‘they’ admitted ‘what’?
and why do people keep posting the graphene oxide stuff that is now on it’s 4th itteration/insinuation?
as to ‘government servers’ is this 4chan talk? reddit?
because everything you’d ever want to know about GO is readily available, like for instance, here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/graphene-oxide
I use Graphene Oxide on Chicken before I BBQ it.
Delicious. Better than Pineapple on Pizza……..
They listen to Alex zjones and believe him
as to ‘government servers’ is this 4chan talk? reddit?
because everything you’d ever want to know about GO is readily available, like for instance, here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/graphene-oxide
*************************************************************************************************
No it is no 4chan or reddit.
I went to your link. It did not have any information about research for CV19 and GO effectiveness against the virus.
Very interesting information. Post some more info on GO we might as well become experts on it, since it could be in some of the future therapies.
They "admitted" that graphene oxide inhibits the Covid virus, which of course is a good thing. It also praises HCQ in the introductory portion of the paper for interfering with the virus.
I doubt that ransomnote has any idea of how to sift through this paper and is counting on everyone else being in that same boat. The game is to post some eye-glazing boilerplate, and then tell the reader what to think about it.
But there's a technique to reading papers like this. The vast majority of this paper is a description of the experiments involved and it's only of interest to their fellow researchers. Often there is a "Conclusion" where laymen can find out what the writer thinks of his study. In this case he tells you very briefly in the "Discussion" and "Introduction" sections.
You didn’t read the OP’s article, did you?