As for Karen Kingston not having worked for the company for 14 years is not relevant at all, nor is it relevant what drug she sold, but you know that you only provided part of what she did to paint her a certain way to support your narrative, much like the MSM does. It is nothing more than propaganda. Do you work for the MSM?
What is relevant is the research she has claimed to have done. While I would like to see a more detailed showing in the description were the exhibits she presented are posted along with the video. However, she is not the only source making claims that graphene oxide is an ingredient in the vaccines.
In April of 2021 Canada found graphene oxide in KN95 face masks:
Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide
The above link even gets into La Quinta Columna’s extensive research into graphene oxide as the potential vector for Covid-19 drug delivery. The link below goes into more detail:
Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines
Now I personally don't care if you believe or don't believe, but I see no reason for you to act like the social media companies that are working overtime to suppress the truth on numerous topics, when you have no clue if this is BS or the truth, yet you state that it is not the truth unequivocally. People have the right to know, regardless of what you think is the reality.
I certainly am not going to take your truly uninformed word on the subject, when there are many renowned doctors like Dr. Robert Malone who are raising deep concerns about these vaccines.
BRAVO!
WRONG! I did my own research, using web search engines, a skill you apparently think is beneath you. And I reported here what I'd found, and then at that point I knew I agreed with gas_dr and stated that.
"As for Karen Kingston not having worked for the company for 14 years..."
WRONG! I said *at least* 14 years, as soon as I'd found an article written in 2007 describing her as formerly working for Pfizer. Soon after I posted, someone else using a web search engine (you might want to try that sometime?) found an article that she had left Pfizer in 1998.
"... for 14 years is not relevant at all ..."
WRONG! It's entirely relevant to the accusation I was making (and still make) that this article was trashy clickbait designed to lure the tinfoil hats to click on it and make some bottom-feeder a ton in advert $$.
EXHIBIT A - THE CLAIM: The actual title of the clickbait article is: "DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'". The fact that Pfizer is universally known as a Covid Vaccine provider, plus the words "Former Pfizer Employee" are supposed to be taken together as "Aha! A Pfizer Whistleblower. An Insider. Must be someone who just quit or was fired, and is now spilling the beans. And obviously someone who knows what they're talking about ... a research scientist probably."
EXHIBIT B - THE REALITY: She was in sales until leaving Pfizer in 1998. She has as much credibility as a "Pfizer Whistleblower on the Covid Vaccine" as a janitor who retired in 1998 has.
These two taken together, are near 100% proof that this is trashy clickbait. If the headline had stated accurately: "A Woman Named Karen Claims Poison in Covid Vaccine," the clicks and therefore the ad revenue would be a small fraction of what they are. Yet she has as much relevance to insider knowledge of the latest Covid vaccine details as any random citizen.
That is *WHY* it is clickbait, because the wording is a lie-by-implication that's designed to give an aura of credibility and authority to the conspiracy-monger that they haven't earned. You really do *NOT* understand how clickbait is designed? You literally do *NOT* realize when you are being played? Good grief! People who sell Auto Warranty Extensions over the phone are searching for people like you. Try not to let them find you.
"... but you know that you only provided part of what she did..."
WRONG! I quoted or described absolutely NOTHING of what she said. I did nothing more than search out her actual credentials and prove that this was bottom-feeding/trolling clickbait. (And they obviously snagged you on their hook).
Wow! We're up to 4 falsehoods already in your post, and we've only gotten halfway through your SECOND SENTENCE. Sorry, but I'd be wasting my time to read any further. If you actually did say something of value in the rest of your post to me (that I will not now be reading), then that's a shame, but you brought it on yourself by front-loading your post with so many falsehoods so quickly and in so few words.
But in closing, I will quote the sub-headline to the clickbait headline: ".... Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient. ..."
If that sub-headline warning us of being *tracked* by the alleged poison still failed to clue you in that this was worthless clickbait, then I don't know what would.
But in your case, I am guessing that that line had the opposite effect on you, and drew you in even further.
Why don't you speculate for us as to how the tracking of us is to be done? I'd love to hear.
At least one thing I'm certain about is that my spiel above has actually made you believe more than ever in this crackpot conspiracy of being poisoned and tracked by graphene, because someone who sold Viagra for Pfizer up until 23 years ago says so, and with creds like hers, you can rest assured she is the Go-To authority on the latest Pfizer insider conspiracies.
Because all the most dedicated conspiracy theorists have this in common: The more foolish they make themselves look, the smarter they feel. The more holes poked in their tattered threadbare theories, the more certain they are of their rightness. The more Lies that are proved in their claims, the more confirmation that they are the ones who speak the Truth.
Because their same old worn-out mantra is trotted out again and again like a broken record, namely: "The flak is always heaviest over the target!" And it's corollary: "What reason could people have to get so frustrated with me and say I'm wrong? The only possible reason is that I am RIGHT, and they are pushing back on me only to try to squelch the truth! Yeah, that's the ticket! Their disproving the Conspiracy serves to prove it! Everyone who tell me I'm nuts is automatically known to be a member of the Conspiracy themselves!"
And thus it must be so obvious to you that I am part of THE EVIL CONSPIRACY! Else what reason could I possibly have to contradict you?
I betcha that's what you're thinking, eh? Admit it.