They "admitted" that graphene oxide inhibits the Covid virus, which of course is a good thing. It also praises HCQ in the introductory portion of the paper for interfering with the virus.
I doubt that ransomnote has any idea of how to sift through this paper and is counting on everyone else being in that same boat. The game is to post some eye-glazing boilerplate, and then tell the reader what to think about it.
But there's a technique to reading papers like this. The vast majority of this paper is a description of the experiments involved and it's only of interest to their fellow researchers. Often there is a "Conclusion" where laymen can find out what the writer thinks of his study. In this case he tells you very briefly in the "Discussion" and "Introduction" sections.
buried in “Discussion” : “no experimental work was offered to validate the computational observations”
in silico is not in vivo . So what’s the point? But someone is supposed to be keeping me from knowing that secret point?
copper can kill a whole lot of things including Sars, too, but real world application, not so great either. Great for roofs tho. The further arguement is made, well, GO will be matrixed; so was lead in paint. ;)
The pattern I see is, rumor that GO is in AstraZeneca. First a University lab, then some obscure lab finding. That gets shot down. In flames. Then comes, oh well here’s this research right here that said it ‘could’ be used in vaccines so it ‘must’ be in vaccines ‘they’ are just not telling you and this paper will disappear.
Seems to me there’s a whole lot of interest in keeping Americans and westerners in particular from trusting Trump’s vaccine - or any vaccine for that matter.
You see the irony, don't you? You're posting some eye-glazing drivel and telling readers what to think about it, and how to read.
“ I doubt that ransomnote has any idea of how to sift through this paper and is counting on everyone else being in that same boat. The game is to post some eye-glazing boilerplate, and then tell the reader what to think about it.”
———————————————————————————————
You hit the nail there.
It’s done time and time again.
Floods the Thread with charts and links and concludes what is sinister about it all.
In this case: “They Admitted It.”
At this point who is she trying to convince? People have pretty much decided what they want to do.
I think its emotionally driven.
The attention, the “Oh thank you, you’re so smart” Ego, Obsession, and feeling of righteousness.
Then certain of her regular defenders turn the conversation into amusement, their cure for boredom.
Hopefully by this time next year this Pandemic will be behind us and a New and Improved Conspiracy (more amusing one I hope) will spring up.