IS COVID-19 A BIO-WEAPON?

The Highwire ^ | 5/15/2021 | Del Bigtree

[daydreamer]

Category News & Politics

Sensitivity Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uBEfAkPn7upc/
EVEN ATTACKS BY MEANS OF NEGATIVE REVIEWS CANNOT STOP THE TRUTH TO BE EXPOSED
* * *
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
IS COVID-19 A BIO-WEAPON? The origins of #Covid19 are becoming increasingly clear, and Dr. Richard Fleming, cardiologist and researcher walks Del through a shocking paper trail surrounding the SARS-CoV2 virus and its link to Tony Fauci and US funded gain-of-function research.
#FireFauci #GainOfFunction #GOF #FlemingProtocol #Covid19 #LabCreated #WuhanLab #CovidOrigins #TheHighwire #DelBigtree

Tägliche politische und Geoengineering-Nachrichten:
https://vk.com/chembuster
Meine Kanäle:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/chembuster/
https://vimeo.com/chembuster
My personal greetings from Germany go to all patriots in the world:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Eo3W38SBzzWn/

[JayAr36]

COVID is virus, the weapon is the super spreader called the media.

[grey_whiskers]

Yeah, you a such an absolute troll.
I re-read our latest correspondence.

You ignored essentially the same points before.

[absalom01]

You know, I was just minding my own business, and you pinged me. But at your suggestion, I did scan through some of your recent posts, and can see that this is just your M.O. You just repeat the same talking points and opinions, and if anyone disagrees with you, you immediately go for the ad-hominem. “troll” “branch covidians”, etc.

You seem uninterested in any actual discussion, just in throwing verbal brickbats, seemingly at random.

So, excuse me if I am unable to appreciate your brilliant insights and elegant expository prose. I’ll keep right on, and will make my best efforts to ignore your disruptive behavior in the future.

Have a great day.

[granite]

Indeed the "sweet spot" of the interesting times is coming to a close. I am glad I am old but agonize over the future of my grandchildren.

[grey_whiskers]

Nice cover.

But most people when they ask for why something is believeable, and are told that two Nobel prize winners in their fields endorse the idea, don't go on and pretend to have not heard, and repeat the same "fake-wide-eyed innocent" questioner persona on another thread.

They respond like "Gee, Two Nobel Prize winners? Got a link?" or at least make a courtesy reference the next time they're in a thread on the topic.

But TROLLS just repeat their original "oh I'm so new at these, I just have a *couple* of simple questions" (which reinforce the preferred narrative).

One of a number of techniques the BigPharma/DeepState pro-jab infiltrators have adopted.

[Peter ODonnell]

What our elites get out of this episode is a rationale for lockdowns, and the possibility of pointing to “climate improvement” as an excuse for longer-term restrictions on travel. This leads me to ponder whether or not the actual motive here is more complex, what China gained has been covered in this thread, but what our elites gained might be this ongoing downturn in air travel and a more confined population generally reduced in their mobility. Also some members of our elites just happened to be highly invested in the few companies that would profit from this event.

People tend to view this as a conspiracy theory, but I do have to ask this question — if powerful, well-connected people with success in business state in public their great concern about climate change and overpopulation (and meat eating and all the other details) then why do we routinely dismiss theories that they might be behind this episode? Are they not powerful enough? Are they not motivated enough? Why do we dismiss?

Because we don’t want to face the truth, that powerful people in our supposedly free society have taken it over and are using the government for their own purposes. This is essentially a revolution.

[Pelham]

Why haven’t you responded to the questions in absalom01’s post 28?

[absalom01]

I know I said I would ignore you, but it's a slow day.

Look, I am aware of the material that you reference, and have actually met David Baltimore a few times. He's a very smart guy, and his opinion is certainly worth adding to the pile of evidence.

But you simply have not made the case that you are advancing. And oddly, the opinion that I offered does not contradict your case in the least. So the energy you're putting in to this little flame war seems strange. And, at your request, as previously noted, I looked at your posting history. You are on a hair trigger to launch invective at long-time FReepers with long rambling rants that just never seem to get to the point.

And by the way, I didn't ask you for a link or any outside resources, and I don't have a preferred narrative. Never advanced one.

What I was trying to ask was how the opinion I posted, that this is a CCP bioweapon, in any way contradicts your opinion that it is a bioengineered bioweapon. The first statement can be validated simply by looking at the behavior of the CCP from November of 2019 on. The second is a valid line of inquiry that is not yet proved.

Why are you hyperventilating when there appears to be no actual point of disagreement?

[grey_whiskers]

...because if it *is* a bioweapon, allowing the final word to be "well, it was just a little lab oopsie, nothing to see here" is a monumentally low-percentage move: not for rhetoric, but for the long-term survival of the country.

(that is how I read your "...though that does not necessarily mean that it escaped from a lab, or even that it was “engineered” or the product of “gain of function” research." from this post.)

It's a fine line. Because people jump to two conclusions about the coof being a bioweapon.

1) The perfection argument -- this was also used to try to argue against it being engineered ("look! molecular modeling shows the spike protein isn't the tightest possible binding configuration to the human receptors! It *can't* have been manmande"). This argument goes, "If it were a bioweapon, it would have killed tens of millions in the US, or more. Since it didn't it must be natural!"

