“And why SCARE is in brackets?”
________________________________________________________
“A long time ago, I looked up acronyms for SCARE, but didn’t find anything useful. The closest I came to an applicable meaning was the military and government term for Standard Collection Asset Request Format, also known as SCARF.
Square brackets have often been used by Q as a kill box (termination of job or death of the contents of the box). It doesn’t seem to fit very well here, but that’s been our interpretation in the past.”
_________________________________—
What about?
Side Channel Analysis for Reverse Engineering (SCARE) — An Improved Attack Against a Secret A3/A8 GSM Algorithm
_____________________________________________
That’s all I got.
Maybe someone here can translate this into terms those of us with small brains can comprehend.
Although I tend to think that what Q meant by putting “scare event necessary” with “scare” in brackets and bold is the literal meaning of the word.
I think it means some threat will seem real and scary because it is but that the threat will be neutralized, which is what the kill brackets mean.
There will be a period of time during which it won’t seem neutralized.
I am wondering if the mandate that the military be vaccinated is not the scare event and meant to scare those in the military. Well, both scare and P.O.
I have always considered Q’s [brackets] as indicating “controlled action”.
Boxed-in.
Known quantity.
Possibly known \beforehand\.
Under the authority of known actors; WH/BH.
YMMV
Side Channel Analysis for Reverse Engineering (SCARE) — An Improved Attack Against a Secret A3/A8 GSM Algorithm
___________________________________________________
That’s an interesting find. I’m sorry it took me awhile to respond to you. A3 and A8 GSM algorithms have to do with phone security. GSM is supposed to be the most secured cellular telecommunications system available today. A3 is the user authentication algorithm and A8 is the ciphering key generating algorithm. GSM maintains end-to-end security by retaining the confidentiality of calls and the anonymity of the GSM subscriber.
If the black hats were the subscribers and the white hats figured out how to attack the GSM algorithms, then the WH would have access to the identities of the phone users and their phone comms. Didn’t Q post photos lifted from their phones or am I conflating two events?
If this is accurate, then the [SCARE] event could be referring to the hacking of their phones. I haven’t noodled out why SCARE is in square brackets yet, except maybe to provide some deniability.