19 vaccines is warning that the Biden administration's aggressive universal vaccination policy is "bad science" that may very well "cause more harm than good."
Robert Malone, an immunologist and epidemiologist who identifies himself as the inventor of "the core mRNA technology being used by Pfizer and Moderna to produce their vaccines," wrote in the Washington Times this week that the Biden administration's "strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot."
Malone, who coauthored the op-ed with former Trump Defense Production Act Policy Coordinator Peter Navarro, claimed that Biden's universal vaccination/herd immunity approach to ending the pandemic is "flawed," in part because "the virus is now so deeply embedded in the world population that, unlike polio and smallpox, eradication is unachievable."
Malone also argued that the vaccines, "while good at preventing severe disease and death ... only reduce, not eliminate, the risk of infection, replication, and transmission," and that they carry the risk of "by no means trivial" side effects, including "serious cardiac and thrombotic conditions, menstrual cycle disruptions, Bell's Palsy, Guillain Barre syndrome, and anaphylaxis."
Virologists, Malone claimed, also fear potential further side effects, including "existential reproductive risks," as well as "various forms of disease enhancement, i.e., the vaccines can make people more vulnerable to reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 or reactivation of latent viral infections and associated diseases such as shingles."
The vaccines also present the risk of an "arms race," warned Malone, arguing "the more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk."
"We are simply saying that just because you have a big vaccine hammer, it is not necessarily wise to use it for every nail," the authors write. "The American people deserve better than a universal vaccination strategy under the flag of bad science and enforced through authoritarian measures."
ADE - check it out. It’s becoming widespread.
That’s what the administration wants
But surely, this guy is a quack and a rabid anti vaxer.
This can not be, the feceral government under Dr Mengele Fauci says we have to get the vaccine. ALL the vaccines and get them NOW. In meantime, we are required under threat, to wear a face diaper.
bkmk
So on point, this is a great article and points to the need for an early treatment approach not a misguided “vaccine for all” approach as the ChiCom Virus is now thoroughly rooted across the globe.
Will other Rat Media follow this line of science? Probably not. They are solely focused on State power and trying to coerce everyone to help Big Pharma get more billions in profits.
That doesn’t resolve the issue of the virus, at all. In Israel, the Pfizer jab keeps waning and now they even have people being hospitalized who are on their 3rd round of a jab with a booster shot.
This of course is what we can expect to see here in the coming weeks and months too.
“In the 1980s, while a researcher at the Salk Institute, Malone conducted studies on messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, discovering that it was possible to transfer mRNA protected by a liposome into cultured cells to signal the information needed for the production of proteins.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Malone
“the more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get”
I don’t know of any basis or suggested reasoning for such a statement.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6KlxdwQxtdou/
Dr Dan Stock provides a 6 minute talk on masks, Covid, science and history. There are lot of good facts presented in this short presentation. Dr. Stock provides information in a very professional manor that the Jim Jones death cult does not want the American public to hear.
I can’t help but look back at the Hong Kong Flu in 68. It was horrible and killed about 1 million people but without vaccines and masks it had pretty much burned itself out by 69. Covid is reported to have killed 4 million people which makes you think this is so much worse than the Hong Kong Flu, but then you remember how over inflated that number is and have to wonder what would have happened if we had not had the disease fear mongers on us every waking minute.
Big Pharma is going to have to keep raising their earnings forecast they will be making so much money. Pfizer has posted record earnings and has issued guidance for another $10 billion on top of that for next quarter. Jabbed every 3 months for life! Or until the ‘side effects’ catch up to you.
Perhaps you could try doing a basic internet search to find out how vaccines can drive mutations.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510/
This Malone guy is stupid for the following reason - he says “the more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get”.
If there is no vaccine, there is no such thing as a “vaccine resistant mutation”. So his statement is like saying without cheese there is no Swiss cheese. Also, if there are fewer infections (obviously with a vaccinated population there are fewer infections) there are fewer copies of the virus replicating themselves inside infected people, so there is a reduced chance of mutations. Whether he was a great biologist I don’t know, but what he is saying now is nonsense.
And the same argument can be made about antibiotics. If there were no antibiotics, there would be no antibiotic-resistant bacteria. So should we get rid of antibiotics?
if there are fewer infections (obviously with a vaccinated population there are fewer infections) there are fewer copies of the virus replicating themselves inside infected people, so there is a reduced chance of mutations
That’s before a mutation occurs.
Geert vanden Bosche’s theory:
A response (that is beyond my meager knowledge of immunology):
https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/addressing-geert-vanden-bossches-claims
“Ending COVID-19 will require vaccination- this is not a matter of debate or discussion. Viruses evolve towards greater transmissibility, but they cannot evolve unless they have hosts. Fortunately, SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses are unique in that they have a proofreading RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that slows mutation rates by a factor of about 20, which means they are slower to mutate, but this is irrelevant if they can infect well over 20 times more people than other RNA viruses. Vaccines clearly reduce viral load, prevent severe disease, and disrupt transmission, and they can thankfully be readily modified to address problematic variants as is done every season for influenza with great effect. They are the way out until someone proposes something better.”
Winter is coming.
“the more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get”
I don’t know of any basis or suggested reasoning for such a statement.
—
You increase natural selection pressure, by attempting to eradicate a virus with an imperfect vaccine. The vaccine produces an imperfect immunizing response which kills *most* of the virus, but a few survive. The ones that survive, thru natural selection, are the more resistant to the vaccine induced immunity. They replicate and become more prevalent.
Consider for a full year, prior to the vaccines, the original strain was the strain that spread worldwide. No selection pressure. Eight to nine months after worldwide deployment of the vaccines we have the rise of numerous variants.
And the same argument can be made about antibiotics. If there were no antibiotics, there would be no antibiotic-resistant bacteria. So should we get rid of antibiotics?
—
What we don’t do with antibiotics is proscribe them wildly for everything. Because the more you use a given antibiotic, the more likely a spontaneous mutation of a given bacteria will evade it.
That’s why hospitals, which tend to use a lot of antibiotics, is where you go to find the “best” (worst) infectious bacteria.
It’s also why we need to keep coming up with new antibiotics as we’re in an “arms” race with the ever more deadly forms of bacteria.
“Perhaps you could try doing a basic internet search to find out how vaccines can drive mutations.”
Mother Nature has been on a two hundred-year losing streak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.