That's not necessarily true; people jump to that conclusion from watching too many James Bond movies. US policy has been for a long time, to consider that type of thing a "weapon of mass destruction" and to respond with nukes.

But a lower-level virus that just gums up our economy and makes politicians chase their tails -- and allows mail-in ballots and voter fraud -- that's not so clear-cut.

2) If it's a bioweapon, it must have been intended to be released in this form.

That doesn't necessarily follow. It might be the Chinese were still investigating, and the famous Chinese quality control happened, and a less-lethal, early version still being played with, got loose.

The reason it's so important to the survival of the country is this.

Our government, (remember the $1.5 billion deal with Hunter Biden before the election, solely because of "who he knew"?; remember DiFi's driver being a Chicom spy; remember Eric Shartswell on the House Intelligence Committee doing the BangBang with Fang Fang), and our Universities, and many businesses, are infested with Chicom spies.

China likely has visibility to US responses while we're still developing the response.

As far as my posting history, you pointedly didn't look for scientific links, even though that's what you originally said you wanted, and what I invited you to look for.

[grey_whiskers]

Why haven’t you responded to the questions in absalom01’s post 28?

I answered in post #34. Note that #34 is listed by the thread software as in response to post #28, too.

[grey_whiskers]

One other point, btw.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/exclusive-dr-anthony-fauci-funded-research-led-patents-chinese-military/

Yeah, I know, Gateway Pundit.
But they have links in the story, which give references to literature articles by people in China who are affiliated with the Chicom military.
Military (in a Communist country) is more than a make-work program for trannies to get their operations paid for, if you get my drift.
Worth considering.
Or looking up some of the papers to see how closely they are related to gain-of-function research in general, and at Wuhan in particular.

[Bill of Rights FIRST]

There is no “virus”. The “vaccine” is a bioweapon.

[Secret Agent Man]

Yes.

Next question.

[MinorityRepublican]

It might be. We don’t have the evidence yet. It appears to come from the lab in Wuhan. Was it an accident or on purpose? We don’t know.

[absalom01]

Thank you.

It appears to me that we have very small points of disagreement. For what it’s worth, my personal opinion is that this was most likely manipulated in a lab (and there is no such thing as purely civilian work in China), and escaped from a lab. I just don’t find the evidence in the public domain to date to be sufficient to convince a fair minded skeptic, but I can see that others may disagree.

I remain of the opinion that the CCP’s demonstrated strategy of containing the contagion internally, while doing everything in its power to see that it infected the rest of the word is a crime of historic proportion in and of itself. If the Democrat party (aided in part by the CCP) had not succeeded in stealing the election, I have no doubt that Trump would have addressed this aggression with some sort of national-security level response. Not necessarily military, but a strong response nonetheless.

[grey_whiskers]

Here, read it and weep.

Researchers at Wuhan isolated and sequenced a very fatal bat coronavirus (from a mine, miners dying in 2012, seqeuncing of virus in 2013) and ...hmmm, covered their tracks.

The researchers working on the virus told Scientific American in 2020, the miners died of a fungus.

Why not say the miners died of something with the same symptoms as the coof? That would've been a perfect "natural origin" cover story right there.

The article says:

"These examples of unpublished viruses may only be the tip of an iceberg. What they and the examples that preceded it highlight, however, is the importance of accessing the WIV’s virus databases that were taken offline at the outset of the pandemic. These are where unpublished viral sequences from the WIV and elsewhere were stored. The need to know which viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 were being studied by scientists in Wuhan in 2019 is urgent."

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3958177/posts

[Pelham]

Steven Hatfill is an American virologist who worked on bioweapons at USAMRIID Fort Detrick.

Hatfill addresses the likely origin of the Covid-19 virus starting around minute 22 of this video from March 2020:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePo0wdvafL4

[grey_whiskers]

He's lying.

The way he locks eyes with the camera right at the beginning, and saying "we've been waiting for this to happen since 2003"...nope.

Civet cats and bats together in a confined space...

Can someone drill down on the genetic sequence of the coof and see how closely it matches coronaviruses from civet cats? Does the coof infect both civet cats and bats? It sounds like the handwaving bullsh*t from Nature when the virus first broke out ("the binding to the human receptors isn't optimal, so it can't have been manmade"). Because part of Wade's article from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists / Wall Street, points out that the bats which were the original supposed resevoir were hundreds of miles away, and hibernating when it broke out; and that the current virus doesn't bind to bat cellular receptors all that well.

And IIRC, the "wet market theory" was rejected/disproved, so long ago, I can no longer remember what sunk it.

If its from the US government, it's lying.

[grey_whiskers]

March 2020. Way the HELL out of date.

[Pelham]

“March 2020. Way the HELL out of date.”

Out of date according to what? Your personal expertise in RNA virology and bioweapons?

Hatfill was a US Army bioweapons scientist. Feel free to provide your curriculum vitae so that we can judge your ability to discount what he says.

In the video he states that since the SARS outbreak of 2002 virologists have expected that another one of the 400 newly ID’d zoonotic coronaviruses would jump to infecting humans, and very likely due to the petri dish conditions found in China’s illegal wet markets.