Posted on 06/04/2021 11:30:28 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine. In the shocking interview, the world’s leading virologist stated bluntly:
“There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have already been vaccinated. We must be prepared to cremate the bodies.”
The scientific genius backed up the claims of other eminent virologists after studying the ingredients of the vaccine.
“They will all die from antibody-dependent enhancement. That is all that can be said.” Video link here or below. 16.0k
I looked into this video first off to even see who he was…that test passed. He’s not really anyone special. Just discovered the human immunodeficiency virus also known as HIV.
Montagnier argued that the Coronavirus disease 2019 266 was man-made in a laboratory and that it might have been the result of an attempt to create a vaccine for HIV/AIDS 70. His allegation came after the United States had launched a probe into whether the virus came from a laboratory. According to Montagnier, the “presence of elements of HIV and germ of malaria in the genome of coronavirus is highly suspect and the characteristics of the virus could not have arisen naturally.”[45 801
I looked to see if he really said this…that test passed.
I then looked to see if it was just taken out of context…it wasn’t.
I thought I’d see the stupid things the so called “fact checkers” had to offer up. Here is their razor sharp insight.
(Excerpt) Read more at disclose.tv ...
Nobel Laureate doesn’t mean diddly squat. They gave Obama a Nobel just for being black.
Again.....this virologist has an excellent resumé and has done great things to warn of the potential harm and danger, of these shots.
But....as far as I can tell....he did NOT say this.
What other sources do you have that can back this (for now, FALSE) statement up...other than disclose.TV?
If he truly said this, then it should be easily found. I hate to see this man maligned, for something he (possibly) did not say.
TIA.
He actually never said anything about the vaccines.
It is a complete hoax!!!!
I know, sorry.
The point is there are people dying and having severe reactions to these vaccines.
The point is that Insurance companies are refusing to cover these things because it’s experimental.
The point is the real side effects if these vaccines have not been seen yet and we don’t know the outcome.
The point is you as a doctor don’t care.
He actually never said anything about the vaccines.
It is a complete hoax!!!!
Yes, he has said warning about these shots, but...AFAICT he did NOT say anything about this two year nonsense.
See my post #111 for the great work and things he HAS said/warned about.
This thread, imo, is doing a great disservice to this top virologist....who has decades of experience and vast knowledge.
dforest wrote: “Oh come on. what you posted is just pure bull shit and you know it. Only a dumb ass would believe it.”
There are multiple fact checkers that say the same thing. Only a dumb ass would believe this claim.
Don’t forget your towels, folks.
Tucker Carlson: How many Americans have died after taking COVID vaccines?
(Note: this is deaths not; doesn’t give totals for blood clots, dementia, paralysis, neurological issues, heart issues, spike protein issues in the next 2-5 years).
We checked today. Here’s the answer, which comes from the same set of government numbers that we just listed: Between late December of 2020, and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the COVID vaccines in the United States. Three thousand, three hundred and sixty-two — that’s an average of 30 people every day. So, what does that add up to? By the way, that reporting period ended on April 23. We don’t have numbers past that, we’re not quite up to date. But we can assume that another 360 people have died in the 12 days since. That is a total of 3,722 deaths. Almost four thousand people died after getting the COVID vaccines. The actual number is almost certainly much higher than that — perhaps vastly higher.
A report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 concluded that “fewer than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reported” by the VARES system. Fewer than one percent. So what is the real number of people who apparently have been killed or injured by the vaccine? Well, we don’t know that number. Nobody does, and we’re not going to speculate about it. But it’s clear that what is happening now, for whatever reason, is not even close to normal. It’s not even close to what we’ve seen in previous years with previous vaccines.
This sounds like it came right out of Mao's Little Red Book.
Hoax!!!!
Let’s post and comment about better things!!!!
In response to your vindication claims:
1. Not sure, but I will take your word for it.
2. Agree, and Fauci is an idiot of the first order who should be fired
3. Disagree, they were tested on a cell line from an abortion in the mid 1970’s but not developed using actual aborted fetus cells (I will concede they were tested on a cultured set of cells hundred of generations away from an aborted child). I agree this is a very grey area.
4. Very broad statement. The US government is falsifying how? We do know there were 500,000 excess deaths last year, it is hard to explain that except by pandemic. I am willing to listen to contrarian view
5. Disagree. I assume you are referring to Ivermectin and HCQ, these are NOT live saving drugs. While I think there is some limited utility, I think this is clearly not a conclusion borne by data. However, I will agree with you that they have done a piss poor job advocating the use of Monoclonal antibodies in early and moderate disease (Bamlanivimab and Regeneron). I think if we were serious, any CoVID dx with symptoms would receive one infusion of this just as PDJT did.
