Interesting info from Larry Hannigan.
One point of info:
Per CDC rules (and maybe other health agencies), anything under EUA cannot be mandatory.
So, given the warp-speed development and production of the shots, they could only have been given an EUA.
************************************************************************************
Yes, that’s been mentioned a number of times. We also had that point being made by David Horowitz and an excerpt and link was posted then too.
DJT executed a good counter move to keep the vaccine legally a choice — not a mandate — the reason that Derp Corporations are trying to do and end run around the constitution—easier than the Government trying to do it.
Here’s an unasked question: If there are “boosters” needed, will they too fall under the EUA or will those need a separate EUA?
The FDA is a bureaucratic department hired by the appointed HHS Secretary; no A&C.
Are we on the verge of continuous EUAs for the COOF?
At what point do the people raise their voice about UNELECTED pseudo-scientists making health decisions for them?
And an organization called ICAN has stepped up and is pushing back on the derp corporations.