6. Disagree. The vaccines were properly vetted and tested in Three clinical phase trials. These vaccine platforms have been under testing since SARS (CoVi-1) but that was too aggressive ofd a disease and fell apart quickly. I understand some are uncomfortable with EUA and fast tracking, but to say they are not properly tested in my opinion is incorrect
7. Big Tech — I do not accept some of the premises in 1 - 6 so I cannot really comment on 7. However, I do think big tech is an enormous problem for conservative causes, and should be remedied
I appreciate your honest candid approach. I find that I dont disagree in entirety with you and you raise several valid points that must be considered in order to arrive at the truth.
Thank you for your candor. And not knowing you were a soldier as you stated in a previous post, thank you for your service.
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with this video and accompanying text. I don’t speak French, but I thought his words were worthy of critical analysis. It would be interesting to hear a French speaker translate.
I see you like to redefine the argument as you go along and I will call you out for the same.
1. Please quantify the number of DIRECT deaths DEMONSTRATING causation from the vaccine. You cannot. I even assumed your (overinflated) number was correct for the sake of argument.
2. You are incorrect, insurance companies are not paying for it because the government is currently making it free of charge. This is a gross over exaggeration of a policy.
3. The real side effects were studies in phase 1 - 3 trials. Of late there are isolated and rare reports of clotting (chance of clinical critical clot as in the case of cerebral venous thrombus is 1/1M), there are rare reports of nonspecific myocarditis in younger patients, none of which has been anything except self limited and did not result in death or permanent damage — and there are well documented other side effects including: muscle soreness, self limited fever, malaise, and other constitutional symptoms all of which are judged to be minor and of a brief period. This is no different than any other vaccination or therapeutic.
The point is as a doctor, I am versed in the risks, benefits, and objective side effects instead of the gross emotional debate surrounding fake news that your side seems to be gleeful to espouse even when disproven or wrong. This whole thread is entitled something THAT WAS NEVER SAID.
The fact that I can maintain a scientific and objective viewpoint seems to disturb you — and the point is you still will not answer a direct question based on the data. Even using your numbers, the risk of vaccine is 5x less than the risk you incur of getting in your car. Are you prepared to speak to this, or is your plan in perpetuity to try to not address this simple data driven point utilizing numbers that are grossly inflated.
You specifically said that this virologist has NOT talked about these ‘vaccines’.
I said, yes, he has....and, to look at post #111.
Did you do that?
I can’t find where he said what this headline says, and, I’ve posted just that.
I see you like to redefine the argument as you go along and I will call you out for the same.
1. Please quantify the number of DIRECT deaths DEMONSTRATING causation from the vaccine. You cannot. I even assumed your (overinflated) number was correct for the sake of argument.
2. You are incorrect, insurance companies are not paying for it because the government is currently making it free of charge. This is a gross over exaggeration of a policy.
3. The real side effects were studies in phase 1 - 3 trials. Of late there are isolated and rare reports of clotting (chance of clinical critical clot as in the case of cerebral venous thrombus is 1/1M), there are rare reports of nonspecific myocarditis in younger patients, none of which has been anything except self limited and did not result in death or permanent damage — and there are well documented other side effects including: muscle soreness, self limited fever, malaise, and other constitutional symptoms all of which are judged to be minor and of a brief period. This is no different than any other vaccination or therapeutic.
The point is as a doctor, I am versed in the risks, benefits, and objective side effects instead of the gross emotional debate surrounding fake news that your side seems to be gleeful to espouse even when disproven or wrong. This whole thread is entitled something THAT WAS NEVER SAID.
The fact that I can maintain a scientific and objective viewpoint seems to disturb you — and the point is you still will not answer a direct question based on the data. Even using your numbers, the risk of vaccine is 5x less than the risk you incur of getting in your car. Are you prepared to speak to this, or is your plan in perpetuity to try to not address this simple data driven point utilizing numbers that are grossly inflated.
I am a very awful person because when I heard it had gone H2H in China, I was cheering.
Finally! China is going down.
That only lasted until the morning I read about it hitting Italy.
“You know the antivaxxers are secretly hoping for this. Of course three months ago it was people would be dying on six months after infection. Now they are disappointed that it has not come true. So here they are saying two years. I read elsewhere some of our most vocal friends who are antivaxxers saying 10 years. I suppose keep moving the goalposts.
I am so sad that some on this forum are rooting for and hoping that many die so they might be able to say they were correct. I suppose Q really knows all.”
******************************************************
Yes and it’s interesting that the “Trust Sessions” crowd migrates here to wage jihad on the COVID-19 vaccines. I trust these clowns no more now than I did back then. Sadly, they’ve found some believers among the more gullible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.